(08-26-2016 11:05 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 10:53 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 10:33 AM)ODU BLUE Wrote:  I didn't like this guy at first, but I have come to realize that he represents the only real investigative journalism jeft. The mainstream media has been hijacked by those in power. He's a throwback to when real journalist reported on our government. They dug deep for the American people and kept their sources confidential.

He only investigates the USA. That's it. He's not a real journalist.

Isn't that a big enough target to occupy his full attention?

Not if he doesn't want to be biased. And lets not pretend that WL releases everything. They filter it.

And its done not to expose the USA's faults, but to harm the USA. A secret cable from a political attache in Venezuela telling the US Dept of State about their thoughts on a particular candidate that might win office should remain private. All countries need to have an idea about the people they might need to deal with.

WL isn't trying to increase transparency. They're trying to harm the USA. They don't support freedom...but want to harm the USA.

That's all they are. Full stop.

(08-26-2016 10:53 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 10:33 AM)ODU BLUE Wrote:  I didn't like this guy at first, but I have come to realize that he represents the only real investigative journalism jeft. The mainstream media has been hijacked by those in power. He's a throwback to when real journalist reported on our government. They dug deep for the American people and kept their sources confidential.

He only investigates the USA. That's it.

Oh goody, more lies from Tom. Liberals lie.

https://wikileaks.org/+-International-Politics-+.html
https://wikileaks.org/+-Corporations-+.html

(08-26-2016 09:14 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 08:49 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  I prefer "Patriotic American" as the descriptor of those not buying into Assaunge/Putin's attempts to influence the US Presidential election for their own ends.

Just more proof that you dont understand the word patriotism.

A patriot would be concerned about ABC/NBC/CBS/CNN efforts to influence the US presidential election for their own ends and ignoring the massive corruption and repeated failures and lies of Hillary Clinton.

(08-26-2016 10:09 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  LOL. New Russian link to DJT. http://www.joemygod.com/2016/08/26/new-y...ump-tower/

What's LOL is that you post that.

(08-26-2016 09:17 AM)green Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 08:49 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  I prefer "Patriotic American" as the descriptor of those not buying into Assaunge/Putin's attempts to influence the US Presidential election for their own ends.

how do you sleep ...

The answer to your question lies within

(08-26-2016 11:05 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:03 AM)solohawks Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 10:53 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 10:33 AM)ODU BLUE Wrote:  I didn't like this guy at first, but I have come to realize that he represents the only real investigative journalism jeft. The mainstream media has been hijacked by those in power. He's a throwback to when real journalist reported on our government. They dug deep for the American people and kept their sources confidential.

He only investigates the USA. That's it. He's not a real journalist.

Well when you are the world's only superpower you are going to get extra scrutiny?

As an American citizen I applaud all efforts to clean up our act and weed out any corruption we can.

it's pathetic that the cons defend this.

I can't think of a more blatant example of #teamovercountry

I suggest you read Tom's and your posts. They're pretty easy to find.

(08-26-2016 11:17 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 09:14 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 08:49 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  I prefer "Patriotic American" as the descriptor of those not buying into Assaunge/Putin's attempts to influence the US Presidential election for their own ends.

Just more proof that you dont understand the word patriotism.

A patriot would be concerned about ABC/NBC/CBS/CNN efforts to influence the US presidential election for their own ends and ignoring the massive corruption and repeated failures and lies of Hillary Clinton.

Just wondering why Fox/FoxNews is also not on this list. You do not think they are biased towards the TGOP?
Hint they are.. and they shape views for the TGOP. FoxNews is MSM no matter how much they try to deny it.

(08-26-2016 11:08 AM)solohawks Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:05 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:03 AM)solohawks Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 10:53 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 10:33 AM)ODU BLUE Wrote:  I didn't like this guy at first, but I have come to realize that he represents the only real investigative journalism jeft. The mainstream media has been hijacked by those in power. He's a throwback to when real journalist reported on our government. They dug deep for the American people and kept their sources confidential.

He only investigates the USA. That's it. He's not a real journalist.

Well when you are the world's only superpower you are going to get extra scrutiny?

As an American citizen I applaud all efforts to clean up our act and weed out any corruption we can.

it's pathetic that the cons defend this.

I can't think of a more blatant example of #teamovercountry

saying the US government should be less corrupt is team over country? I dont care who is in office I am against corruption.

if it comes from a source that is blatantly trying to alter the outcome of an election, is only targeting one side, and doing so with the help of enemies of the USA then no...it can't be defended.

it's one thing for the NYT to do this and to do it in the right way. it's a whole different ballgame when these guys are doing it with ulterior motives.

you are propping up someone who has threatened to release blueprints for nuclear weapons in order to bring world leaders to his knees and has repeatedly put govt assets in real danger. it's astounding that the cons defend him.

#teamovercountry

(08-26-2016 11:20 AM)Greenroom Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:17 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 09:14 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 08:49 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  I prefer "Patriotic American" as the descriptor of those not buying into Assaunge/Putin's attempts to influence the US Presidential election for their own ends.

Just more proof that you dont understand the word patriotism.

A patriot would be concerned about ABC/NBC/CBS/CNN efforts to influence the US presidential election for their own ends and ignoring the massive corruption and repeated failures and lies of Hillary Clinton.

Just wondering why Fox/FoxNews is also not on this list. You do not think they are biased towards the TGOP?
Hint they are.. and they shape views for the TGOP. FoxNews is MSM no matter how much they try to deny it.

They are. And while their motto is "Fair and Balanced," they don't try to hide what they are. They actually do have some occasional balance. Also, they really aren't a GOP organization. They represent the conservative wing of the GOP and are very critical of the party at times, in contrast to the other media groups who avoid saying anything negative about Democrats and who pretend to be objective. Fox was more critical of Christie and Jeb than the DNC spin media groups were, although that was on talk shows, not during alleged news reporting.

(08-26-2016 11:21 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:08 AM)solohawks Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:05 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:03 AM)solohawks Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 10:53 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  He only investigates the USA. That's it. He's not a real journalist.

Well when you are the world's only superpower you are going to get extra scrutiny?

As an American citizen I applaud all efforts to clean up our act and weed out any corruption we can.

it's pathetic that the cons defend this.

I can't think of a more blatant example of #teamovercountry

saying the US government should be less corrupt is team over country? I dont care who is in office I am against corruption.

if it comes from a source that is blatantly trying to alter the outcome of an election, is only targeting one side, and doing so with the help of enemies of the USA then no...it can't be defended.

it's one thing for the NYT to do this and to do it in the right way. it's a whole different ballgame when these guys are doing it with ulterior motives.

You just described CNN/ABC/NBC/CBS/NYT/WaPo.

(08-26-2016 11:24 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:20 AM)Greenroom Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:17 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 09:14 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 08:49 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  I prefer "Patriotic American" as the descriptor of those not buying into Assaunge/Putin's attempts to influence the US Presidential election for their own ends.

Just more proof that you dont understand the word patriotism.

A patriot would be concerned about ABC/NBC/CBS/CNN efforts to influence the US presidential election for their own ends and ignoring the massive corruption and repeated failures and lies of Hillary Clinton.

Just wondering why Fox/FoxNews is also not on this list. You do not think they are biased towards the TGOP?
Hint they are.. and they shape views for the TGOP. FoxNews is MSM no matter how much they try to deny it.

They are. And while their motto is "Fair and Balanced," they don't try to hide what they are. They actually do have some occasional balance. Also, they really aren't a GOP organization. They represent the conservative wing of the GOP and are very critical of the party at times, in contrast to the other media groups who avoid saying anything negative about Democrats and who pretend to be objective. Fox was more critical of Christie and Jeb than the DNC spin media groups were, although that was on talk shows, not during alleged news reporting.

are you f***ing kidding me with that sentence? I mean did you really just say that? like those words were in your head and you thought: that's something that sounds reasonable to say.

(08-26-2016 11:23 AM)john01992 Wrote:  you are propping up someone who has threatened to release blueprints for nuclear weapons in order to bring world leaders to his knees and has repeatedly put govt assets in real danger. it's astounding that the cons defend him.

#teamovercountry

You are propping up someone who has released vast amount of American secrets, undermined the justice system, supported giving hundreds of millions of dollars and a green light for a terrorist government to develop nuclear weapons, abandoned US diplomats to die and with an open door immigration policy wants to put every single one of us at greater risk of terror attack.

Hard to find a better enemy of the US than Hillary Clinton.

(08-26-2016 11:26 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:21 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:08 AM)solohawks Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:05 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:03 AM)solohawks Wrote:  Well when you are the world's only superpower you are going to get extra scrutiny?

As an American citizen I applaud all efforts to clean up our act and weed out any corruption we can.

it's pathetic that the cons defend this.

I can't think of a more blatant example of #teamovercountry

saying the US government should be less corrupt is team over country? I dont care who is in office I am against corruption.

if it comes from a source that is blatantly trying to alter the outcome of an election, is only targeting one side, and doing so with the help of enemies of the USA then no...it can't be defended.

it's one thing for the NYT to do this and to do it in the right way. it's a whole different ballgame when these guys are doing it with ulterior motives.

You just described CNN/ABC/NBC/CBS/NYT/WaPo.

not at all. those outlets release information for the sake of allowing the public to learn about the issue. they also release the information safely to keep people from being put in danger.

what JA is doing is releasing information at the most strategic time possible to inflict maximum damage possible. he is also slowly releasing it bit by bit to make sure it does maximum damage possible.

look at the panama papers. there is a massive difference between how those docs were released and these docs. anyone who can't see the difference might as well not understand white from black or night vs day.

(08-26-2016 11:20 AM)Greenroom Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:17 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 09:14 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 08:49 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  I prefer "Patriotic American" as the descriptor of those not buying into Assaunge/Putin's attempts to influence the US Presidential election for their own ends.

Just more proof that you dont understand the word patriotism.

A patriot would be concerned about ABC/NBC/CBS/CNN efforts to influence the US presidential election for their own ends and ignoring the massive corruption and repeated failures and lies of Hillary Clinton.

Just wondering why Fox/FoxNews is also not on this list. You do not think they are biased towards the TGOP?
Hint they are.. and they shape views for the TGOP. FoxNews is MSM no matter how much they try to deny it.

I'll be happy to agree that Fox is biased toward the republicans, if you are willing to admit that the others are biased toward the democrats.

(08-26-2016 11:26 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:24 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:20 AM)Greenroom Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:17 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 09:14 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Just more proof that you dont understand the word patriotism.

A patriot would be concerned about ABC/NBC/CBS/CNN efforts to influence the US presidential election for their own ends and ignoring the massive corruption and repeated failures and lies of Hillary Clinton.

Just wondering why Fox/FoxNews is also not on this list. You do not think they are biased towards the TGOP?
Hint they are.. and they shape views for the TGOP. FoxNews is MSM no matter how much they try to deny it.

They are. And while their motto is "Fair and Balanced," they don't try to hide what they are. They actually do have some occasional balance. Also, they really aren't a GOP organization. They represent the conservative wing of the GOP and are very critical of the party at times, in contrast to the other media groups who avoid saying anything negative about Democrats and who pretend to be objective. Fox was more critical of Christie and Jeb than the DNC spin media groups were, although that was on talk shows, not during alleged news reporting.

are you f***ing kidding me with that sentence? I mean did you really just say that? like those words were in your head and you thought: that's something that sounds reasonable to say.

You are just demonstrating that you usually are incapable of independent thought. Only what is given by your spin masters at the DNC. Does Fox ever deny that they lean right?

(08-26-2016 11:29 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:26 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:21 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:08 AM)solohawks Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:05 AM)john01992 Wrote:  it's pathetic that the cons defend this.

I can't think of a more blatant example of #teamovercountry

saying the US government should be less corrupt is team over country? I dont care who is in office I am against corruption.

if it comes from a source that is blatantly trying to alter the outcome of an election, is only targeting one side, and doing so with the help of enemies of the USA then no...it can't be defended.

it's one thing for the NYT to do this and to do it in the right way. it's a whole different ballgame when these guys are doing it with ulterior motives.

You just described CNN/ABC/NBC/CBS/NYT/WaPo.

not at all. those outlets release information for the sake of allowing the public to learn about the issue. they also release the information safely to keep people from being put in danger.

what JA is doing is releasing information at the most strategic time possible to inflict maximum damage possible. he is also slowly releasing it bit by bit to make sure it does maximum damage possible.

look at the panama papers. there is a massive difference between how those docs were released and these docs. anyone who can't see the difference might as well not understand white from black or night vs day.

Well Hillary could have released some of it herself, but it is outrageous and should damage her. You are buying the spin that its about JA and the Russians. That's like saying we should blame the Russians if they secretly leaked that Bill Clinton really did order the murder of those 170 Clinton associates who have died mysteriously.

(08-26-2016 11:31 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:26 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:24 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:20 AM)Greenroom Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:17 AM)bullet Wrote:  A patriot would be concerned about ABC/NBC/CBS/CNN efforts to influence the US presidential election for their own ends and ignoring the massive corruption and repeated failures and lies of Hillary Clinton.

Just wondering why Fox/FoxNews is also not on this list. You do not think they are biased towards the TGOP?
Hint they are.. and they shape views for the TGOP. FoxNews is MSM no matter how much they try to deny it.

They are. And while their motto is "Fair and Balanced," they don't try to hide what they are. They actually do have some occasional balance. Also, they really aren't a GOP organization. They represent the conservative wing of the GOP and are very critical of the party at times, in contrast to the other media groups who avoid saying anything negative about Democrats and who pretend to be objective. Fox was more critical of Christie and Jeb than the DNC spin media groups were, although that was on talk shows, not during alleged news reporting.

are you f***ing kidding me with that sentence? I mean did you really just say that? like those words were in your head and you thought: that's something that sounds reasonable to say.

You are just demonstrating that you usually are incapable of independent thought. Only what is given by your spin masters at the DNC. Does Fox ever deny that they lean right?

yep! Hell, last time I checked, dont FoxNews have some news anchors that are very left?

(08-26-2016 11:10 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 11:05 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 10:53 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 10:33 AM)ODU BLUE Wrote:  I didn't like this guy at first, but I have come to realize that he represents the only real investigative journalism jeft. The mainstream media has been hijacked by those in power. He's a throwback to when real journalist reported on our government. They dug deep for the American people and kept their sources confidential.

He only investigates the USA. That's it. He's not a real journalist.

Isn't that a big enough target to occupy his full attention?

Not if he doesn't want to be biased. And lets not pretend that WL releases everything. They filter it.

And its done not to expose the USA's faults, but to harm the USA. A secret cable from a political attache in Venezuela telling the US Dept of State about their thoughts on a particular candidate that might win office should remain private. All countries need to have an idea about the people they might need to deal with.

WL isn't trying to increase transparency. They're trying to harm the USA. They don't support freedom...but want to harm the USA.

That's all they are. Full stop.

Translated...Assange is going after Queen Zero and I don't like it.

(08-26-2016 11:19 AM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 09:17 AM)green Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 08:49 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  I prefer "Patriotic American" as the descriptor of those not buying into Assaunge/Putin's attempts to influence the US Presidential election for their own ends.

how do you sleep ...

The answer to your question lies within