(07-06-2016 11:00 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:55 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:51 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:49 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:41 AM)solohawks Wrote:  If you believe no charges should have been brought against Hilary Clinton, than please answer this question honestly

If you or someone you know had done what she did at a lower ranking level than Secretary of State, would you be getting off with zero criminal or civil punishment?

What exactly did she do? Be specific.

Go listen to the first 15 minutes of the FIB director's announcement. He listed everything she did.

Go listen to the last 15 minutes of what he said. He said no charges should be filed.

I know this is extremely difficult for you to think for yourself but the OP is asking what YOU think.

WGAS? I care what the FBI/DOJ thinks...

A coworker of mine (civilian working for military in sensitive environment) just got canned last week for putting a USB drive into the wrong computer.

A bit of perspective.

(07-07-2016 06:14 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  A coworker of mine (civilian working for military in sensitive environment) just got canned last week for putting a USB drive into the wrong computer.

A bit of perspective.

Yep, lots of places security environments don't allow any external devices to be plugged into a laptop, etc. That immediately alerts IT and that's no bueno.

(07-07-2016 07:49 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(07-07-2016 06:14 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  A coworker of mine (civilian working for military in sensitive environment) just got canned last week for putting a USB drive into the wrong computer.

A bit of perspective.

Yep, lots of places security environments don't allow any external devices to be plugged into a laptop, etc. That immediately alerts IT and that's no bueno.

Not for Hilldawg.

She should've been charged.

"The Clinton Deal" is now a new weapon for attorneys to use when dealing with folks who have mishandled classified information.

Attorneys Intend to Ask for 'the Clinton Deal'

(07-06-2016 09:46 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 05:41 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Im not trolling. This person claims to know the nature of the information. Im simply asking for them to provide it.

There's a good reason many consider you a troll.

You go and cry in another thread about how people react to you. Your drive-by posting and acting stupid (at least I hope you are acting), and refusal to state your position clearly is why you are responded to in the way folks do. Simply denying everything and acting as if you don't know the facts is not helping your reputation. Neither is denying that FACTS uncovered by the FBI are indeed facts.

Just like your heroes, O and Hillary who are unaware of just about everything. (Paraphrasing) "I didn't know about it until I heard it on the news." - Obama (repeatedly)

It must be a blissful for you to go through life without facts and reason.

On the contrary, I know the facts and I know very well that no one on this forum knows the content within those emails. I coulds simply point that out but it helps the poster more if they admit that they dont have that information.

(07-07-2016 06:14 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  A coworker of mine (civilian working for military in sensitive environment) just got canned last week for putting a USB drive into the wrong computer.

A bit of perspective.

OPSEC!

(07-07-2016 02:23 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 09:46 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 05:41 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Im not trolling. This person claims to know the nature of the information. Im simply asking for them to provide it.

There's a good reason many consider you a troll.

You go and cry in another thread about how people react to you. Your drive-by posting and acting stupid (at least I hope you are acting), and refusal to state your position clearly is why you are responded to in the way folks do. Simply denying everything and acting as if you don't know the facts is not helping your reputation. Neither is denying that FACTS uncovered by the FBI are indeed facts.

Just like your heroes, O and Hillary who are unaware of just about everything. (Paraphrasing) "I didn't know about it until I heard it on the news." - Obama (repeatedly)

It must be a blissful for you to go through life without facts and reason.

On the contrary, I know the facts and I know very well that no one on this forum knows the content within those emails. I coulds simply point that out but it helps the poster more if they admit that they dont have that information.

Doesn't matter what anyone on this board knows the email contents. The FBI director already spoke to the fact that Clinton was "extremely careless" and some of the email reviewed couldn't be made public due to guess what, they were classified. Geez, this isn't rocket science. The ONLY reason she got off is because of who she is. Comey basically said that himself.

(07-07-2016 02:27 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(07-07-2016 02:23 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 09:46 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 05:41 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Im not trolling. This person claims to know the nature of the information. Im simply asking for them to provide it.

There's a good reason many consider you a troll.

You go and cry in another thread about how people react to you. Your drive-by posting and acting stupid (at least I hope you are acting), and refusal to state your position clearly is why you are responded to in the way folks do. Simply denying everything and acting as if you don't know the facts is not helping your reputation. Neither is denying that FACTS uncovered by the FBI are indeed facts.

Just like your heroes, O and Hillary who are unaware of just about everything. (Paraphrasing) "I didn't know about it until I heard it on the news." - Obama (repeatedly)

It must be a blissful for you to go through life without facts and reason.

On the contrary, I know the facts and I know very well that no one on this forum knows the content within those emails. I coulds simply point that out but it helps the poster more if they admit that they dont have that information.

Doesn't matter what anyone on this board knows the email contents. The FBI director already spoke to the fact that Clinton was "extremely careless" and some of the email reviewed couldn't be made public due to guess what, they were classified. Geez, this isn't rocket science. The ONLY reason she got off is because of who she is. Comey basically said that himself.

You also likely didnt watch the 4 hour testamony by Comey. He in fact said that she was not procecuted precisley for the exact opposite of what you just said. Because it would be unfair to her because she should be treated like everyone else rather than because of her political status.

Furthermore, his "extremely careless" comment is likely the only thing he said that was incorrect because it represented his own personal opinion in the investigation and not the part of this investigation.

(07-07-2016 01:30 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 11:00 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:55 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:51 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:49 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  What exactly did she do? Be specific.

Go listen to the first 15 minutes of the FIB director's announcement. He listed everything she did.

Go listen to the last 15 minutes of what he said. He said no charges should be filed.

I know this is extremely difficult for you to think for yourself but the OP is asking what YOU think.

WGAS? I care what the FBI/DOJ thinks...

This is the national arm we're talking about, not the Memphis chapter (or whatever city you're moving to). When we talk about Memphis/(insert new city here) we'll call you.

(07-07-2016 08:32 AM)VA49er Wrote:  "The Clinton Deal" is now a new weapon for attorneys to use when dealing with folks who have mishandled classified information.

Attorneys Intend to Ask for 'the Clinton Deal'

#precedence

(07-07-2016 02:43 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-07-2016 02:27 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(07-07-2016 02:23 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 09:46 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 05:41 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Im not trolling. This person claims to know the nature of the information. Im simply asking for them to provide it.

There's a good reason many consider you a troll.

You go and cry in another thread about how people react to you. Your drive-by posting and acting stupid (at least I hope you are acting), and refusal to state your position clearly is why you are responded to in the way folks do. Simply denying everything and acting as if you don't know the facts is not helping your reputation. Neither is denying that FACTS uncovered by the FBI are indeed facts.

Just like your heroes, O and Hillary who are unaware of just about everything. (Paraphrasing) "I didn't know about it until I heard it on the news." - Obama (repeatedly)

It must be a blissful for you to go through life without facts and reason.

On the contrary, I know the facts and I know very well that no one on this forum knows the content within those emails. I coulds simply point that out but it helps the poster more if they admit that they dont have that information.

Doesn't matter what anyone on this board knows the email contents. The FBI director already spoke to the fact that Clinton was "extremely careless" and some of the email reviewed couldn't be made public due to guess what, they were classified. Geez, this isn't rocket science. The ONLY reason she got off is because of who she is. Comey basically said that himself.

You also likely didnt watch the 4 hour testamony by Comey. He in fact said that she was not procecuted precisley for the exact opposite of what you just said. Because it would be unfair to her because she should be treated like everyone else rather than because of her political status.

Furthermore, his "extremely careless" comment is likely the only thing he said that was incorrect because it represented his own personal opinion in the investigation and not the part of this investigation.

Why do you persist on claiming you saw and read things that you in fact didn't see or read? Everything you posted is a flat out lie. He said none of the things you claim he said, and more importantly you're projecting your own biases and claiming the FBI Director backed up said biases.

(07-07-2016 08:58 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(07-07-2016 02:43 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-07-2016 02:27 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(07-07-2016 02:23 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 09:46 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  There's a good reason many consider you a troll.

You go and cry in another thread about how people react to you. Your drive-by posting and acting stupid (at least I hope you are acting), and refusal to state your position clearly is why you are responded to in the way folks do. Simply denying everything and acting as if you don't know the facts is not helping your reputation. Neither is denying that FACTS uncovered by the FBI are indeed facts.

Just like your heroes, O and Hillary who are unaware of just about everything. (Paraphrasing) "I didn't know about it until I heard it on the news." - Obama (repeatedly)

It must be a blissful for you to go through life without facts and reason.

On the contrary, I know the facts and I know very well that no one on this forum knows the content within those emails. I coulds simply point that out but it helps the poster more if they admit that they dont have that information.

Doesn't matter what anyone on this board knows the email contents. The FBI director already spoke to the fact that Clinton was "extremely careless" and some of the email reviewed couldn't be made public due to guess what, they were classified. Geez, this isn't rocket science. The ONLY reason she got off is because of who she is. Comey basically said that himself.

You also likely didnt watch the 4 hour testamony by Comey. He in fact said that she was not procecuted precisley for the exact opposite of what you just said. Because it would be unfair to her because she should be treated like everyone else rather than because of her political status.

Furthermore, his "extremely careless" comment is likely the only thing he said that was incorrect because it represented his own personal opinion in the investigation and not the part of this investigation.

Why do you persist on claiming you saw and read things that you in fact didn't see or read? Everything you posted is a flat out lie. He said none of the things you claim he said, and more importantly you're projecting your own biases and claiming the FBI Director backed up said biases.

Did you watch the proceedings?

(07-07-2016 11:51 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-07-2016 08:58 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(07-07-2016 02:43 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-07-2016 02:27 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(07-07-2016 02:23 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  On the contrary, I know the facts and I know very well that no one on this forum knows the content within those emails. I coulds simply point that out but it helps the poster more if they admit that they dont have that information.

Doesn't matter what anyone on this board knows the email contents. The FBI director already spoke to the fact that Clinton was "extremely careless" and some of the email reviewed couldn't be made public due to guess what, they were classified. Geez, this isn't rocket science. The ONLY reason she got off is because of who she is. Comey basically said that himself.

You also likely didnt watch the 4 hour testamony by Comey. He in fact said that she was not procecuted precisley for the exact opposite of what you just said. Because it would be unfair to her because she should be treated like everyone else rather than because of her political status.

Furthermore, his "extremely careless" comment is likely the only thing he said that was incorrect because it represented his own personal opinion in the investigation and not the part of this investigation.

Why do you persist on claiming you saw and read things that you in fact didn't see or read? Everything you posted is a flat out lie. He said none of the things you claim he said, and more importantly you're projecting your own biases and claiming the FBI Director backed up said biases.

Did you watch the proceedings?

No, and neither did you.

(07-08-2016 12:07 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(07-07-2016 11:51 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-07-2016 08:58 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(07-07-2016 02:43 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-07-2016 02:27 PM)VA49er Wrote:  Doesn't matter what anyone on this board knows the email contents. The FBI director already spoke to the fact that Clinton was "extremely careless" and some of the email reviewed couldn't be made public due to guess what, they were classified. Geez, this isn't rocket science. The ONLY reason she got off is because of who she is. Comey basically said that himself.

You also likely didnt watch the 4 hour testamony by Comey. He in fact said that she was not procecuted precisley for the exact opposite of what you just said. Because it would be unfair to her because she should be treated like everyone else rather than because of her political status.

Furthermore, his "extremely careless" comment is likely the only thing he said that was incorrect because it represented his own personal opinion in the investigation and not the part of this investigation.

Why do you persist on claiming you saw and read things that you in fact didn't see or read? Everything you posted is a flat out lie. He said none of the things you claim he said, and more importantly you're projecting your own biases and claiming the FBI Director backed up said biases.

Did you watch the proceedings?

No, and neither did you.

Dude Im on vacation, Ive been watching at least 4 hours of news everyday. I watched the whole thing.