It should come as no surprise, but Hillary lied about the 17 intelligence agencies that said they believed Russia was behind the hacking of the Wikileaks documents.

What Clinton said was false and misleading. First of all, only two intelligence entities – the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) – have weighed in on this issue, not 17 intelligence agencies.


And what they said was ambiguous about Russian involvement. An unclassified October 7, 2016 joint DNI-DHS statement on this issue said the hacks
aying we think the hacks “are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts” is far short of saying we have evidence that Russia has been responsible for the hacks.

Maybe high-level officials would have authorized them if Russian hackers were responsible, but the DNI and DHS statement did NOT say there was evidence Russia was responsible.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/441...ked-russia

Lmao


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I won't believe this until I read it in the New York Times.

(10-22-2016 02:36 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  I won't believe this until I read it in the New York Times.

Or CNN


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Anyone with the ability to do these hacks has the ability to hide their tracks. And even leave a trail pointing to others. That's what makes johns posts so funny. No one has proven who's doing it and he keeps posting as though he believes "suspicion" is "known fact". And has the gall to accuse others of being un-intelligent for not taking guess's as fact along with him.

By the way, John McAfee says it's not the Russians. He believes Iran hacked the DNC, and North Korea hacked DYN. "If all evidence points to the Russians, then, with 100% certainty, it is not the Russians," said McAfee. He agrees with the dark web it's not the Russians.

http://www.csoonline.com/article/3133735...d-dyn.html

(10-22-2016 02:47 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Anyone with the ability to do these hacks has the ability to hide their tracks. And even leave a trail pointing to others. That's what makes johns posts so funny. No one has proven who's doing it and he keeps posting as though he believes "suspicion" is "known fact". And has the gall to accuse others of being un-intelligent for not taking guess's as fact along with him.

By the way, John McAfee says it's not the Russians. He believes Iran hacked the DNC, and North Korea hacked DYN. "If all evidence points to the Russians, then, with 100% certainty, it is not the Russians," said McAfee. He agrees with the dark web it's not the Russians.

http://www.csoonline.com/article/3133735...d-dyn.html

This explanation is the same reason why HRC can not say for certain that her private email server has not been hacked. It could've easily been and no trace was left behind.

Has anyone actually shown proof that a single email released was altered beforehand?

Has the evil b#tch ever told the truth on anything?

(10-22-2016 03:07 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  Has the evil b#tch ever told the truth on anyting?

She once admitted she thought she'd made an error about something but later discovered she was right to begin with.

(10-22-2016 02:41 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(10-22-2016 02:36 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  I won't believe this until I read it in the New York Times.

Or CNN


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

http://money.cnn.com/2014/11/07/technolo...nt-stolen/

Quote:If your Gmail account got hacked, blame your friends.
You are 36 times more likely to get scammed if your contacts' accounts have been hacked, according to a study released this week by Google (GOOG).

(10-22-2016 02:36 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  I won't believe this until I read it in the New York Times.

Same way zerO will find out about it...

(10-22-2016 02:21 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  It should come as no surprise, but Hillary lied about the 17 intelligence agencies that said they believed Russia was behind the hacking of the Wikileaks documents.

What Clinton said was false and misleading. First of all, only two intelligence entities – the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) – have weighed in on this issue, not 17 intelligence agencies.


And what they said was ambiguous about Russian involvement. An unclassified October 7, 2016 joint DNI-DHS statement on this issue said the hacks
aying we think the hacks “are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts” is far short of saying we have evidence that Russia has been responsible for the hacks.

Maybe high-level officials would have authorized them if Russian hackers were responsible, but the DNI and DHS statement did NOT say there was evidence Russia was responsible.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/441...ked-russia

She lies every time she opens her pie hole and the mental midgets take every word as gospel.

(10-22-2016 04:51 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(10-22-2016 02:21 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  It should come as no surprise, but Hillary lied about the 17 intelligence agencies that said they believed Russia was behind the hacking of the Wikileaks documents.

What Clinton said was false and misleading. First of all, only two intelligence entities – the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) – have weighed in on this issue, not 17 intelligence agencies.


And what they said was ambiguous about Russian involvement. An unclassified October 7, 2016 joint DNI-DHS statement on this issue said the hacks
aying we think the hacks “are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts” is far short of saying we have evidence that Russia has been responsible for the hacks.

Maybe high-level officials would have authorized them if Russian hackers were responsible, but the DNI and DHS statement did NOT say there was evidence Russia was responsible.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/441...ked-russia

She lies every time she opens her pie hole and the mental midgets take every word as gospel.

It's gotten so bad that I don't even listen to her in her videos. I know she's lying because she's not capable of ever being honest. It's a pity that there's so many gullible people. Trump is right, she is nasty.

(10-22-2016 02:41 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(10-22-2016 02:36 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  I won't believe this until I read it in the New York Times.

Or CNN

or from that show on the comedy channel. they're authoritative.

So Putin isn't that big of a threat?

(10-22-2016 02:36 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  I won't believe this until I read it in the New York Times.

That's not a big deal.

JohnnyZero is waiting to hear it from Chris Rock or Drew Carey since he gets his news from comedians.