Ah, thanks for the explanation on Pickens with regards to promoting SMU.
I have a "for fun only" question to pose you all. It requires you accept the terms of the hypothetical as is. Questioning the terms isn't the point. Like I said, just "for fun".
- assume B12 has to expand and by two
- Houston is in, plus one more
- the second has to be either: SMU or Rice
Who do you pick and why????
Already have schools in both Dallas and Houston. Although you could try to claim that Ft Worth/TCU is far enough away from Dallas/SMU to "not count", while Rice and Houston are right next to each other.
Both schools are filthy rich. However, I also have this thought -- which could be absolutely wrong -- that SMU's alumni wealth comes from being wealthy businessmen and law professionals, while Rice's alumni wealth comes from technology/science (ie nerds). And nerds care far less about donating to athletics. Like I said, could be wrong.
Finally, if there is any school in the south that I think could one day be poised for a Stanford style step change in football success, I think it could be Rice. They have the stadium in place. Have just invested somewhat in facilities. Big market. And are filthy rich .... if they wanted to spend it on hiring a big time coach.