Well deserved and I applaud the decision.


But.... What about Mardy Gilyard, Isaiah Pead or Tony Pike? Certainly those guys should have been added before now.

(10-20-2016 07:28 PM)CliftonAve Wrote:  Well deserved and I applaud the decision.


But.... What about Mardy Gilyard, Isaiah Pead or Tony Pike? Certainly those guys should have been added before now.

I can see gilyard and pead but no shaq or Tony.

Good player but ROH.
Was he named an AA?

What about Barwin?

I believe Shaq is the all time receptions leader in UC history. You ninnies.

(10-20-2016 08:47 PM)rtaylor Wrote:  I believe Shaq is the all time receptions leader in UC history. You ninnies.

How about BOTH Shaq AND Gilyard deserve recognition? Why does it need to be one or the other??

Gilyard was a serious Heisman candidate.

(10-22-2016 06:03 AM)BJUnklFkr Wrote:  

(10-20-2016 08:47 PM)rtaylor Wrote:  I believe Shaq is the all time receptions leader in UC history. You ninnies.

How about BOTH Shaq AND Gilyard deserve recognition? Why does it need to be one or the other??

Gilyard was a serious Heisman candidate.

This. Hell, not only does Mardy deserve to be in the ROH, there should be a statue of him near Nippert. Without Mardy, we do not go to the Orange and Sugar Bowls. Not only did he he do it at WR, but we have not had anything close to him returning punts and kicks since he left campus.

I love Shaq for his consistency and playing bigger than his size but Mardy was an absolute game changer with the ability to take it to the house on any play. Remember this play and how it changed the momentum in this game guys...

Loved mardy. He also did it at wvu a year earlier. With mardy returning we always started at least on the 35.

I was just pointing out the stat aspect of Shaq's inclusion. I do not know the criteria involved in selecting someone, but would think stats play a major role.

(10-22-2016 12:01 PM)rtaylor Wrote:  I was just pointing out the stat aspect of Shaq's inclusion. I do not know the criteria involved in selecting someone, but would think stats play a major role.

Mardy had the record before Shaq... Plus more yardage, moe TDs receiving and his contribution on special teams .

(10-22-2016 02:11 PM)CliftonAve Wrote:  

(10-22-2016 12:01 PM)rtaylor Wrote:  I was just pointing out the stat aspect of Shaq's inclusion. I do not know the criteria involved in selecting someone, but would think stats play a major role.

Mardy had the record before Shaq... Plus more yardage, moe TDs receiving and his contribution on special teams .

Then he should already be in. Did he graduate?

(10-22-2016 02:19 PM)rtaylor Wrote:  Then he should already be in. Did he graduate?

Good question. If he's not in, that might be the reason.

No offense to Shaquille but Mardy was a game changes a PTP'er. Remember the Pitt game!