(07-13-2016 09:11 AM)DavidSt Wrote: JoePa is not here to defend himself. WE only heard from one side of the story. Even I don't remember much from 1976 and earlier. Remember, you are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. JoePa was not on trial, so there is no way he could be found guilty. It is just hearsay and at best fuzzy memories.
I'm pretty sure the victims' memories of their encounters with Sandusky and of their frustrations trying to bring the matter to light aren't "fuzzy." Some things, you never forget.
Oh, and it's not hearsay when the victims themselves testify about their experiences. That's called direct testimony. When multiple victims relate having their legitimate protests met with complete indifference, that's pretty damning.
Finally, what "even" you can remember of events prior to 1976 may be a function of your age. If you weren't born until 1980, then being unable to recall events in 1976 and earlier is understandable. If, on the other hand, you're anywhere near my age, either you should be able to remember things that happened to you in 1976, or you should be in a rest home anxiously waiting for a CNA to change your diaper.
A preponderance of evidence in the Philadelphia proceedings suggests that Paterno and his underlings were made well aware of Sandusky's proclivities and poor conduct over the years, and that, for whatever reason, they simply looked the other way.
It's a damned shame. A cousin of mine was CEO of one of Penn State's branch campuses and was personally acquainted with JoPa. Until her dying day, she believed that he was a man of honor.