(07-23-2016 12:49 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(07-22-2016 10:42 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(07-22-2016 10:04 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(07-22-2016 09:21 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  Reagan was a democrat... from California

A quarter century before he became the nominee in a time of some rather dramatic shifting of party allegiances.

he became a Republican at the age of 51, in 1962, and became the nominee in 1976

Since you missed on when he became the nominee, can I believe you on when he became a Republican?

Are you saying that what I posted is not true?


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

(07-23-2016 11:34 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  Trump is a fraud artist, and he have done business with mobsters in the past. You have a fraud artist on the republican side, and a lying piece of dogpoo on the Democratic side.

I told a coworker, "300 million Americans and we're reduced to this."

He replied, "Actually, there are probably only 60-70 people with the wherewithal to make a run."

I said, "Fine. Let me see the list."

General rueful mirth all around.

(07-23-2016 12:54 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(07-23-2016 12:49 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(07-22-2016 10:42 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(07-22-2016 10:04 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(07-22-2016 09:21 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  Reagan was a democrat... from California

A quarter century before he became the nominee in a time of some rather dramatic shifting of party allegiances.

he became a Republican at the age of 51, in 1962, and became the nominee in 1976

Since you missed on when he became the nominee, can I believe you on when he became a Republican?

Are you saying that what I posted is not true?


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

Reagan was the nominee in 1980. I know. I waited 2 hours in line to vote for him. And I worked for the Gerald Ford campaign in 1976.

(07-23-2016 12:47 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-23-2016 12:43 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-23-2016 12:39 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-23-2016 11:58 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-23-2016 11:35 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  That is a 12 thousand dollar jacket? How do we know this?

Because she is a liberal loon, and just like liberal loons, they overpay for pieces of crap.

1. Education System
2. Postal System
3. Obamacare
4. Technicolor cankle hiding trenchcoat

Oh so you were just talking out of your butt. Mmmmmkay

Once you learn how to spell, you will probably be able to do a google search. Here, let me help you.

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=hillary+12000+coat

That was cute. Too bad the first website on your little search debunks the whole argument.

Actually it doesn't. You asked how we know it's a 12,000 jacket... And even snopes admits it is. All we're arguing about now is where she wore it and whether she paid retail.

The point still stands that she's wearing to a campaign event, something that by itself would almost put someone over the federal poverty level. It's another in her long list of 'poor optics'.

(07-22-2016 11:50 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

I doubt Chairman Mao would approve of that party jacket.


Who in the hell pays that much for something like that? It looks like it was made from a set of 1970's pickup truck seat cover fabric.

(07-23-2016 12:47 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-23-2016 12:43 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-23-2016 12:39 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-23-2016 11:58 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-23-2016 11:35 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  That is a 12 thousand dollar jacket? How do we know this?

Because she is a liberal loon, and just like liberal loons, they overpay for pieces of crap.

1. Education System
2. Postal System
3. Obamacare
4. Technicolor cankle hiding trenchcoat

Oh so you were just talking out of your butt. Mmmmmkay

Once you learn how to spell, you will probably be able to do a google search. Here, let me help you.

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=hillary+12000+coat

That was cute. Too bad the first website on your little search debunks the whole argument.

Except that you are wrong again.

Snopes can easily fool any libturd who is used to getting spoonfed talking points and not thinking for themselves. Snopes admitted it was a $12K jacket.

(07-23-2016 02:20 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-22-2016 11:50 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

I doubt Chairman Mao would approve of that party jacket.


Who in the hell pays that much for something like that? It looks like it was made from a set of 1970's pickup truck seat cover fabric.

My get rich quick scheme is take a burlap potato bag, tie-dye it with a few different colors, cut two holes for arms and one hole for her giant ego, and sell it to her for $10K.

(07-23-2016 11:34 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  Trump is a fraud artist, and he have done business with mobsters in the past. You have a fraud artist on the republican side, and a lying piece of dogpoo on the Democratic side.

Don't reduce Hillary to just a liar. She's a criminal.

(07-23-2016 02:20 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-22-2016 11:50 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

I doubt Chairman Mao would approve of that party jacket.


Who in the hell pays that much for something like that? It looks like it was made from a set of 1970's pickup truck seat cover fabric.

It looks more like beer tabs. I think the white one looks way better. But look at who's wearing what. There's no comparison.

(07-23-2016 05:28 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(07-23-2016 02:20 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-22-2016 11:50 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

I doubt Chairman Mao would approve of that party jacket.


Who in the hell pays that much for something like that? It looks like it was made from a set of 1970's pickup truck seat cover fabric.

It looks more like beer tabs. I think the white one looks way better. But look at who's wearing what. There's no comparison.

With a body and legs like that, you dont pay $12,000 to cover it up.

And to think she just had a baby 3 months ago.