A blast from the past...

Quote:By Karen Tumulty May 13, 2014
Is Hillary Rodham Clinton healthy enough to be president — or is the prospect of her candidacy so formidable that she’s driving her adversaries to desperation?

If Clinton decides to run in 2016, her age and health are certain to be talked about, given that she would be vying to become the second-oldest person in history to be elected. She would be 69, only a little younger than Ronald Reagan when he won his first term in 1980.

What had been only a secondary issue, compared with the prospect of electing the first female president, has suddenly burst to the fore. On Tuesday, the New York Post ran a provocative headline: “Karl Rove: Hillary may have brain damage.”

The newspaper reported that George W. Bush’s former chief strategist suggested as much at a recent conference near Los Angeles.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/...story.html

Donald John Trump
June 14, 1946 (age 70)

Hillary Diane Rodham
October 26, 1947 (age 68)

Hillary will not be a candidate in 2020.

(08-09-2016 04:11 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Donald John Trump
June 14, 1946 (age 70)

Hillary Diane Rodham
October 26, 1947 (age 68)

Trumps physical age (40)

Hillarys physical age (127)

It's a legitimate issue.

When Hillary left the Obama administration there were questions about her health. She's only deteriorated since then.

if you are Trump's people, do you bring it up?

According to Huma, Hillary is often confused and needs lots of naps. That is not good. She isn't all there.

(08-09-2016 04:23 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 04:11 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Donald John Trump
June 14, 1946 (age 70)

Hillary Diane Rodham
October 26, 1947 (age 68)

Trumps physical age (40) 21

Hillarys physical age (127)

FIFY

Clinton will almost certainly get to appoint as many as four Supreme Court justices during her Presidency. If she does that, what does 2020 even mean? It's almost irrelevant on the national stage when everything important nowadays is decided in SC decision.

(08-09-2016 04:39 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  Clinton will almost certainly get to appoint as many as four Supreme Court justices during her Presidency. If she does that, what does 2020 even mean? It's almost irrelevant on the national stage when everything important nowadays is decided in SC decision.

You should have advocated for Garland when you had the chance.