You should change your user name to Sheldon Cooper. He's more like you.

(08-09-2016 01:01 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 12:59 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 12:56 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 12:55 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 12:41 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  Have they all come out and said that they are not voting for Trump?

you seriously must have a zero literacy news rate. warrens speech was talked about on this forum. Bloomberg gave a primetime speech at the DNC, & Cuban has bashed trump on twitter and TV for months. the 50 GOPers are from a signed letter. the four congressmen all gave either OP eds of TV interviews to dicuss their position.

you have to be the most dense person I have ever encountered on the internet. that is quite an accomplishment considering I had to deal with LSU & Okie

links?

if you are too lazy (or dumb) to read the news or read this forum, that is your fault. all of these were major headline stories from the last few days to the DNC.

I have a life outside of this forum, not lazy or dumb (can say the same about you though).

So, once again, you fail to provide links and are simply talking out of your ass...

I know plenty of people who can be social/active and still be bothered to be aware of the major news stories. and by "plenty" I mean everyone.

you could have taken 5 seconds to google any of those but you choose not to. let's face it...you are lazy or too partisan to be taken seriously if you refuse to read the news and refuse to verify on your own what someone else says.

Typical libturds. They try to start a thread demonizing Trump, then get all butthurt when it blows up in their face.

Susan Collins said she's voting Libertarian.

So now they are major news stories?



Ok, so if it would only take 5 seconds to google them, why didnt you google them and provided the links? You were the one that made the claim john, its your job to prove them. Not mine buddy.

(08-09-2016 01:08 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Typical libturds. They try to start a thread demonizing Trump, then get all butthurt when it blows up in their face.

how annoyed would you be when the other side blatantly ignores facts because it goes against their political views?

oh yeah I forgot...according to you asking the cons to be fair, educated, and not be a prick is called being butthurt.

(08-09-2016 01:08 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  Susan Collins said she's voting Libertarian.

power to the people ...

WHO CARES

(08-09-2016 01:09 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  So now they are major news stories?



Ok, so if it would only take 5 seconds to google them, why didnt you google them and provided the links? You were the one that made the claim john, its your job to prove them. Not mine buddy.

YES....THEY....ARE. The 50 GOP thing was the top story on NBC after the Olympics and was the frontpage headline on major media outlets such as CNN within the last 24 hours.

to your bold part ==> do I have to post a source just to prove gravity exists every time I engage with you? let's be reasonable here, there is absolutely no way you can say the reason you asked for a link was because it was unreasonable to know. you asked for a link purely to be a prick and to be difficult.

(08-09-2016 01:14 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 01:09 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  So now they are major news stories?



Ok, so if it would only take 5 seconds to google them, why didnt you google them and provided the links? You were the one that made the claim john, its your job to prove them. Not mine buddy.

YES....THEY....ARE. The 50 GOP thing was the top story on NBC after the Olympics and was the frontpage headline on major media outlets such as CNN within the last 24 hours.

to your bold part ==> do I have to post a source just to prove gravity exists every time I engage with you? let's be reasonable here, there is absolutely no way you can say the reason you asked for a link was because it was unreasonable to know. you asked for a link purely to be a prick and to be difficult.

Are you saying that gravity was just discovered a couple of days ago???



and I am just returning the favor, you ask for sources and links too, dont get your panties in a bunch when people also ask you for sources. Not being a prick at all, but if you think I am, I am pretty sure you can find a safe space that you can go hide.

(08-09-2016 01:19 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 01:14 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 01:09 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  So now they are major news stories?



Ok, so if it would only take 5 seconds to google them, why didnt you google them and provided the links? You were the one that made the claim john, its your job to prove them. Not mine buddy.

YES....THEY....ARE. The 50 GOP thing was the top story on NBC after the Olympics and was the frontpage headline on major media outlets such as CNN within the last 24 hours.

to your bold part ==> do I have to post a source just to prove gravity exists every time I engage with you? let's be reasonable here, there is absolutely no way you can say the reason you asked for a link was because it was unreasonable to know. you asked for a link purely to be a prick and to be difficult.

Are you saying that gravity was just discovered a couple of days ago???



and I am just returning the favor, you ask for sources and links too, dont get your panties in a bunch when people also ask you for sources. Not being a prick at all, but if you think I am, I am pretty sure you can find a safe space that you can go hide.

I ask for sources/links to something I can't find on my own or things that are rather obscure like a study or op ed. you are asking for major (and recent) high profile news stories and are too much of a hack to understand the difference.

not one of your fellow cons has denied these things happened, in fact the last con to post acknowledge that one of them did happen.

now I know you are both incredibly uneducated and incredibly lazy.

Benghazi

(08-09-2016 01:25 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 01:19 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 01:14 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 01:09 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  So now they are major news stories?



Ok, so if it would only take 5 seconds to google them, why didnt you google them and provided the links? You were the one that made the claim john, its your job to prove them. Not mine buddy.

YES....THEY....ARE. The 50 GOP thing was the top story on NBC after the Olympics and was the frontpage headline on major media outlets such as CNN within the last 24 hours.

to your bold part ==> do I have to post a source just to prove gravity exists every time I engage with you? let's be reasonable here, there is absolutely no way you can say the reason you asked for a link was because it was unreasonable to know. you asked for a link purely to be a prick and to be difficult.

Are you saying that gravity was just discovered a couple of days ago???



and I am just returning the favor, you ask for sources and links too, dont get your panties in a bunch when people also ask you for sources. Not being a prick at all, but if you think I am, I am pretty sure you can find a safe space that you can go hide.

I ask for sources/links to something I can't find on my own or things that are rather obscure like a study or op ed. you are asking for major (and recent) high profile news stories and are too much of a hack to understand the difference.

not one of your fellow cons has denied these things happened, in fact the last con to post acknowledge that one of them did happen.

now I know you are both incredibly uneducated and incredibly lazy.

they might be major news to you, but they are not to me. Maybe your clinton news network tried to air those news, which I dont watch.

The poster might have acknowledge one of them, but you made 4 claims. So I am still waiting for those links. If you dont want to provide the links, just say so, dont get all pissy about it and start calling people names.

Funny though, a sign of an uneducated person is one that usually resorts to name calling after they lose a discussion.

(08-09-2016 01:11 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 01:08 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Typical libturds. They try to start a thread demonizing Trump, then get all butthurt when it blows up in their face.

how annoyed would you be when the other side blatantly ignores facts because it goes against their political views?

Well, to be honest, BOTH sides do that. It's the primary reason nothing every gets done.

(08-09-2016 12:51 PM)john01992 Wrote:  when a candidate has held no political office and is running on his business record...then yes, billionaires saying he is a bad businessman is as relevant as it gets.

And I like to think of the pro-Hillary crowd as the “let's put a corrupt serial liar in the White House" faction.

(08-09-2016 12:51 PM)john01992 Wrote:  same with GOP security officials and congressmen putting the country above partisan politics by openly calling out Trump is again pretty damn relevant.

How convenient that those " putting the country above partisan politics" are anti-Trump and have nothing to say about abandoning Iraq to ISIS and Afghanistan to the Taliban, about expanding drone usage, about unsecured emails almost certainly in the hands of foreign intelligence, about how a certain candidate personally profited from foreign contributions to her family foundation. That can’t possibly be relevant to foreign affairs, no way no sir no how.

As I’ve always said, without double standards, progressives would have NO standards.

(08-09-2016 01:34 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 01:25 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 01:19 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 01:14 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 01:09 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  So now they are major news stories?



Ok, so if it would only take 5 seconds to google them, why didnt you google them and provided the links? You were the one that made the claim john, its your job to prove them. Not mine buddy.

YES....THEY....ARE. The 50 GOP thing was the top story on NBC after the Olympics and was the frontpage headline on major media outlets such as CNN within the last 24 hours.

to your bold part ==> do I have to post a source just to prove gravity exists every time I engage with you? let's be reasonable here, there is absolutely no way you can say the reason you asked for a link was because it was unreasonable to know. you asked for a link purely to be a prick and to be difficult.

Are you saying that gravity was just discovered a couple of days ago???



and I am just returning the favor, you ask for sources and links too, dont get your panties in a bunch when people also ask you for sources. Not being a prick at all, but if you think I am, I am pretty sure you can find a safe space that you can go hide.

I ask for sources/links to something I can't find on my own or things that are rather obscure like a study or op ed. you are asking for major (and recent) high profile news stories and are too much of a hack to understand the difference.

not one of your fellow cons has denied these things happened, in fact the last con to post acknowledge that one of them did happen.

now I know you are both incredibly uneducated and incredibly lazy.

they might be major news to you, but they are not to me. Maybe your clinton news network tried to air those news, which I dont watch.

The poster might have acknowledge one of them, but you made 4 claims. So I am still waiting for those links. If you dont want to provide the links, just say so, dont get all pissy about it and start calling people names.

Funny though, a sign of an uneducated person is one that usually resorts to name calling after they lose a discussion.

I just google it: here is who covered (names I recognized) it after clicking on five pages using two different keyterms:

CNN
NYT
NBC
CBS
ABC
washpo
US News
huffington
business insider
time
politico
WSJ
msn
msnba
military.com
dailymail
telegraph
yahoo
gawker
breibart (whose well known for their pro clinton bias)
fox news (whose well known for their pro clinton bias)
USA Today
the hill
boston globe
bloomberg
LA times
conservativetribune
rawstory
the week
syracuse.com
wral
nj.com
pitt gazatte
aol.com
thedailybeast
mediate
salon
guardian
BBC
UPI
gateway
inside edition

so yes...do tell how only cnn covered this. and FYI I only namecall when someone truly deserves it. you are lazy when you refused to educate yourself on something you didn't know. you are uneducated for being unaware of eight major news stories all of which received considerable coverage.

Here's the one about the 50 GOP security experts and Senator Susan Collins' op ed. I didn't find the one about some House Members not voting for him, but I think I did see part of an interview with one of them the other day.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/50-gop-securi...00128.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/...story.html

(08-09-2016 01:37 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(08-09-2016 12:51 PM)john01992 Wrote:  when a candidate has held no political office and is running on his business record...then yes, billionaires saying he is a bad businessman is as relevant as it gets.

And I like to think of the pro-Hillary crowd as the “let's put a corrupt serial liar in the White House" faction.

(08-09-2016 12:51 PM)john01992 Wrote:  same with GOP security officials and congressmen putting the country above partisan politics by openly calling out Trump is again pretty damn relevant.

How convenient that those " putting the country above partisan politics" are anti-Trump and have nothing to say about abandoning Iraq to ISIS and Afghanistan to the Taliban, about expanding drone usage, about unsecured emails almost certainly in the hands of foreign intelligence, about how a certain candidate personally profited from foreign contributions to her family foundation. That can’t possibly be relevant to foreign affairs, no way no sir no how.

As I’ve always said, without double standards, progressives would have NO standards.

ISIS is losing ground and has been for some time. but that won't stop the fear mongering coming from the right.

the other stuff are IMO reach scandals. The idea that a former FL would engage in for profit corruption is ludicrous. they are set $$$ for life do to book deals and you really want to suggest that at the height of her political career she is going to engage in that sort of stuff? it concerns me more than the other stuff but it doesn't really add up.

the email stuff is again grasping for straws. yes I think she did something unethical. but no I don't think she is any different from Obama, bush, other clinton etc. with how many internal memos they make sure stays out of the hands of the public. let's face it. the cons were looking to nail her from day one and kept digging until they could find something with traction.