(07-15-2016 10:16 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 10:08 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 10:08 AM)miko33 Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 10:05 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 10:04 AM)miko33 Wrote:  What a callous, bullsh!t answer.

it's also the truth...take the old bridge, and you're good...might take an extra 15-20 mins.

Those 15-20 min can easily mean the difference between life and death. Patent disregard for life by the protesters.

kids fine...take the other bridge.

gay couples are fine, they can find another clerk to issue them a license. Oh wait, no, thats the definition of life and death.

yep. crickets

(07-15-2016 11:40 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 10:16 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 10:08 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 10:08 AM)miko33 Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 10:05 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  it's also the truth...take the old bridge, and you're good...might take an extra 15-20 mins.

Those 15-20 min can easily mean the difference between life and death. Patent disregard for life by the protesters.

kids fine...take the other bridge.

gay couples are fine, they can find another clerk to issue them a license. Oh wait, no, thats the definition of life and death.

yep. crickets

or abortions are fine... they can find another clinic to do them besides PP...

(07-15-2016 11:40 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 10:16 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 10:08 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 10:08 AM)miko33 Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 10:05 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  it's also the truth...take the old bridge, and you're good...might take an extra 15-20 mins.

Those 15-20 min can easily mean the difference between life and death. Patent disregard for life by the protesters.

kids fine...take the other bridge.

gay couples are fine, they can find another clerk to issue them a license. Oh wait, no, thats the definition of life and death.

yep. crickets

the SCOTUS deals with constitutional or unconstitutional...I'm sorry you don't like the system we have.

this thread should be moved to the WWE board...it serves no useful purpose.

(07-15-2016 11:27 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  yes, both sides of that bridge were shut down...however, the Memphis-Arkansas Bridge (aka 'the old bridge') was open both ways.

I will admit, I'm not in favor of shutting down a major road to get your way...but I look at 1965 and the Edmund Pettus Bridge...and I look at all the conversations being had in Memphis after this protest...and I at least understand why they did it.

Yeah but thousands still got stuck for hours.

(07-15-2016 11:43 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 11:40 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 10:16 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 10:08 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 10:08 AM)miko33 Wrote:  Those 15-20 min can easily mean the difference between life and death. Patent disregard for life by the protesters.

kids fine...take the other bridge.

gay couples are fine, they can find another clerk to issue them a license. Oh wait, no, thats the definition of life and death.

yep. crickets

the SCOTUS deals with constitutional or unconstitutional...I'm sorry you don't like the system we have.

this thread should be moved to the WWE board...it serves no useful purpose.

Liberal Checklist
muh gay license! - check
muh gay wedding cake - check
I want to pee squatting in the ladies restroom - check
A child gets blocked from receiving medical care in an emergency - f*ck the child

(07-15-2016 11:43 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 11:40 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 10:16 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 10:08 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 10:08 AM)miko33 Wrote:  Those 15-20 min can easily mean the difference between life and death. Patent disregard for life by the protesters.

kids fine...take the other bridge.

gay couples are fine, they can find another clerk to issue them a license. Oh wait, no, thats the definition of life and death.

yep. crickets

the SCOTUS deals with constitutional or unconstitutional...I'm sorry you don't like the system we have.

this thread should be moved to the WWE board...it serves no useful purpose.

Oh ****... we got a Junior Mod here! Everybody, give him some room....

(07-15-2016 11:46 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 11:43 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 11:40 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 10:16 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 10:08 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  kids fine...take the other bridge.

gay couples are fine, they can find another clerk to issue them a license. Oh wait, no, thats the definition of life and death.

yep. crickets

the SCOTUS deals with constitutional or unconstitutional...I'm sorry you don't like the system we have.

this thread should be moved to the WWE board...it serves no useful purpose.

Oh ****... we got a Junior Mod here! Everybody, give him some room....

(07-15-2016 11:46 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 11:43 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 11:40 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 10:16 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 10:08 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  kids fine...take the other bridge.

gay couples are fine, they can find another clerk to issue them a license. Oh wait, no, thats the definition of life and death.

yep. crickets

the SCOTUS deals with constitutional or unconstitutional...I'm sorry you don't like the system we have.

this thread should be moved to the WWE board...it serves no useful purpose.

Oh ****... we got a Junior Mod here! Everybody, give him some room....

He must be in Gen. DogPound's Tough Guy Brigade. They're total bada$$es.

(07-15-2016 11:46 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 11:43 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 11:40 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 10:16 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 10:08 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  kids fine...take the other bridge.

gay couples are fine, they can find another clerk to issue them a license. Oh wait, no, thats the definition of life and death.

yep. crickets

the SCOTUS deals with constitutional or unconstitutional...I'm sorry you don't like the system we have.

this thread should be moved to the WWE board...it serves no useful purpose.

Oh ****... we got a Junior Mod here! Everybody, give him some room....

oh yeah, I forgot, a conservative posted it, so it's immune from rules...man, I'm glad y'all are around to remind me of these things.

If Black Lives really mattered , then 53% of all Black babies wouldn't be aborted by their Black mothers. --Carry On!

(07-15-2016 11:59 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 11:46 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 11:43 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 11:40 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 10:16 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  gay couples are fine, they can find another clerk to issue them a license. Oh wait, no, thats the definition of life and death.

yep. crickets

the SCOTUS deals with constitutional or unconstitutional...I'm sorry you don't like the system we have.

this thread should be moved to the WWE board...it serves no useful purpose.

Oh ****... we got a Junior Mod here! Everybody, give him some room....

oh yeah, I forgot, a conservative posted it, so it's immune from rules...man, I'm glad y'all are around to remind me of these things.

yet you were the first one that derailed the thread and starting name calling... look yourself in the mirror "little boy"

it's interesting...I posted my thread:

http://csnbbs.com/thread-783984.html

over on a West Coast political board much like this one (it's a sports board, too) and so far we're 10 posts in and there are no insults, overt racism, or political grandstanding...just useful discussion of both sides issues...aka the right to protest, vs the dangers of shutting down roads interstates...it's quite refreshing.

(07-15-2016 12:08 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  it's interesting...I posted my thread:

http://csnbbs.com/thread-783984.html

over on a West Coast political board much like this one (it's a sports board, too) and so far we're 10 posts in and there are no insults, overt racism, or political grandstanding...just useful discussion of both sides issues...aka the right to protest, vs the dangers of shutting down roads interstates...it's quite refreshing.

did you try to lie in that one and say no child was hindered on the way to the hospital?

(07-15-2016 12:10 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 12:08 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  it's interesting...I posted my thread:

http://csnbbs.com/thread-783984.html

over on a West Coast political board much like this one (it's a sports board, too) and so far we're 10 posts in and there are no insults, overt racism, or political grandstanding...just useful discussion of both sides issues...aka the right to protest, vs the dangers of shutting down roads interstates...it's quite refreshing.

did you try to lie in that one and say no child was hindered on the way to the hospital?

^ no incendiary comments like that have been made, no...

(07-15-2016 12:00 PM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  If Black Lives really mattered , then 53% of all Black babies wouldn't be aborted by their Black mothers. --Carry On!

its also a reason that crime has been trending lower.

(07-15-2016 12:00 PM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  If Black Lives really mattered , then 53% of all Black babies wouldn't be aborted by their Black mothers. --Carry On!

So then what you are saying is that they dont matter?

(07-15-2016 12:13 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 12:10 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 12:08 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  it's interesting...I posted my thread:

http://csnbbs.com/thread-783984.html

over on a West Coast political board much like this one (it's a sports board, too) and so far we're 10 posts in and there are no insults, overt racism, or political grandstanding...just useful discussion of both sides issues...aka the right to protest, vs the dangers of shutting down roads interstates...it's quite refreshing.

did you try to lie in that one and say no child was hindered on the way to the hospital?

^ no incendiary comments like that have been made, no...

well then, if you didnt launch incendiary comments such as trying to promote it was a lie that a child was hindered from getting to the hospital, then that would likely yield a different discourse. So the two threads are not the same. In one, you tried to promote a lie. In the other, you didnt mention it.

So, if you prefer the discourse in the other thread, then in the future, don propagate a lie. Lesson learned.

But that's how BLM movement was founded ,.. On a lie!

(07-15-2016 12:26 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 12:13 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 12:10 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 12:08 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  it's interesting...I posted my thread:

http://csnbbs.com/thread-783984.html

over on a West Coast political board much like this one (it's a sports board, too) and so far we're 10 posts in and there are no insults, overt racism, or political grandstanding...just useful discussion of both sides issues...aka the right to protest, vs the dangers of shutting down roads interstates...it's quite refreshing.

did you try to lie in that one and say no child was hindered on the way to the hospital?

^ no incendiary comments like that have been made, no...

well then, if you didnt launch incendiary comments such as trying to promote it was a lie that a child was hindered from getting to the hospital, then that would likely yield a different discourse. So the two threads are not the same. In one, you tried to promote a lie. In the other, you didnt mention it.

So, if you prefer the discourse in the other thread, then in the future, don propagate a lie. Lesson learned.

^ nope, no such hostility and anger over there...

(07-15-2016 12:30 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 12:26 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 12:13 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 12:10 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 12:08 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  it's interesting...I posted my thread:

http://csnbbs.com/thread-783984.html

over on a West Coast political board much like this one (it's a sports board, too) and so far we're 10 posts in and there are no insults, overt racism, or political grandstanding...just useful discussion of both sides issues...aka the right to protest, vs the dangers of shutting down roads interstates...it's quite refreshing.

did you try to lie in that one and say no child was hindered on the way to the hospital?

^ no incendiary comments like that have been made, no...

well then, if you didnt launch incendiary comments such as trying to promote it was a lie that a child was hindered from getting to the hospital, then that would likely yield a different discourse. So the two threads are not the same. In one, you tried to promote a lie. In the other, you didnt mention it.

So, if you prefer the discourse in the other thread, then in the future, don propagate a lie. Lesson learned.

^ nope, no such hostility and anger over there...

so, why dont you behave the same over here as you do over there?