(07-19-2016 12:32 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(07-19-2016 10:59 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(07-19-2016 10:53 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Has it been determined that it was diliberate?

You cannot be serious with this question right?

He continually proves his lack of common sense and intelligence. I do doubt even he didn't ask that question not knowing the answer. His mission is to try and defend those that hate and bring harm to police. He could care less about this officer's injuries.

Read the article it clearly says that detectives do not know if it was accidental or intentional.

(07-19-2016 12:37 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-19-2016 12:32 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(07-19-2016 10:59 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(07-19-2016 10:53 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Has it been determined that it was diliberate?

You cannot be serious with this question right?

He continually proves his lack of common sense and intelligence. I do doubt even he didn't ask that question not knowing the answer. His mission is to try and defend those that hate and bring harm to police. He could care less about this officer's injuries.

Read the article it clearly says that detectives do not know if it was accidental or intentional.

so what you are saying is that glass just happen to break and find its way in the officer's food, accidentally?

(07-19-2016 12:41 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(07-19-2016 12:37 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-19-2016 12:32 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(07-19-2016 10:59 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(07-19-2016 10:53 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Has it been determined that it was diliberate?

You cannot be serious with this question right?

He continually proves his lack of common sense and intelligence. I do doubt even he didn't ask that question not knowing the answer. His mission is to try and defend those that hate and bring harm to police. He could care less about this officer's injuries.

Read the article it clearly says that detectives do not know if it was accidental or intentional.

so what you are saying is that glass just happen to break and find its way in the officer's food, accidentally?

Thats not what I am saying. Thats what detectives who are actually there are saying.

The restaurant has been identified. It bills itself as a "progressive coffee house" . What a shock.

(07-19-2016 10:28 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(07-19-2016 05:38 AM)HappyAppy Wrote:  The kind of person who shoots a bunch of cops, or puts glass in someone's sandwich, obviously has a screw loose. They didn't get that way because of some comments from Obama.

Nobody ever said it was just Obama making a few comments. The argument is that the tone set by the left, as a whole, has contributed to this.

"Hands up don't shoot" never happened but the left took it and ran with it before any facts were out.

Quote:If Obama said exactly what most of you wanted him to say (guessing that would be blindly praising all cops and calling BLM a terrorist group), these deranged individuals wouldn't magically become well functioning members of society.

You know the left went bat-shaq crazy over Palin using the word "targeted district" when Giffords got shot. Are you going to pretend that did not happen?

http://nypost.com/2011/01/09/calls-to-co...-shooting/

Quote:

Quote:Sen. Dick Durbin, the second-ranking Democratic leader in the Senate, today cited imagery of crosshairs on political opponents and Sarah Palin’s combative rallying cry, “Don’t retreat; reload.”

“These sorts of things, I think, invite the kind of toxic rhetoric that can lead unstable people to believe this is an acceptable response,” Durbin said Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

I think it's unfair to lay all of this at Obama's feet but he has had opportunities to diffuse tensions and never said, after a shooting, what needed to be said.

The stats show that during a police contact a white person is as likely to be shot as an African American. Let's get all the information on the events in *insert city* and be sure justice is swift, public, and true to the facts.

Quote:I also don't understand how in one breath many of you can blame the inflammatory rhetoric of Obama for these terrible acts, and in the next breath promote Trump as the next president. It's madness.

I'm not a trump supporter. His rhetoric is bafoonish on it's face. The problem with Obama is *1* the media parrots what he says (they will not do that with trump) and *2* he is a far more effective and believable communicator than Trump.

I am on the left, but I do have friends who are police officers. I blamed some people on the left for jumping on the gun before the facts came out. The is a difference between a bad cop like the one in South Carolina who shot an unarmed man from behind a different situation of the Minnesota case where Castile was shot while going for his wallet, but Castile's gun was in the area of the wallet. Shooting someone in the back is a coward way to handle the situation.

(07-19-2016 10:59 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(07-19-2016 10:53 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Has it been determined that it was diliberate?

You cannot be serious with this question right?

Why not? You'd be surprised at what happens as our food is handled, both freshly made and mass produced. That some roach leg(s) and rat feces slips into food is not uncommon. Also, I once opened some canned vegetables that came complete with glass.

It happens, even if the likelihood here is that it was intentional.

(07-20-2016 02:18 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(07-19-2016 10:28 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(07-19-2016 05:38 AM)HappyAppy Wrote:  The kind of person who shoots a bunch of cops, or puts glass in someone's sandwich, obviously has a screw loose. They didn't get that way because of some comments from Obama.

Nobody ever said it was just Obama making a few comments. The argument is that the tone set by the left, as a whole, has contributed to this.

"Hands up don't shoot" never happened but the left took it and ran with it before any facts were out.

Quote:If Obama said exactly what most of you wanted him to say (guessing that would be blindly praising all cops and calling BLM a terrorist group), these deranged individuals wouldn't magically become well functioning members of society.

You know the left went bat-shaq crazy over Palin using the word "targeted district" when Giffords got shot. Are you going to pretend that did not happen?

http://nypost.com/2011/01/09/calls-to-co...-shooting/

Quote:

Quote:Sen. Dick Durbin, the second-ranking Democratic leader in the Senate, today cited imagery of crosshairs on political opponents and Sarah Palin’s combative rallying cry, “Don’t retreat; reload.”

“These sorts of things, I think, invite the kind of toxic rhetoric that can lead unstable people to believe this is an acceptable response,” Durbin said Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

I think it's unfair to lay all of this at Obama's feet but he has had opportunities to diffuse tensions and never said, after a shooting, what needed to be said.

The stats show that during a police contact a white person is as likely to be shot as an African American. Let's get all the information on the events in *insert city* and be sure justice is swift, public, and true to the facts.

Quote:I also don't understand how in one breath many of you can blame the inflammatory rhetoric of Obama for these terrible acts, and in the next breath promote Trump as the next president. It's madness.

I'm not a trump supporter. His rhetoric is bafoonish on it's face. The problem with Obama is *1* the media parrots what he says (they will not do that with trump) and *2* he is a far more effective and believable communicator than Trump.

I am on the left, but I do have friends who are police officers. I blamed some people on the left for jumping on the gun before the facts came out. The is a difference between a bad cop like the one in South Carolina who shot an unarmed man from behind a different situation of the Minnesota case where Castile was shot while going for his wallet, but Castile's gun was in the area of the wallet. Shooting someone in the back is a coward way to handle the situation.

And here is the important part of what happened in SC

Quote:On June 8, a South Carolina grand jury indicted Slager on the murder charge after a few hours of deliberation. If convicted, he would face between 30 years and life in prison without the possibility of parole. The murder charge was the only charge presented to the grand jury. -- Wiki

(07-20-2016 03:36 AM)_C2_ Wrote:  

(07-19-2016 10:59 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(07-19-2016 10:53 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Has it been determined that it was diliberate?

You cannot be serious with this question right?

Why not? You'd be surprised at what happens as our food is handled, both freshly made and mass produced. That some roach leg(s) and rat feces slips into food is not uncommon. Also, I once opened some canned vegetables that came complete with glass.

It happens, even if the likelihood here is that it was intentional.

Exactly. This is political gain to be had here however so that possibility is out of the question. Even thought detectives have not determined whether or not it was an accident.

(07-20-2016 10:22 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-20-2016 03:36 AM)_C2_ Wrote:  

(07-19-2016 10:59 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(07-19-2016 10:53 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Has it been determined that it was diliberate?

You cannot be serious with this question right?

Why not? You'd be surprised at what happens as our food is handled, both freshly made and mass produced. That some roach leg(s) and rat feces slips into food is not uncommon. Also, I once opened some canned vegetables that came complete with glass.

It happens, even if the likelihood here is that it was intentional.

Exactly. This is political gain to be had here however so that possibility is out of the question. Even thought detectives have not determined whether or not it was an accident.

by the same token, we still dont know that it wasnt intentional. So the point is moot.

(07-20-2016 10:24 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(07-20-2016 10:22 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-20-2016 03:36 AM)_C2_ Wrote:  

(07-19-2016 10:59 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(07-19-2016 10:53 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Has it been determined that it was diliberate?

You cannot be serious with this question right?

Why not? You'd be surprised at what happens as our food is handled, both freshly made and mass produced. That some roach leg(s) and rat feces slips into food is not uncommon. Also, I once opened some canned vegetables that came complete with glass.

It happens, even if the likelihood here is that it was intentional.

Exactly. This is political gain to be had here however so that possibility is out of the question. Even thought detectives have not determined whether or not it was an accident.

by the same token, we still dont know that it wasnt intentional. So the point is moot.

"We still dont know" Tell that to the people who attacked my for asking if it was intentional.

(07-20-2016 10:22 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-20-2016 03:36 AM)_C2_ Wrote:  

(07-19-2016 10:59 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(07-19-2016 10:53 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Has it been determined that it was diliberate?

You cannot be serious with this question right?

Why not? You'd be surprised at what happens as our food is handled, both freshly made and mass produced. That some roach leg(s) and rat feces slips into food is not uncommon. Also, I once opened some canned vegetables that came complete with glass.

It happens, even if the likelihood here is that it was intentional.

Exactly. This is political gain to be had here however so that possibility is out of the question. Even thought detectives have not determined whether or not it was an accident.

There were shards of glass large enough to send the guy to the hospital. That's not "roach legs" or "rat feces". IT's also curious that only that officer's meal was impacted.

If it were something from a supplier one would think that more of the food being served could have an issue.

(07-20-2016 11:45 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(07-20-2016 10:22 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-20-2016 03:36 AM)_C2_ Wrote:  

(07-19-2016 10:59 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(07-19-2016 10:53 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Has it been determined that it was diliberate?

You cannot be serious with this question right?

Why not? You'd be surprised at what happens as our food is handled, both freshly made and mass produced. That some roach leg(s) and rat feces slips into food is not uncommon. Also, I once opened some canned vegetables that came complete with glass.

It happens, even if the likelihood here is that it was intentional.

Exactly. This is political gain to be had here however so that possibility is out of the question. Even thought detectives have not determined whether or not it was an accident.

There were shards of glass large enough to send the guy to the hospital. That's not "roach legs" or "rat feces". IT's also curious that only that officer's meal was impacted.

If it were something from a supplier one would think that more of the food being served could have an issue.

I once drank a can of beer and it has a shard of glass in it.

Sure it wasn't a Zima , Fit?

(07-20-2016 12:48 PM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  Sure it wasn't a Zima , Fit?

If it was a Zima, I wouldnt have thought twice about it becuase they are made of glass. What made this strange was that I was drinking out of a can.

(07-20-2016 12:48 PM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  Sure it wasn't a Zima , Fit?

Must have been brown glass because if it wasn't his one track mind would have called it racist.

(07-20-2016 03:59 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-20-2016 12:48 PM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  Sure it wasn't a Zima , Fit?

Must have been brown glass because if it wasn't his one track mind would have called it racist.

So much talk about my posts and racism and yet I almost never use the word.

(07-19-2016 10:53 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Has it been determined that it was diliberate?

No, it wasn't deliberate. Hillary was the cook and there wasn't intent.