(10-24-2016 12:46 AM)3rdgenerationtiger Wrote:  

(10-23-2016 11:30 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  

(10-23-2016 11:05 PM)macgar32 Wrote:  

(10-20-2016 06:26 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  I'm not the only one thinking we will play much slower (CBS Sports):

83. Memphis
Tubby Smith takes over here after being lured away from Lubbock, Texas, after Josh Pastner took the Georgia Tech gig. Memphis lost games it shouldn't have under Pastner. Memphis will win games it shouldn't under Smith. Dedric Lawson could become the best player in the American. The Tigers will also play much slower under Smith than Pastner.

https://twitter.com/MattNorlander/status...+293670913

You also said scoring 6 less points a game makes you less likely to win which is poppycock

I didn't say that. Obviously (even for you), if you score six less ppg and the opposition scores 5.9 or less ppg, then our chances of winning do go down. It's not rocket science for most.

That is EXACTLY what you said, and I quote from your own post which is #9 in this very thread.

And I quote:

Quote:Scoring 6 less points a game in and of itself gives you less chance of winning games.

You post so much negative crap you cannot even remember it all.

I anxiously await your post where you try to spin your way out of this one.

And don't forget to add your oh so familiar I hope I'm wrong disclaimer.

(In my 40 plus years in the business world, I've learned that a person who continually says, "I hope I'm wrong but..." really doesn't.)

There you go with those pesky facts. He says he doesn't need anyone's facts when he knows what the truth is.

(10-24-2016 08:24 PM)macgar32 Wrote:  

(10-24-2016 07:14 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  

(10-24-2016 06:25 PM)macgar32 Wrote:  

(10-24-2016 11:16 AM)Penny Lane Wrote:  

(10-24-2016 12:46 AM)3rdgenerationtiger Wrote:  That is EXACTLY what you said, and I quote from your own post which is #9 in this very thread.

And I quote:


You post so much negative crap you cannot even remember it all.

I anxiously await your post where you try to spin your way out of this one.

And don't forget to add your oh so familiar I hope I'm wrong disclaimer.

(In my 40 plus years in the business world, I've learned that a person who continually says, "I hope I'm wrong but..." really doesn't.)

Not going to respond to your petty word games. You can't read.

Scoring 6 less points a game in and of itself gives you less chance of winning games.

You are not very bright.

IQ test cage match? ACT/SAT scores? National Merit Scholarship Award winner? How old you were when you became a millionaire?

What do you want to use to see who is the brightest of the two of us?

Again proven by this post...

Yep

(10-24-2016 09:10 PM)Tiger87 Wrote:  

(10-24-2016 12:46 AM)3rdgenerationtiger Wrote:  

(10-23-2016 11:30 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  

(10-23-2016 11:05 PM)macgar32 Wrote:  

(10-20-2016 06:26 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  I'm not the only one thinking we will play much slower (CBS Sports):

83. Memphis
Tubby Smith takes over here after being lured away from Lubbock, Texas, after Josh Pastner took the Georgia Tech gig. Memphis lost games it shouldn't have under Pastner. Memphis will win games it shouldn't under Smith. Dedric Lawson could become the best player in the American. The Tigers will also play much slower under Smith than Pastner.

https://twitter.com/MattNorlander/status...+293670913

You also said scoring 6 less points a game makes you less likely to win which is poppycock

I didn't say that. Obviously (even for you), if you score six less ppg and the opposition scores 5.9 or less ppg, then our chances of winning do go down. It's not rocket science for most.

That is EXACTLY what you said, and I quote from your own post which is #9 in this very thread.

And I quote:

Quote:Scoring 6 less points a game in and of itself gives you less chance of winning games.

You post so much negative crap you cannot even remember it all.

I anxiously await your post where you try to spin your way out of this one.

And don't forget to add your oh so familiar I hope I'm wrong disclaimer.

(In my 40 plus years in the business world, I've learned that a person who continually says, "I hope I'm wrong but..." really doesn't.)

There you go with those pesky facts. He says he doesn't need anyone's facts when he knows what the truth is.

But he hopes he is wrong...

(10-24-2016 09:22 PM)3rdgenerationtiger Wrote:  

(10-24-2016 09:10 PM)Tiger87 Wrote:  

(10-24-2016 12:46 AM)3rdgenerationtiger Wrote:  

(10-23-2016 11:30 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  

(10-23-2016 11:05 PM)macgar32 Wrote:  You also said scoring 6 less points a game makes you less likely to win which is poppycock

I didn't say that. Obviously (even for you), if you score six less ppg and the opposition scores 5.9 or less ppg, then our chances of winning do go down. It's not rocket science for most.

That is EXACTLY what you said, and I quote from your own post which is #9 in this very thread.

And I quote:

Quote:Scoring 6 less points a game in and of itself gives you less chance of winning games.

You post so much negative crap you cannot even remember it all.

I anxiously await your post where you try to spin your way out of this one.

And don't forget to add your oh so familiar I hope I'm wrong disclaimer.

(In my 40 plus years in the business world, I've learned that a person who continually says, "I hope I'm wrong but..." really doesn't.)

There you go with those pesky facts. He says he doesn't need anyone's facts when he knows what the truth is.

But he hopes he is wrong...

But he didn't say that.....