(11-06-2016 09:00 AM)sfink16 Wrote:  It would've been an amazing prediction for me to make in my senior year since Temple was 5-5-1 that year but Tulsa was 3-8 that year.

Also no one would have known what an "AAC" was

(11-06-2016 09:43 AM)invisiblehand Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 09:00 AM)sfink16 Wrote:  It would've been an amazing prediction for me to make in my senior year since Temple was 5-5-1 that year but Tulsa was 3-8 that year.

Also no one would have known what an "AAC" was

True.

Yeah, next time you make a goofy photoshop like that, make sure you make it believable. Should have said ACC though people would be wondering how Tulsa got in the ACC.

(11-06-2016 11:49 AM)_C2_ Wrote:  Yeah, next time you make a goofy photoshop like that, make sure you make it believable. Should have said ACC though people would be wondering how Tulsa got in the ACC.

This one seemed to go over some people's heads. It was not not meant to be believable.

(11-06-2016 11:53 AM)Cecil_B_DeMoore Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 11:49 AM)_C2_ Wrote:  Yeah, next time you make a goofy photoshop like that, make sure you make it believable. Should have said ACC though people would be wondering how Tulsa got in the ACC.

This one seemed to go over some people's heads. It was not not meant to be believable.

Yeah. There's no way Temple would beat Tulsa. You're right.

(11-06-2016 12:25 PM)invisiblehand Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 11:53 AM)Cecil_B_DeMoore Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 11:49 AM)_C2_ Wrote:  Yeah, next time you make a goofy photoshop like that, make sure you make it believable. Should have said ACC though people would be wondering how Tulsa got in the ACC.

This one seemed to go over some people's heads. It was not not meant to be believable.

Yeah. There's no way Temple would beat Tulsa. You're right.

Yeah. Except for 35-24 during our only AAC meeting so far. You're right.

(11-06-2016 12:30 PM)TforTempleU Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 12:25 PM)invisiblehand Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 11:53 AM)Cecil_B_DeMoore Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 11:49 AM)_C2_ Wrote:  Yeah, next time you make a goofy photoshop like that, make sure you make it believable. Should have said ACC though people would be wondering how Tulsa got in the ACC.

This one seemed to go over some people's heads. It was not not meant to be believable.

Yeah. There's no way Temple would beat Tulsa. You're right.

Yeah. Except for 35-24 during our only AAC meeting so far. You're right.

Difference is, your defense isn't as good as last year's and ours is better. Also we have a run game that's at the top of the conference right now.

(11-06-2016 12:52 PM)invisiblehand Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 12:30 PM)TforTempleU Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 12:25 PM)invisiblehand Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 11:53 AM)Cecil_B_DeMoore Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 11:49 AM)_C2_ Wrote:  Yeah, next time you make a goofy photoshop like that, make sure you make it believable. Should have said ACC though people would be wondering how Tulsa got in the ACC.

This one seemed to go over some people's heads. It was not not meant to be believable.

Yeah. There's no way Temple would beat Tulsa. You're right.

Yeah. Except for 35-24 during our only AAC meeting so far. You're right.

Difference is, your defense isn't as good as last year's and ours is better. Also we have a run game that's at the top of the conference right now.

Dude we played you two years ago not last year

(11-06-2016 11:53 AM)Cecil_B_DeMoore Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 11:49 AM)_C2_ Wrote:  Yeah, next time you make a goofy photoshop like that, make sure you make it believable. Should have said ACC though people would be wondering how Tulsa got in the ACC.

This one seemed to go over some people's heads. It was not not meant to be believable.

No, I got it. I'm just saying you didn't cover all of your bases in giving any illusion that it was real. We all knew it was faked.

(11-06-2016 01:41 PM)_C2_ Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 11:53 AM)Cecil_B_DeMoore Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 11:49 AM)_C2_ Wrote:  Yeah, next time you make a goofy photoshop like that, make sure you make it believable. Should have said ACC though people would be wondering how Tulsa got in the ACC.

This one seemed to go over some people's heads. It was not not meant to be believable.

No, I got it. I'm just saying you didn't cover all of your bases in giving any illusion that it was real. We all knew it was faked.

I now see your name description. Well stated. Anyway, my point wasn't to fool anybody since I thought everybody was familair with the guy's yearbook prediction. I just was trying to get some back and forth between Temple and a team I hope they get a chance it play this season.

(11-06-2016 03:51 PM)Cecil_B_DeMoore Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 01:41 PM)_C2_ Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 11:53 AM)Cecil_B_DeMoore Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 11:49 AM)_C2_ Wrote:  Yeah, next time you make a goofy photoshop like that, make sure you make it believable. Should have said ACC though people would be wondering how Tulsa got in the ACC.

This one seemed to go over some people's heads. It was not not meant to be believable.

No, I got it. I'm just saying you didn't cover all of your bases in giving any illusion that it was real. We all knew it was faked.

I now see your name description. Well stated. Anyway, my point wasn't to fool anybody since I thought everybody was familair with the guy's yearbook prediction. I just was trying to get some back and forth between Temple and a team I hope they get a chance it play this season.

If that's the case I'll get things stirred up.

Our TU >Your TU. #trashtalk

(11-06-2016 04:16 PM)Hurricane Drummer Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 03:51 PM)Cecil_B_DeMoore Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 01:41 PM)_C2_ Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 11:53 AM)Cecil_B_DeMoore Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 11:49 AM)_C2_ Wrote:  Yeah, next time you make a goofy photoshop like that, make sure you make it believable. Should have said ACC though people would be wondering how Tulsa got in the ACC.

This one seemed to go over some people's heads. It was not not meant to be believable.

No, I got it. I'm just saying you didn't cover all of your bases in giving any illusion that it was real. We all knew it was faked.

I now see your name description. Well stated. Anyway, my point wasn't to fool anybody since I thought everybody was familair with the guy's yearbook prediction. I just was trying to get some back and forth between Temple and a team I hope they get a chance it play this season.

If that's the case I'll get things stirred up.

Our TU >Your TU. #trashtalk

You guys are phonies. Should be UT you're not a real TU.

You'd NEVER say that to TUL$A's face!

(11-06-2016 06:41 PM)RealTUTypical Wrote:  You'd NEVER say that to TUL$A's face!

Probably not. At 6'6" tall, I'd probably be talking over your head.

(11-06-2016 05:24 PM)TforTempleU Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 04:16 PM)Hurricane Drummer Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 03:51 PM)Cecil_B_DeMoore Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 01:41 PM)_C2_ Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 11:53 AM)Cecil_B_DeMoore Wrote:  This one seemed to go over some people's heads. It was not not meant to be believable.

No, I got it. I'm just saying you didn't cover all of your bases in giving any illusion that it was real. We all knew it was faked.

I now see your name description. Well stated. Anyway, my point wasn't to fool anybody since I thought everybody was familair with the guy's yearbook prediction. I just was trying to get some back and forth between Temple and a team I hope they get a chance it play this season.

If that's the case I'll get things stirred up.

Our TU >Your TU. #trashtalk

You guys are phonies. Should be UT you're not a real TU.

Let's start the movement! No more TU for University of Tulsa...UT from now on!

What do UT fans think of the game with Navy this weekend?

Teh rivalry...

Sent from my SM-G935V using CSNbbs mobile app