Thank you, Judicial Watch!

Quote:A federal judge in Washington, D.C. ruled Friday that Hillary Clinton must answer written questions from a group that filed a lawsuit over her private email server.

Lawyers for Judicial Watch, a conservative government watchdog organization, asked to interview her under oath as part of their Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the State Department.

But Judge Emmet Sullivan said Friday that the group “has failed to demonstrate that it cannot obtain the discovery it seeks through other, less burdensome or intrusive means such as interrogatories.”

He gave the group until October 14 to give her the questions, and she has 30 days to answer them.

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/judg...it-n634701

(08-19-2016 06:18 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  Thank you, Judicial Watch!

Quote:A federal judge in Washington, D.C. ruled Friday that Hillary Clinton must answer written questions from a group that filed a lawsuit over her private email server.

Lawyers for Judicial Watch, a conservative government watchdog organization, asked to interview her under oath as part of their Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the State Department.

But Judge Emmet Sullivan said Friday that the group “has failed to demonstrate that it cannot obtain the discovery it seeks through other, less burdensome or intrusive means such as interrogatories.”

He gave the group until October 14 to give her the questions, and she has 30 days to answer them.

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/judg...it-n634701

Meh, assuming no appeal, the questions will not be released until after the election.

Allowing a private group of Hillary haters the ability to go on a fishing expedition is kind of dumb.

(08-19-2016 06:24 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(08-19-2016 06:18 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  Thank you, Judicial Watch!

Quote:A federal judge in Washington, D.C. ruled Friday that Hillary Clinton must answer written questions from a group that filed a lawsuit over her private email server.

Lawyers for Judicial Watch, a conservative government watchdog organization, asked to interview her under oath as part of their Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the State Department.

But Judge Emmet Sullivan said Friday that the group “has failed to demonstrate that it cannot obtain the discovery it seeks through other, less burdensome or intrusive means such as interrogatories.”

He gave the group until October 14 to give her the questions, and she has 30 days to answer them.

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/judg...it-n634701

Meh, assuming no appeal, the questions will not be released until after the election.

Allowing a private group of Hillary haters the ability to go on a fishing expedition is kind of dumb.

The American Voting public has a right to know before the election. This is not like having to pass Obamacare before finding whats really in it. She has Serious issues She still hasn't come clean with. Cover ups are very bad problems to deal with afterwards. It would create market crashes and job losses like after Watergate did. Funny that's where She got Her start. Coming full circle with Her tainted career.

(08-19-2016 06:24 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Meh, assuming no appeal, the questions will not be released until after the election.

Allowing a private group of Hillary haters the ability to go on a fishing expedition is kind of dumb.

as the judge attests ...
it's not a frivolous matter ...
upon receipt of the questions ...
ms. clinton has 30 days to answer ...
she can ask for a delay ...
but how will it look ...
there's that word again ...

OPTICS