Bwahahahah!

Anonymous are crooked as well, and some of their members don't care if they hack into something that someone's life is depending on.

Damn!

(08-08-2016 07:21 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  Anonymous are crooked as well, and some of their members don't care if they hack into something that someone's life is depending on.

So does that make the information true or false?

It could be false. Anonymous posted online all the hacked personal information of police officers including phone numbers, street address es where they live and so forth. They do not care if the police officers are good cops, and it put the lives of their families in danger because of it.

But was the contact info accurate?

Well anonymous has chosen a good movie as a theme. On just last night.

Just googled it. Any media outlets covering the now 4 day old internet rumors?

This doesn't seem to be correct.

First, Khan wouldn't need money to take down Trump.
Secondly, one would think that even far right news outlets would be taking off with this. I just don't see it.

Just like with Bill Maher and the Clinton foundation, it looks like false information.

----

BTW, it looks like Assaunge/Putin/Anonymous are done with real leaks and are just making stuff up.

(08-08-2016 07:34 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(08-08-2016 07:21 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  Anonymous are crooked as well, and some of their members don't care if they hack into something that someone's life is depending on.

So does that make the information true or false?

The video seems to just pass on what looks like a hoax.

Khizr Khan Received $375,000 from the Clinton Foundation : snopes.com

http://www.snopes.com/khizr-khan-375000-...oundation/ Wrote:The document appears to be a Wells Fargo Business Market Savings account statement for the KM Khan Law Office, address listed as 415 Madison Ave., Suite 1500, New York, NY. In the transaction history is an 8/1 "Clinton foundation incoming wire" entry credited in the amount of $375,000. One of the first things you'll note about the document, however, is that it's heavily redacted — so heavily that you can't even find a complete date on it anywhere. The second thing you'll notice, if you look carefully, is that the business name is listed twice in the document, and the listings don't match.
First it's listed as "KM KHAN LAW OFFICE":

Then it's listed as "JM KHAN LAW OFFICE":

At some point as the image was being passed around and reposted, someone noticed the discrepancy and created a new version:

But if you'll notice, the new version has a defect as well: "KM KHAN LAW OFFICE" — singular — has now become "KM KHAN LAW OFFICES" — plural.

The version in the video has "KM KHAN LAW OFFICES" as the second address.

Thong in Lazybrook, of course no main stream media is going to cover this for a bit. You know that.

Beyond pathetic. Nate Silver has Trimps odds down to 12%. I guess the righties need fiction to pique their interests. Non fiction is too depressing for them.

(08-08-2016 09:56 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Beyond pathetic. Nate Silver has Trimps odds down to 12%. I guess the righties need fiction to pique their interests. Non fiction is too depressing for them.

His own words will be his undoing. 1983 were part of the "good years"

(08-08-2016 09:56 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Beyond pathetic. Nate Silver has Trimps odds down to 12%. I guess the righties need fiction to pique their interests. Non fiction is too depressing for them.

isn't that what they always do?

(08-08-2016 10:07 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-08-2016 09:56 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Beyond pathetic. Nate Silver has Trimps odds down to 12%. I guess the righties need fiction to pique their interests. Non fiction is too depressing for them.

isn't that what they always do?

To be "published" is a goal for many a writer. How has Khan "evolved" from his earlier writings? What has happened to change his earlier point of view?

(08-08-2016 10:04 PM)Dasville Wrote:  

(08-08-2016 09:56 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Beyond pathetic. Nate Silver has Trimps odds down to 12%. I guess the righties need fiction to pique their interests. Non fiction is too depressing for them.

His own words will be his undoing. 1983 were part of the "good years"

?

Sent from my VS980 4G using CSNbbs mobile app

(08-08-2016 09:56 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Beyond pathetic. Nate Silver has Trimps odds down to 12%. I guess the righties need fiction to pique their interests. Non fiction is too depressing for them.

So what would you, in this present crap filled conundrum, do differently?!?

(08-08-2016 09:52 PM)I45owl Wrote:  The video seems to just pass on what looks like a hoax.

When the leftist at snopes say "UNPROVEN" and not "FALSE" I have a feeling it's true.

I call fabrics on this.