(10-08-2016 05:03 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(10-08-2016 04:58 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  HIS OWN DAUGHTER.

HIS O W N DAUGHTER................

Let them spin out of control Mach. They're too invested in the anti-Clinton machine to ever accept the fact that she's going to be the next President of the United States.

BTW, John McCain just pulled his support.

No one needs to be "invested in the anti-Clinton machine", whatever that is. One only need to have paid attention since she first reared her ugly, conniving, dishonest head in the early 1990's.

(10-08-2016 05:03 PM)Paul M Wrote:  He's made worse lewd comments about his daughter than that Mach. He's a scummy man. Most of us agree on that.

The choice is him or Hillary. As scummy as he is, Hillary is still worse and a criminal to boot.

He's a good man! A great man!

(10-08-2016 05:08 PM)Dasville Wrote:  

(10-08-2016 05:03 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(10-08-2016 04:58 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  HIS OWN DAUGHTER.

HIS O W N DAUGHTER................

Let them spin out of control Mach. They're too invested in the anti-Clinton machine to ever accept the fact that she's going to be the next President of the United States.

BTW, John McCain just pulled his support.

Colin Powell verified Bill is still "Boinking Bimbos" with Hillary's approval.

Source? Specifically, I'd like for your source to reference Powell's assertion that HRC approves and where he got that assertion from.

Apparently grabbing a woman in the ***** is sexual assault! True?

(10-08-2016 05:12 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  Apparently grabbing a woman in the ***** is sexual assault! True?

Rest assured that if you grab a woman in her TomFromLazybrook, you will most assuredly be charged with assult.

(10-08-2016 05:12 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  Apparently grabbing a woman in the ***** is sexual assault! True?

According to pajama boy? Grabbing a woman in the crotch, in reality, results a 95% chance of getting laid. Especially if you kiss her. That I can tell u.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

And Roger Ailes is advising the campaign. Does not get better than this.


Make America Great Again. Grab em right in the pu$$y

(10-08-2016 05:11 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(10-08-2016 05:08 PM)Dasville Wrote:  

(10-08-2016 05:03 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(10-08-2016 04:58 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  HIS OWN DAUGHTER.

HIS O W N DAUGHTER................

Let them spin out of control Mach. They're too invested in the anti-Clinton machine to ever accept the fact that she's going to be the next President of the United States.

BTW, John McCain just pulled his support.

Colin Powell verified Bill is still "Boinking Bimbos" with Hillary's approval.

Source? Specifically, I'd like for your source to reference Powell's assertion that HRC approves and where he got that assertion from.

Your probably right, she doesn't know anything going on. She can't approve if she doesn't know.

Here's the other thing that you guys don't get. He's saying he gets away with it because he's rich and powerful. Doesn't that bother you?

(10-08-2016 05:20 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Here's the other thing that you guys don't get. He's saying he gets away with it because he's rich and powerful. Doesn't that bother you?

LOL. Its okay because he did it doing everything the right wing hates. Hollywood stuff. Lawsuits. Elective use of bankruptcy provisions.....

But he thinks Obama is a "Kenyan Born Mooslim" and validates every privilege they think they should have in life, so they're good.

Remember to watch SNL or DVR it tonight.

(10-08-2016 05:20 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Here's the other thing that you guys don't get. He's saying he gets away with it because he's rich and powerful. Doesn't that bother you?

Again, I'd rather vote for a liberal donk dressed in R's clothing who has used his wealth and power to get away with bedding multiple women and is honest about it, than a liberal democrat who has used her (and hubby's) public positions to enrich herself and her family, and who has been extremely sloppy handling classified information and then lied about it.

Can't you grasp that?

(10-08-2016 05:20 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Here's the other thing that you guys don't get. He's saying he gets away with it because he's rich and powerful. Doesn't that bother you?

Pretty pathetic for the women, but we already knew they are gold diggers.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

(10-08-2016 05:20 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Here's the other thing that you guys don't get. He's saying he gets away with it because he's rich and powerful. Doesn't that bother you?

Does the rich and powerful getting away with things bother you?

(10-08-2016 05:20 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Here's the other thing that you guys don't get. He's saying he gets away with it because he's rich and powerful. Doesn't that bother you?

Hell, yes, it bothers me. He's a despicable human being. So's Hillary. And Trump can't be bad enough to make Hillary not be despicable.

(10-08-2016 05:20 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Here's the other thing that you guys don't get. He's saying he gets away with it because he's rich and powerful. Doesn't that bother you?

It's the truth. We want honest conversations about race and sexual assault? The truth sucks sometimes but you can either accept it and learn from it or complain about it with faux outrage. The system is rigged in favor of those with power and money. Who had a better chance to make substantial changes?

(10-08-2016 05:16 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(10-08-2016 05:12 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  Apparently grabbing a woman in the ***** is sexual assault! True?

According to pajama boy? Grabbing a woman in the crotch, in reality, results a 95% chance of getting laid. Especially if you kiss her. That I can tell u.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

That's what I thought and why I always carry a pack or 2 of Tic-Tacs.

(10-08-2016 05:16 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(10-08-2016 05:12 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  Apparently grabbing a woman in the ***** is sexual assault! True?

Rest assured that if you grab a woman in her TomFromLazybrook, you will most assuredly be charged with assult.

How do you know this? Do we have proof? I feel like if I have enough money then it won't matter.

(10-08-2016 05:20 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Here's the other thing that you guys don't get. He's saying he gets away with it because he's rich and powerful. Doesn't that bother you?

Duh. That's why you want to be rich.

(10-08-2016 05:29 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(10-08-2016 05:16 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(10-08-2016 05:12 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  Apparently grabbing a woman in the ***** is sexual assault! True?

Rest assured that if you grab a woman in her TomFromLazybrook, you will most assuredly be charged with assult.

How do you know this? Do we have proof? I feel like if I have enough money then it won't matter.

Let's have a real conservation about sexual assault

If Justin beiber inappropriately grabbed one of the female members of his audience without her consent what do you think the reaction would be for 9 out of 10 women there that he did it to?

(10-08-2016 09:10 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(10-08-2016 08:37 AM)miko33 Wrote:  

(10-08-2016 08:18 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(10-08-2016 07:28 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Stop just stop. This is not normal conversation.

Ever worked on a construction project?

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

You guys are missing the point. It's one thing if Trump was caught saying typical construction project - or any manufacturing plant for that matter - talk about women. It's completely different if the guy is talking about everything he can get away with because he's so famous (powerful). I have yet to hear any "mill talk" among the guys bragging about how they have the fame and power to take any woman they want, and that their grabbing of a woman would make that woman automatically submit to his sexual advances. If your typical guy on the shop floor of a steel mill, aluminum smelter, auto plant, etc would grab a woman by the crotch and say something like "you know you want it, I'm going to take you" then he'd be brought up on sexual harassment charges and probably prosecuted for assault.

I know shop floor talk quite well, and it's not typically like how Trump did it. That's the bait and switch here. Most of you are getting bogged down in the sexual talk itself. That happens all the time - no denying that. But the talk about what he could do to a woman if he wanted to because of his power - that's a completely different issue. That's the outrage, and many of you are blind to it.

I can feel the aura of estrogen eminating fron this post. Grow some ballz.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

LOL! You're dense.