(08-31-2016 10:40 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(08-31-2016 10:33 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(08-31-2016 10:31 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  UCONN beats Houston and Westhoff proclaims UCONN to be the worst football program ever in the entire history of college football.

Ummm no I proclaimed them to have bad football, not " the worst football program ever in the entire history of college football". Someone is butt hurt....

Yeah you are. I'm not sure why though. After all Houston has never made a bad hire and have never ever finished below .500 ever in their entire history.

Ok what does that have to do with UCONN not being a great football program exactly? Yous still haven't proved that UCONN is a better football candidate for Big 12 expansion compared to any of the teams being considered other than maybe 4.

lol I'm not the one upset at all your the one blasting it on here with made up things that I said. I would say that is the definition of butt hurt.

(08-31-2016 10:47 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(08-31-2016 10:40 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(08-31-2016 10:33 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(08-31-2016 10:31 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  UCONN beats Houston and Westhoff proclaims UCONN to be the worst football program ever in the entire history of college football.

Ummm no I proclaimed them to have bad football, not " the worst football program ever in the entire history of college football". Someone is butt hurt....

Yeah you are. I'm not sure why though. After all Houston has never made a bad hire and have never ever finished below .500 ever in their entire history.

Ok what does that have to do with UCONN not being a great football program exactly? Yous still haven't proved that UCONN is a better football candidate for Big 12 expansion compared to any of the teams being considered other than maybe 4.

lol I'm not the one upset at all your the one blasting it on here with made up things that I said. I would say that is the definition of butt hurt.

UCONN had a rebound year last year and has been good to really good in the pre-Pasqualoni years. But all you do is point to 2011-2014 as proof that UCONN has never been good and will never be good. But Houston in your eyes has never been bad ever and will always be a top-15 program. That's not making assumptions that's called reading comprehension.

(08-31-2016 11:07 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(08-31-2016 10:47 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(08-31-2016 10:40 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(08-31-2016 10:33 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(08-31-2016 10:31 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  UCONN beats Houston and Westhoff proclaims UCONN to be the worst football program ever in the entire history of college football.

Ummm no I proclaimed them to have bad football, not " the worst football program ever in the entire history of college football". Someone is butt hurt....

Yeah you are. I'm not sure why though. After all Houston has never made a bad hire and have never ever finished below .500 ever in their entire history.

Ok what does that have to do with UCONN not being a great football program exactly? Yous still haven't proved that UCONN is a better football candidate for Big 12 expansion compared to any of the teams being considered other than maybe 4.

lol I'm not the one upset at all your the one blasting it on here with made up things that I said. I would say that is the definition of butt hurt.

UCONN had a rebound year last year and has been good to really good in the pre-Pasqualoni years. But all you do is point to 2011-2014 as proof that UCONN has never been good and will never be good. But Houston in your eyes has never been bad ever and will always be a top-15 program. That's not making assumptions that's called reading comprehension.

Lol wow defconnone you need to take a break from here because now your just being silly. Where did i say any of that exactly?

Also your best season you won 9 games. Your school has never won more than 9 games so how is that really good? Even when you made the fiesta bowl you only won 8 games. That was a good team but not great and OU basically proved that when they destroyed you.

Also where exactly have i indicated that i'm only talking about 2011-2014? I'm pretty sure the statement "you have never won a major bowl" would include your entire history.

You do know what the definition of reading comprehension is right? Just incase you forgot here is a link to the definition: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reading_comprehension "Reading comprehension is the ability to read text, process it, and understand its meaning."

So the fact that you got "But Houston in your eyes has never been bad ever and will always be a top-15 program." out of what i have posted in fact shows you might lack reading comprehension lmao!

Sooooo, about that weather...crazy isn't it!

(09-01-2016 03:03 AM)Puckhead48E Wrote:  Sooooo, about that weather...crazy isn't it!

Its black like my soul...

Houston will win the West and South Florida will win the East.

Overall I think that Houston will be as good as last year, although they will likely lose two games vs the one that they lost last year.

The "better" teams include Central Florida, ECU, Tulane, SMU, UConn and Tulsa.

Temple will take a slight step back but still be good. The same can be said for Navy.

Cincinnati will be mediocre and at the end of the season, they will make a change at the top.

Surprise team of the year: Memphis. They will win 8 games and narrowly lose to Houston, in a season that some thought would be a rebuilding year.

As a conference, the AAC will finish with at least 8 bowl-eligible teams, likely 9.