georgia_tech_swagger
Res publica non dominetur
Posts: 51,456
Joined: Feb 2002
Reputation: 2027
I Root For: GT, USCU, FU, WYO
Location: Upstate, SC
|
Michael Cannon: ObamaCare premiums at least 20.4% higher than gov't claimed
http://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelcanno...4d837840c7
Quote:For example, taxpayers finance a large portion of Exchange-plan premiums through the ACA’s “reinsurance” program. The reinsurance program taxes almost all health plans, including most employer-sponsored plans, and uses the revenue to subsidize Exchange plans. The reinsurance program shifts a large part of the premiums for ObamaCare plans to people in non-ObamaCare plans. A study by the Mercatus Center found that in 2014, “net reinsurance payments paid by government to insurers selling individual market QHPs totaled about 20.4% of gross premiums.” That means that in 2014, the actual cost of Exchange plans—the full premium—was at least 20.4 percent higher than the stated premium. If net reinsurance payments to Exchange plans in 2016 are just 8 percent of gross premiums, the authors of the Urban study would have to adjust Exchange plan premiums upward not by 24 percent, but by 34 percent (1.24 * 1.08 ≈ 1.34). Applying just this one hidden part of Exchange premiums to the Urban Institute’s results shrinks the Exchange plan’s supposed nationwide premium advantage from 10 percent to 3 percent. But wait, there’s more.
Exchange-participating carriers have suffered losses, even after accounting for net reinsurance subsidies. So the full premium for Exchange coverage is higher still–and the insurers are paying part of it. In 2014, carriers suffered unreimbursed losses of $2.5 billion. We don’t have data yet, but the government has indicated carriers again suffered large unreimbursed losses in 2015. The Mercatus Center’s Brian Blase, a former congressional oversight investigator, estimates that even after accounting for net reinsurance subsidies, Exchange plans lost an average $1,000 per enrollee in 2015. If losses are similar in 2016, then the average Exchange-plan premium would actually be 13 percent higher than the average employer-plan premium. In Alaska, the average Exchange-plan premium would be 93 percent higher. These figures are totally speculative, I admit. The only thing they have going for them is that they are more accurate than the Urban Institute’s.
...
That lack of transparency has allowed supporters to claim the ACA is providing coverage to millions who are so sick that insurance companies previously wouldn’t cover them, while simultaneously claiming Exchange coverage is no more expensive than individual-market coverage prior to the ACA or than employer-sponsored coverage. When we incorporate the full premium for Exchange plans, the smoke clears and we see Exchange coverage is indeed more expensive than employer-sponsored coverage. There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch.
If you think this is fun, just imagine the shell games we could play with a public option.
|
|
09-25-2016 11:55 PM |
|
Pyrizzo
Eyes in the Sky
Posts: 3,642
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 235
I Root For: nothing
Location:
|
RE: Michael Cannon: ObamaCare premiums at least 20.4% higher than gov't claimed
Most of the lefty Obamacare watercarriers have been MIA for a while now. They won't eat that crow GTS.
|
|
09-26-2016 05:06 PM |
|
rath v2.0
Wartime Consigliere
Posts: 51,394
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 2175
I Root For: Civil Disobedience
Location: Tip Of The Mitt
|
RE: Michael Cannon: ObamaCare premiums at least 20.4% higher than gov't claimed
I'm surprise it's not higher. People I know in the system are having it broken off in them.
|
|
09-26-2016 05:30 PM |
|