(08-01-2016 05:26 PM)YA! Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 03:32 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 03:27 PM)YA! Wrote:  Where have I been wrong? I told you there are schools like Texas and Tech playing the good cop routine to add houston knowing that there are enough no votes league wide to stop it. The Iowa State guy said the same thing. Now the TV partners are saying that houston adds no value. Plus, if is freaking laughable that you think the Texas Governor can force UT to sign off on houston being admitted.

You can get mad all you want, down vote me like a spoiled 5 year old. It doesn't change the facts that houston is not wanted and will never be in the Big 12 unless it is 14.

Tv partners never said Houston adds no value. Please provide that exact quote moron. Also please provide the exact quote were the Iowa state ad mentioned President mentioned Houston adding mo value I'll wait... If your going to troll use actual facts not your biased opinion.

Well the TV partners are balking about the Big 12 adding teams and the known candidates are BYU, Cincy, Memphis, Connecticut, UCF, USF and houston. It doesn't take a genius to figure out the TV partners don't want houston as they add NOTHING to the Big 12, hence "why" the TV partners are saying no to expansion.

If houston is added, it will be because the conference went to 14.

How do you know its has to do specifically with Houston please cite your sources or go away troll.

(08-01-2016 05:29 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 05:26 PM)YA! Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 03:32 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 03:27 PM)YA! Wrote:  Where have I been wrong? I told you there are schools like Texas and Tech playing the good cop routine to add houston knowing that there are enough no votes league wide to stop it. The Iowa State guy said the same thing. Now the TV partners are saying that houston adds no value. Plus, if is freaking laughable that you think the Texas Governor can force UT to sign off on houston being admitted.

You can get mad all you want, down vote me like a spoiled 5 year old. It doesn't change the facts that houston is not wanted and will never be in the Big 12 unless it is 14.

Tv partners never said Houston adds no value. Please provide that exact quote moron. Also please provide the exact quote were the Iowa state ad mentioned President mentioned Houston adding mo value I'll wait... If your going to troll use actual facts not your biased opinion.

Well the TV partners are balking about the Big 12 adding teams and the known candidates are BYU, Cincy, Memphis, Connecticut, UCF, USF and houston. It doesn't take a genius to figure out the TV partners don't want houston as they add NOTHING to the Big 12, hence "why" the TV partners are saying no to expansion.

If houston is added, it will be because the conference went to 14.

How do you know its has to do specifically with Houston please cite your sources or go away troll.

lol haven't seen that douchebag here in ages

(08-01-2016 05:32 PM)ShockerBob Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 05:29 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 05:26 PM)YA! Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 03:32 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 03:27 PM)YA! Wrote:  Where have I been wrong? I told you there are schools like Texas and Tech playing the good cop routine to add houston knowing that there are enough no votes league wide to stop it. The Iowa State guy said the same thing. Now the TV partners are saying that houston adds no value. Plus, if is freaking laughable that you think the Texas Governor can force UT to sign off on houston being admitted.

You can get mad all you want, down vote me like a spoiled 5 year old. It doesn't change the facts that houston is not wanted and will never be in the Big 12 unless it is 14.

Tv partners never said Houston adds no value. Please provide that exact quote moron. Also please provide the exact quote were the Iowa state ad mentioned President mentioned Houston adding mo value I'll wait... If your going to troll use actual facts not your biased opinion.

Well the TV partners are balking about the Big 12 adding teams and the known candidates are BYU, Cincy, Memphis, Connecticut, UCF, USF and houston. It doesn't take a genius to figure out the TV partners don't want houston as they add NOTHING to the Big 12, hence "why" the TV partners are saying no to expansion.

If houston is added, it will be because the conference went to 14.

How do you know its has to do specifically with Houston please cite your sources or go away troll.

lol haven't seen that douchebag here in ages

I agree with you lol what a troll.

(07-29-2016 11:27 AM)8BitPirate Wrote:  This good or bad?

Its neither...its the AD at Iowa State flapping his gums. He doesn't call the shots. The presidents do. Case in point: the AD's didn't even know they were going to spend a full day on expansion this past B12 media days, it took them ALL by surprise.

nothing to see here...

(08-01-2016 05:29 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 05:26 PM)YA! Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 03:32 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 03:27 PM)YA! Wrote:  Where have I been wrong? I told you there are schools like Texas and Tech playing the good cop routine to add houston knowing that there are enough no votes league wide to stop it. The Iowa State guy said the same thing. Now the TV partners are saying that houston adds no value. Plus, if is freaking laughable that you think the Texas Governor can force UT to sign off on houston being admitted.

You can get mad all you want, down vote me like a spoiled 5 year old. It doesn't change the facts that houston is not wanted and will never be in the Big 12 unless it is 14.

Tv partners never said Houston adds no value. Please provide that exact quote moron. Also please provide the exact quote were the Iowa state ad mentioned President mentioned Houston adding mo value I'll wait... If your going to troll use actual facts not your biased opinion.

Well the TV partners are balking about the Big 12 adding teams and the known candidates are BYU, Cincy, Memphis, Connecticut, UCF, USF and houston. It doesn't take a genius to figure out the TV partners don't want houston as they add NOTHING to the Big 12, hence "why" the TV partners are saying no to expansion.

If houston is added, it will be because the conference went to 14.

How do you know its has to do specifically with Houston please cite your sources or go away troll.

Well how many articles do you want posted that say the media partners do not want to add G5 teams? houston is a G5 team and they don't want to add any of y'all. Down vote me some more 25 year old who calls himself "that white guy" Why do you call yourself that BTW?

Get lost troll

I been here longer than 90% of the board. I just don't post very often and like to laugh at the delusions of the houston and smu fans. You houston boys don't like the truth and see your dream dying--I be pissed too. But, I have to say that I enjoy watching you guys squirm and justify your existence. Ever since the Texas bowl against y'all I have a special place in my heart for you to be on the losing end of everything. No big 12 and likely Herman is gone after this year as y'all limp to a bowl game.

(08-02-2016 03:45 PM)YA! Wrote:  I been here longer than 90% of the board. I just don't post very often and like to laugh at the delusions of the houston and smu fans. You houston boys don't like the truth and see your dream dying--I be pissed too. But, I have to say that I enjoy watching you guys squirm and justify your existence. Ever since the Texas bowl against y'all I have a special place in my heart for you to be on the losing end of everything. No big 12 and likely Herman is gone after this year as y'all limp to a bowl game.

I like laughing at you trolling us. We been left out before, we will live either way. I think we do all right in picking our coaches. other than Levine we have done pretty good. If we lose Herman we will get another coach. Kind of hard to be denied when you keep winning.

(08-02-2016 03:51 PM)billetingman1 Wrote:  

(08-02-2016 03:45 PM)YA! Wrote:  I been here longer than 90% of the board. I just don't post very often and like to laugh at the delusions of the houston and smu fans. You houston boys don't like the truth and see your dream dying--I be pissed too. But, I have to say that I enjoy watching you guys squirm and justify your existence. Ever since the Texas bowl against y'all I have a special place in my heart for you to be on the losing end of everything. No big 12 and likely Herman is gone after this year as y'all limp to a bowl game.

I like laughing at you trolling us. We been left out before, we will live either way. I think we do all right in picking our coaches. other than Levine we have done pretty good. If we lose Herman we will get another coach. Kind of hard to be denied when you keep winning.

I agree with this. UH has done an awesome job picking coaches, they will be fine either way.

(08-02-2016 03:45 PM)YA! Wrote:  I been here longer than 90% of the board. I just don't post very often and like to laugh at the delusions of the houston and smu fans. You houston boys don't like the truth and see your dream dying--I be pissed too. But, I have to say that I enjoy watching you guys squirm and justify your existence. Ever since the Texas bowl against y'all I have a special place in my heart for you to be on the losing end of everything. No big 12 and likely Herman is gone after this year as y'all limp to a bowl game.

As long as you keep trolling ill keep neg repping you, eventually you will get banned.

LULZ at Iowa State demanding anything....I think they need to realize that they along with K State and probably KU and TT have a good shot of being left out in the cold in a couple years.

Play ball my dudes.

(08-02-2016 04:56 PM)tmoney86 Wrote:  LULZ at Iowa State demanding anything....I think they need to realize that they along with K State and probably KU and TT have a good shot of being left out in the cold in a couple years.

Play ball my dudes.

KU isn't getting left out of anything

(08-02-2016 02:05 PM)YA! Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 05:29 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 05:26 PM)YA! Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 03:32 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 03:27 PM)YA! Wrote:  Where have I been wrong? I told you there are schools like Texas and Tech playing the good cop routine to add houston knowing that there are enough no votes league wide to stop it. The Iowa State guy said the same thing. Now the TV partners are saying that houston adds no value. Plus, if is freaking laughable that you think the Texas Governor can force UT to sign off on houston being admitted.

You can get mad all you want, down vote me like a spoiled 5 year old. It doesn't change the facts that houston is not wanted and will never be in the Big 12 unless it is 14.

Tv partners never said Houston adds no value. Please provide that exact quote moron. Also please provide the exact quote were the Iowa state ad mentioned President mentioned Houston adding mo value I'll wait... If your going to troll use actual facts not your biased opinion.

Well the TV partners are balking about the Big 12 adding teams and the known candidates are BYU, Cincy, Memphis, Connecticut, UCF, USF and houston. It doesn't take a genius to figure out the TV partners don't want houston as they add NOTHING to the Big 12, hence "why" the TV partners are saying no to expansion.

If houston is added, it will be because the conference went to 14.

How do you know its has to do specifically with Houston please cite your sources or go away troll.

Well how many articles do you want posted that say the media partners do not want to add G5 teams? houston is a G5 team and they don't want to add any of y'all. Down vote me some more 25 year old who calls himself "that white guy" Why do you call yourself that BTW?

well good thing that wasn't their stance when you guys came from the G5 just a few years ago, ace