What is this supposed to mean? You do realize there is no chance of a tourney ban or anything like that right? No LOIC, no charges against the school at all. The worst is long gone. Strange post.
Are you SURE? If so, good news!
Louisville scheduled to go in front of the infraction committee in the spring so no further punishments until then. If any further punishments are handed down they won't go into effect until the following season.
(10-20-2016 08:59 PM)Wolfman Wrote: Local news reporting that Pitino was charged with "failure to monitor."
Well sure they did. Why would your local news get into the nuts and bolts of this? They just painted with a broad brush what went on.
According to the NOA Pitino's "failure to monitor" McGee because they claim he didn't perform "spot checks". The NCAA did conclude that Pitino & Louisville has an atmosphere of compliance.
What is this supposed to mean? You do realize there is no chance of a tourney ban or anything like that right? No LOIC, no charges against the school at all. The worst is long gone. Strange post.
Are you SURE? If so, good news!
Louisville scheduled to go in front of the infraction committee in the spring so no further punishments until then. If any further punishments are handed down they won't go into effect until the following season.
The only way the banner is in jeopardy is if players that were on that team were ruled ineligible, which would have been in the NOA. No players were ruled ineligible. Worst case scenario is Pitino gets a suspension for 8-12 games next season.
What is this supposed to mean? You do realize there is no chance of a tourney ban or anything like that right? No LOIC, no charges against the school at all. The worst is long gone. Strange post.
Are you SURE? If so, good news!
Louisville scheduled to go in front of the infraction committee in the spring so no further punishments until then. If any further punishments are handed down they won't go into effect until the following season.
The only way the banner is in jeopardy is if players that were on that team were ruled ineligible, which would have been in the NOA. No players were ruled ineligible. Worst case scenario is Pitino gets a suspension for 8-12 games next season.
As we arguably had a Final Four caliber team last season, if they go game suspension, they should consider 4 games given up last year as time served and be done with it.
(10-20-2016 04:52 PM)uofl05 Wrote: What is this supposed to mean? You do realize there is no chance of a tourney ban or anything like that right? No LOIC, no charges against the school at all. The worst is long gone. Strange post.
Are you SURE? If so, good news!
Louisville scheduled to go in front of the infraction committee in the spring so no further punishments until then. If any further punishments are handed down they won't go into effect until the following season.
The only way the banner is in jeopardy is if players that were on that team were ruled ineligible, which would have been in the NOA. No players were ruled ineligible. Worst case scenario is Pitino gets a suspension for 8-12 games next season.
As we arguably had a Final Four caliber team last season, if they go game suspension, they should consider 4 games given up last year as time served and be done with it.
You can't do that. That'd be doubling up the sanction in one game ... the post season ban, AND suspended games for Pitino, at the same time.
And I think technically, the worse case scenario with the recent NCAA rule change on coach suspension is half a season. Not that I think that will be imposed, given that the NCAA has claimed in this very same report that U of L and it's program fostered a culture of compliance.
(10-20-2016 05:55 PM)Hokie Mark Wrote: Are you SURE? If so, good news!
Louisville scheduled to go in front of the infraction committee in the spring so no further punishments until then. If any further punishments are handed down they won't go into effect until the following season.
The only way the banner is in jeopardy is if players that were on that team were ruled ineligible, which would have been in the NOA. No players were ruled ineligible. Worst case scenario is Pitino gets a suspension for 8-12 games next season.
As we arguably had a Final Four caliber team last season, if they go game suspension, they should consider 4 games given up last year as time served and be done with it.
You can't do that. That'd be doubling up the sanction in one game ... the post season ban, AND suspended games for Pitino, at the same time.
And I think technically, the worse case scenario with the recent NCAA rule change on coach suspension is half a season. Not that I think that will be imposed, given that the NCAA has claimed in this very same report that U of L and it's program fostered a culture of compliance.
Rule changes didn't happen until 2012. Anything happening prior is under old rules. We paid our price. We should be able to have our record expunged if we meet certain criteria.
The failure to monitor is basically the Calipari rule. Holding a head coach responsible no matter whether they know or not because it is their program. This was such a crazy big horrible thing to happen they basically have to hit Pitino with it even though they said he did not know it was happening, it was so crazy he should have known something was up. He will fight it but likely they have to give him 9 games like Larry Brown and Jim Boehiem
(This post was last modified: 10-23-2016 06:43 PM by MHSCard.)
