(08-30-2016 07:00 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(08-30-2016 02:47 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(08-30-2016 02:21 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(08-30-2016 01:38 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  This obsession with Benghazi is so fascinating to me. The fact that more time and money has been spent on investigating it (correct me if that is wrong...) vs. 9/11 is even more bizarre.

Yeah, there wasn't exactly a cover-up of 9/11. Investigation was rather short and to the point.

Really? Why then have we not seen the video surveillance videos from the businesses in the area that apparently caught footage of the plane that hit the Pentagon?

Did you really just go full retard with this post?

Are you really surprised by his answer?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(08-30-2016 01:38 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  This obsession with Benghazi is so fascinating to me. The fact that more time and money has been spent on investigating it (correct me if that is wrong...) vs. 9/11 is even more bizarre.

Just think how fascinating it is to those family members whom lost Heroes that day ! We won't forget those brave souls and the ones that tried to save them.

Yeah, there wasn't exactly a cover-up of 9/11. Investigation was rather short and to the point.

Really? Why then have we not seen the video surveillance videos from the businesses in the area that apparently caught footage of the plane that hit the Pentagon?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conspiracy Theory 101: Obama did it to make Bush look bad so he could get elected president and have Hillary as His Legacy. "Oh the Humanity" Now We Know !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(08-30-2016 01:38 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  This obsession with Benghazi is so fascinating to me. The fact that more time and money has been spent on investigating it (correct me if that is wrong...) vs. 9/11 is even more bizarre.

Well there have only been 7 US ambassadors killed in the line of duty in our history. The last previous one was 1988 in a plane crash. The last one murdered was 1979 in Afghanistan. So its a pretty unique event and one we should work to prevent. Hillary doesn't really care.

(08-30-2016 02:41 PM)MonarchManiac Wrote:  

(08-30-2016 02:23 PM)green Wrote:  

http://time.com/4472874/hillary-clinton-...-benghazi/

30 "non-work" emails HRod tried to permanently delete via BleachBit were actually about the Benghazi terror attack.
-- @kerpen

again I ask ...
why isn't this prima facie obstruction of justice ...

HAUL IT 4 LESS

This right here. I don't understand how it is defensible at this point. She willingly tried to erase government property. I don't agree at all with the whole "intent" argument, but if we are going to have that as the basis for liability, then here is your "intent".

Lets hear the spin? Anyone care to TRY to defend this?

Back on topic. Why were these actions by HRC okay? How does this not reach the level of criminality? Can anyone defend these actions?

(08-31-2016 09:29 AM)MonarchManiac Wrote:  

(08-30-2016 02:41 PM)MonarchManiac Wrote:  

(08-30-2016 02:23 PM)green Wrote:  

http://time.com/4472874/hillary-clinton-...-benghazi/

30 "non-work" emails HRod tried to permanently delete via BleachBit were actually about the Benghazi terror attack.
-- @kerpen

again I ask ...
why isn't this prima facie obstruction of justice ...

HAUL IT 4 LESS

This right here. I don't understand how it is defensible at this point. She willingly tried to erase government property. I don't agree at all with the whole "intent" argument, but if we are going to have that as the basis for liability, then here is your "intent".

Lets hear the spin? Anyone care to TRY to defend this?

Back on topic. Why were these actions by HRC okay? How does this not reach the level of criminality? Can anyone defend these actions?

Not using common sense or logic.

(08-31-2016 09:31 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(08-31-2016 09:29 AM)MonarchManiac Wrote:  

(08-30-2016 02:41 PM)MonarchManiac Wrote:  

(08-30-2016 02:23 PM)green Wrote:  

http://time.com/4472874/hillary-clinton-...-benghazi/

30 "non-work" emails HRod tried to permanently delete via BleachBit were actually about the Benghazi terror attack.
-- @kerpen

again I ask ...
why isn't this prima facie obstruction of justice ...

HAUL IT 4 LESS

This right here. I don't understand how it is defensible at this point. She willingly tried to erase government property. I don't agree at all with the whole "intent" argument, but if we are going to have that as the basis for liability, then here is your "intent".

Lets hear the spin? Anyone care to TRY to defend this?

Back on topic. Why were these actions by HRC okay? How does this not reach the level of criminality? Can anyone defend these actions?

Not using common sense or logic.

Sounds Good !.............. Fingers crossed, hope they buy it

(08-31-2016 08:32 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(08-30-2016 01:38 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  This obsession with Benghazi is so fascinating to me. The fact that more time and money has been spent on investigating it (correct me if that is wrong...) vs. 9/11 is even more bizarre.

Well there have only been 7 US ambassadors killed in the line of duty in our history. The last previous one was 1988 in a plane crash. The last one murdered was 1979 in Afghanistan. So its a pretty unique event and one we should work to prevent. Hillary doesn't really care.

I'm sure she cares plenty. It's been a headache for months now.

(08-31-2016 11:07 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(08-31-2016 08:32 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(08-30-2016 01:38 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  This obsession with Benghazi is so fascinating to me. The fact that more time and money has been spent on investigating it (correct me if that is wrong...) vs. 9/11 is even more bizarre.

Well there have only been 7 US ambassadors killed in the line of duty in our history. The last previous one was 1988 in a plane crash. The last one murdered was 1979 in Afghanistan. So its a pretty unique event and one we should work to prevent. Hillary doesn't really care.

I'm sure she cares plenty. It's been a headache for months now.

Exactly. It's a political headache for her, that's it. If she cared for the actual people backup would have bent sent, etc.

(08-30-2016 03:21 PM)VA49er Wrote:  Hillary is untouchable and her supporters would not care if she finally told the truth anyway.

The truth about what? What exactly do you think she is lying about?

(08-31-2016 12:14 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(08-30-2016 03:21 PM)VA49er Wrote:  Hillary is untouchable and her supporters would not care if she finally told the truth anyway.

The truth about what? What exactly do you think she is lying about?