I posted this little piece of truth in another thread.

Warning, this will trigger most liberals.

if
1. Texas is within 6 points and
2. hillary has 20 point plus advantages in NY and CA but
3. hillary is up less than 10 points nationally

then she has lost the election. for her to win the election, one of those things cant be true.

(10-14-2016 01:02 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  I posted this little piece of truth in another thread.

Warning, this will trigger most liberals.

if
1. Texas is within 6 points and
2. hillary has 20 point plus advantages in NY and CA but
3. hillary is up less than 10 points nationally

then she has lost the election. for her to win the election, one of those things cant be true.

it trigger libs because it's an asinine statement made by an idiotic poster only looking to troll and defies a basic understanding of polling.

So today we like polls or not? I am so confused. Some days we say polls are great and other days we say its not worth the paper to wipe your a$$.

(10-14-2016 01:12 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-14-2016 01:02 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  I posted this little piece of truth in another thread.

Warning, this will trigger most liberals.

if
1. Texas is within 6 points and
2. hillary has 20 point plus advantages in NY and CA but
3. hillary is up less than 10 points nationally

then she has lost the election. for her to win the election, one of those things cant be true.

it trigger libs

well, I warned you

Quote:because it's an asinine statement

since liberals believe the truth is asinine, that would be correct

Quote: made by an idiotic poster only looking to troll

in other words, someone who you have lost the argument to so yo uhave to resort to name calling

Quote:and defies a basic understanding of polling.

no. I understand mathematics. When you libturds manipulate data, and data and more data, what you fail to realize is that your manipulations dont add up to your other manipulations. You jack with a number in Texas. You jack with the national poll numbers. Then you tout 20+ point leads in NY and CA. And in the end, your manipulations mean there arent enough votes in the swing states for her to win. You see, you cant tout a huge advantage in 2 of the largest states, and only a small shortcoming in Texas, another large state, and reconcile to a sub-10 point lead nationally. There's not enough votes left unless she is losing badly in every other state.

no your argument is so stupid I'm debating wether or should even dignify it by breaking it down.

I'm not going to. you can live in your own little shell where such a erroneous statement is correct.

(10-14-2016 01:51 PM)john01992 Wrote:  no your argument is so stupid I'm debating wether or should even dignify it by breaking it down.

I'm not going to. you can live in your own little shell where such a erroneous statement is correct.

I dare you to try to make an intelligent retort. I double dare you. Do it!

(10-14-2016 01:54 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-14-2016 01:51 PM)john01992 Wrote:  no your argument is so stupid I'm debating wether or should even dignify it by breaking it down.

I'm not going to. you can live in your own little shell where such a erroneous statement is correct.

I dare you to try to make an intelligent retort. I double dare you. Do it!

liberals dont understand how math works... hence #commoncore.

(10-14-2016 01:56 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(10-14-2016 01:54 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-14-2016 01:51 PM)john01992 Wrote:  no your argument is so stupid I'm debating wether or should even dignify it by breaking it down.

I'm not going to. you can live in your own little shell where such a erroneous statement is correct.

I dare you to try to make an intelligent retort. I double dare you. Do it!

liberals dont understand how math works... hence #commoncore.

no you both clearly don't know anything about polling. like seriously. not even the basic understanding of how it works.

leave it to csnbbs where a couple of anonymous posters spend 1 min. looking at something, come to a conclusion that contradicts the consensus of an entire scientific field...and believe they are right.

the audacity one must have to take that approach

(10-14-2016 01:56 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(10-14-2016 01:54 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-14-2016 01:51 PM)john01992 Wrote:  no your argument is so stupid I'm debating wether or should even dignify it by breaking it down.

I'm not going to. you can live in your own little shell where such a erroneous statement is correct.

I dare you to try to make an intelligent retort. I double dare you. Do it!

liberals dont understand how math works... hence #commoncore.

oh shoot, I should have presented it as a commoncore question. ok, let me try it this way:

If Sherrif Arpaio prevents 20,000 illegal immigrants from voting, and Dick Cheney stole $500 from you while he worked at Haliburton, how severe will your butthurt be when Hillary ends up supporting TPP after Trump wins the election?

hell you guys don't even understand science at this point.

(10-14-2016 02:00 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-14-2016 01:56 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(10-14-2016 01:54 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-14-2016 01:51 PM)john01992 Wrote:  no your argument is so stupid I'm debating wether or should even dignify it by breaking it down.

I'm not going to. you can live in your own little shell where such a erroneous statement is correct.

I dare you to try to make an intelligent retort. I double dare you. Do it!

liberals dont understand how math works... hence #commoncore.

oh shoot, I should have presented it as a commoncore question. ok, let me try it this way:

If Sherrif Arpaio prevents 20,000 illegal immigrants from voting, and Dick Cheney stole $500 from you while he worked at Haliburton, how severe will your butthurt be when Hillary ends up supporting TPP after Trump wins the election?

hmmmm potato!

(10-14-2016 02:08 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(10-14-2016 02:00 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-14-2016 01:56 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(10-14-2016 01:54 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-14-2016 01:51 PM)john01992 Wrote:  no your argument is so stupid I'm debating wether or should even dignify it by breaking it down.

I'm not going to. you can live in your own little shell where such a erroneous statement is correct.

I dare you to try to make an intelligent retort. I double dare you. Do it!

liberals dont understand how math works... hence #commoncore.

oh shoot, I should have presented it as a commoncore question. ok, let me try it this way:

If Sherrif Arpaio prevents 20,000 illegal immigrants from voting, and Dick Cheney stole $500 from you while he worked at Haliburton, how severe will your butthurt be when Hillary ends up supporting TPP after Trump wins the election?

hmmmm potato!

I think you mean Potatoe.

(10-14-2016 03:11 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(10-14-2016 02:08 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(10-14-2016 02:00 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-14-2016 01:56 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(10-14-2016 01:54 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  I dare you to try to make an intelligent retort. I double dare you. Do it!

liberals dont understand how math works... hence #commoncore.

oh shoot, I should have presented it as a commoncore question. ok, let me try it this way:

If Sherrif Arpaio prevents 20,000 illegal immigrants from voting, and Dick Cheney stole $500 from you while he worked at Haliburton, how severe will your butthurt be when Hillary ends up supporting TPP after Trump wins the election?

hmmmm potato!

I think you mean Potatoe.

Potatoe/potato


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(10-14-2016 03:11 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(10-14-2016 02:08 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(10-14-2016 02:00 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-14-2016 01:56 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(10-14-2016 01:54 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  I dare you to try to make an intelligent retort. I double dare you. Do it!

liberals dont understand how math works... hence #commoncore.

oh shoot, I should have presented it as a commoncore question. ok, let me try it this way:

If Sherrif Arpaio prevents 20,000 illegal immigrants from voting, and Dick Cheney stole $500 from you while he worked at Haliburton, how severe will your butthurt be when Hillary ends up supporting TPP after Trump wins the election?

hmmmm potato!

I think you mean Potatoe.

I'll see your potato/e, and raise you this sh*t right here --- with none of her brilliant comments included.