If NIU had any semblance of a defense we might actually be able to win this.

21-17 WMU

I want WMU to win for the sake of the MAC... But getting them a loss would be good for UT. Then again... It would give CMU life again who plays us in 2 weeks. Hmm. I want more 30k crowds and a top 25 team I think. Final answer!

I want the MAC to do well in OOC but I will have no disappointment for the conference if we win. BGSU ruined our chances of going to a 2nd straight BCS game after we went 12-0 in the regular season. Besides, going undefeated is difficult so even if we lose WMU will probably end up losing to someone else down the road.

(10-08-2016 07:42 PM)epasnoopy Wrote:  I want the MAC to do well in OOC but I will have no disappointment for the conference if we win. BGSU ruined our chances of going to a 2nd straight BCS game after we went 12-0 in the regular season. Besides, going undefeated is difficult so even if we lose WMU will probably end up losing to someone else down the road.

Hopefully they keep that undefeated monkey on their back until us!

NIU had a good opportunity to take the lead but instead settle for a FG on the opening half possession.

21-20 WMU

Both teams trade FGs, now 24-23 WMU.

Why does our coaching staff insist on not having Lurry defend Davis?

Well that's the dagger.

38-23 WMU

What happened to that fellow they carted off? Hope he's okay.

(10-08-2016 09:09 PM)MacLord Wrote:  What happened to that fellow they carted off? Hope he's okay.

That was a tough hit. Helmet to helmet. But they did not put a collar on him or backboard.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(10-08-2016 08:28 PM)epasnoopy Wrote:  Why does our coaching staff insist on not having Lurry defend Davis?

Probably the same reason we settle for 3.5 ypc with Bouagnon instead of 8 or so ypc with Huff.

Quote:Why does our coaching staff insist on not having Lurry defend Davis?

Well, geez, what does Carey want -- an INT? I was glad Lurry didn't run off with any. It is odd your #1 DB wasn't on our #1 receiver.

(10-09-2016 10:49 AM)toddjnsn Wrote:  

Quote:Why does our coaching staff insist on not having Lurry defend Davis?

Well, geez, what does Carey want -- an INT? I was glad Lurry didn't run off with any. It is odd your #1 DB wasn't on our #1 receiver.

There are a lot of things we wonder about with Carey.

(10-09-2016 11:29 AM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(10-09-2016 10:49 AM)toddjnsn Wrote:  

Quote:Why does our coaching staff insist on not having Lurry defend Davis?

Well, geez, what does Carey want -- an INT? I was glad Lurry didn't run off with any. It is odd your #1 DB wasn't on our #1 receiver.

There are a lot of things we wonder about with Carey.

I wonder what he would look like at the local used car dealership instead of with the head set.