The case against Clinton just got weaker. This afternoon State Department spokesman John Kirby said that the only two e-mails that had a classified marking on them prior to being sent were “call sheets” that were no longer considered classified:

http://www.wsbtv.com/news/the-latest-cli.../388679831

Quote:The State Department says human error was responsible for a pair of Hillary Clinton emails the FBI identified as marked classified when they were sent.

Describing a somewhat opaque internal process, spokesman John Kirby says officials often mark "call sheets" at the confidential level when the secretary of state is considering whom he or she will call. Once the secretary decides to make the call, the call sheets would be no longer classified.

Kirby says the markings on the Clinton emails mentioned by FBI Director James Comey "were no longer necessary or appropriate" as Clinton already had decided to make the calls.

One of the key elements to this story (that she knowingly sent marked classified materials) painting Clinton in a harsh light has been destroyed.

Well that changes everything.

Keep trying son.

Only 108 left to explain...

(07-06-2016 09:45 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Well that changes everything.

Keep trying son.

Actually it kind of does. If nothing was appropriately marked classified it's very difficult to prove intent beyond a reasonable doubt. And if it's really difficult to prove any reasonable prosecutor wouldn't bring it.

Angling for a job in the Clinton administration?

Nice try but no cigar. Oops

(07-06-2016 09:47 PM)Max Power Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 09:45 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Well that changes everything.

Keep trying son.

Actually it kind of does. If nothing was appropriately marked classified it's very difficult to prove intent beyond a reasonable doubt. And if it's really difficult to prove any reasonable prosecutor wouldn't bring it.

You need meds. Good on ya.

You know, really, the only persons character that takes a hit in this whole mess is the voter who acknowledges she lied multiple times and is corrupt yet still votes for her.
The college tuition give away is a huge Apple. It's bright red and sweet fruit.

That makes the decision to do what is Just all the tougher.

What a sticky wicked this is for the Clinton voter.

(07-06-2016 09:47 PM)Max Power Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 09:45 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Well that changes everything.

Keep trying son.

Actually it kind of does. If nothing was appropriately marked classified it's very difficult to prove intent beyond a reasonable doubt. And if it's really difficult to prove any reasonable prosecutor wouldn't bring it.

If these 2... 2 bud, 2 and 2 doesn't translate to "nothing"... can appropriately be dismissed, fine. So what. It's just 2. Adjust the tally. Woop-dee-do.


As for the intent, hard to imagine why you keep persisting in this lie.

And I guess you're just ignoring all the present and former prosecutors saying they would prosecute the case.

(07-06-2016 09:47 PM)Max Power Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 09:45 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Well that changes everything.

Keep trying son.

Actually it kind of does. If nothing was appropriately marked classified it's very difficult to prove intent beyond a reasonable doubt. And if it's really difficult to prove any reasonable prosecutor wouldn't bring it.

Doesn't change the fact she lied about the situation and then tried to cover it up

(07-06-2016 09:47 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Only 108 left to explain...

And 33,000 not accounted for and 700 to the Clinton Foundation for RICO Studies.

(07-06-2016 09:47 PM)Max Power Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 09:45 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Well that changes everything.

Keep trying son.

Actually it kind of does. If nothing was appropriately marked classified it's very difficult to prove intent beyond a reasonable doubt. And if it's really difficult to prove any reasonable prosecutor wouldn't bring it.

guilt, Mr. Non Lawyer or did you get a JD from Kaplan online?

(07-06-2016 10:22 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 09:47 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Only 108 left to explain...

And 33,000 not accounted for and 700 to the Clinton Foundation for RICO Studies.

And he has the audacity to claim 2 make some kind of earth shattering difference.

Super, from time to time we have to remind ourselves that we may be debating kids on the interwebs. This silly thread reminds me of that now. He used Elijah I'm a Freaking Idiot Rascist Cummings as a source for crying out loud. LULZ

(07-06-2016 10:28 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Super, from time to time we have to remind ourselves that we may be debating kids on the interwebs. This silly thread reminds me of that now. He used Elijah I'm a Freaking Idiot Rascist Cummings as a source for crying out loud. LULZ

Heck, I, and I imagine most others, wont ever bother trying to verify whether removing these 2 is the right call or not. I just immediately accepted it on face value. Just doesn't make a tiny drizzling piss difference.

(07-06-2016 09:47 PM)Max Power Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 09:45 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Well that changes everything.

Keep trying son.

Actually it kind of does. If nothing was appropriately marked classified it's very difficult to prove intent beyond a reasonable doubt. And if it's really difficult to prove any reasonable prosecutor wouldn't bring it.

So your defense of her corruption and lies is now utter incompetence? Keep preaching Brother Max Power, you are doing a fine job. Hillary is captain of the ship, aptly named the USS CORRUPT or the USS INCOMPETENT. Either way, you lose. The general public HATES her, and rightfully so.

Well ****... That changes everything!


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

(07-06-2016 09:47 PM)Max Power Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 09:45 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Well that changes everything.

Keep trying son.

Actually it kind of does. If nothing was appropriately marked classified it's very difficult to prove intent beyond a reasonable doubt. And if it's really difficult to prove any reasonable prosecutor wouldn't bring it.

Are you aware that most of the classified emails were CREATED by Hillary?

(07-06-2016 09:47 PM)Max Power Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 09:45 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Well that changes everything.
Keep trying son.

Actually it kind of does. If nothing was appropriately marked classified it's very difficult to prove intent beyond a reasonable doubt. And if it's really difficult to prove any reasonable prosecutor wouldn't bring it.

It's the content, not the marking, that determines the classification. And intent is not an element of the crime, beyond intent to put the information onto the server.

Oh Max, you are such a dem homer. Still feeling the Bern?