(06-30-2016 05:33 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-30-2016 05:24 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(06-30-2016 05:17 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(06-30-2016 04:46 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-30-2016 04:41 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  me, when I enter a liberal circle jerk...

Why do you always have gay thoughts?

He's not gay.....but his boyfriend is.

hey, coming to the rescue of your (fit)butt buddy?

Why do you always call me fit butt?

Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

(06-30-2016 05:53 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(06-30-2016 05:24 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(06-30-2016 05:17 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(06-30-2016 04:46 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-30-2016 04:41 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  me, when I enter a liberal circle jerk...

Why do you always have gay thoughts?

He's not gay.....but his boyfriend is.

hey, coming to the rescue of your (fit)butt buddy?

You have to admit that it was funny, even if it did hurt your feelings.

Wait, you think that hurt my feelings? Oh that's cute! You are trying to give yourself some credit.


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

(06-30-2016 05:55 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(06-30-2016 05:23 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(06-30-2016 05:17 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-30-2016 05:08 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(06-30-2016 05:06 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  As I often have to explain to my students, Google is not a source. LMFAO

you never asked for a source, and I never said it was one...

So you dont have a source?

Quote:A slang term for an echo chamber.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circle_jerk

That is like saying "on the down low" means keeping quiet.

Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

or 57 states, right?

He probably just mis-spoke, or perhaps his point was that with an intelligent person like Scalia on the court to aggressively argue the case from a different perspective, that another could be swayed. I doubt it, but it's certainly possible.

(06-30-2016 04:41 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(06-30-2016 04:35 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  oops, looks like I walked in on a liberal circle jerk session.

me, when I enter a liberal circle jerk...

Pretty much every post tommy starts these days is a LCJ

(06-30-2016 06:06 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(06-30-2016 05:55 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(06-30-2016 05:23 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(06-30-2016 05:17 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-30-2016 05:08 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  you never asked for a source, and I never said it was one...

So you dont have a source?

Quote:A slang term for an echo chamber.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circle_jerk

That is like saying "on the down low" means keeping quiet.

Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

exactly my point

(06-30-2016 04:31 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Almost as funny as last night when he referred to our country as the "United Straights".

But not as funny as when Commander and Cheif Obama called our soldiers Corpse men..

(06-30-2016 06:17 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  or 57 states, right?

He probably just mis-spoke, or perhaps his point was that with an intelligent person like Scalia on the court to aggressively argue the case from a different perspective, that another could be swayed. I doubt it, but it's certainly possible.

I think he probably was half listening when he was briefed, and just assumed that it was another one of those ties we've been seeing. It is another example of sleep deprivation. I think if Trump would simply get a couple more hours of sleep, listen to his handlers, and stop shooting from the hip he would come across as much more competent.

(06-30-2016 06:31 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(06-30-2016 06:17 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  or 57 states, right?

He probably just mis-spoke, or perhaps his point was that with an intelligent person like Scalia on the court to aggressively argue the case from a different perspective, that another could be swayed. I doubt it, but it's certainly possible.

I think he probably was half listening when he was briefed, and just assumed that it was another one of those ties we've been seeing. It is another example of sleep deprivation. I think if Trump would simply get a couple more hours of sleep, listen to his handlers, and stop shooting from the hip he would come across as much more competent.

Campaigns are grueling for sure, and he's already a lose cannon. I tend to agree with this statement.

(06-30-2016 04:31 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Almost as funny as last night when he referred to our country as the "United Straights".

What's even funnier is that time our Vice President told a paralyzed man to "stand up". Good times.


Ooh, or how about that time our Vice President claimed the GOP was going to bring back slavery. "They're gonna put y'all back in chains!"


Oh the hilarity!!

Trump is a terrific mathematician.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

glad I clicked on this one.....sigh

just more ***** envy from the clitoris known as the dipshite libs....

never a valid argument....only smack and arid sponge defense....

addendum: gotta love pen!s getting stars when clitoris passes the 'border' challenge....

(07-01-2016 09:58 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  Trump is a terrific mathematician.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

He got excellent marks. He went to the best schools.

Though maybe he had said something about the number of states there are.

(07-02-2016 11:36 AM)Paul M Wrote:  Though maybe he had said something about the number of states there are.

I thought everybody knew there were 56?

Lol, fitbud derailed a LCJ thread. I guess he really 'is' unbiased in his trolling.

(07-02-2016 07:13 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(07-02-2016 11:36 AM)Paul M Wrote:  Though maybe he had said something about the number of states there are.

I thought everybody knew there were 56?

How about that time our Vice President told a paralyzed man to "stand up". Good times.


Ooh, or how about that time our Vice President claimed the GOP was going to bring back slavery. "They're gonna put y'all back in chains!"


Oh the hilarity!!

(06-30-2016 06:17 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  or 57 states, right?

He probably just mis-spoke, or perhaps his point was that with an intelligent person like Scalia on the court to aggressively argue the case from a different perspective, that another could be swayed. I doubt it, but it's certainly possible.

(06-30-2016 06:31 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(06-30-2016 06:17 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  or 57 states, right?

He probably just mis-spoke, or perhaps his point was that with an intelligent person like Scalia on the court to aggressively argue the case from a different perspective, that another could be swayed. I doubt it, but it's certainly possible.

I think he probably was half listening when he was briefed, and just assumed that it was another one of those ties we've been seeing. It is another example of sleep deprivation. I think if Trump would simply get a couple more hours of sleep, listen to his handlers, and stop shooting from the hip he would come across as much more competent.

Well first of all, Kennedy might have voted a different way if was a 4-4 tie to begin with. One of the reasons he sided with the majority was perhaps he didn't want that Texas law being sent back to the lower courts. So I'll give Trump the benefit of the doubt on this one.

Of course if Trump was president when Scalia died, the Republican-controlled Senate wouldn't have a hearing on his replacement either, riiigghttt???

And by the way, I'm ashamed to say I've seen Trump in action many, many times when he wasn't sleep-deprived (too many Apprentice and Celebrity Apprentice viewings), and he's always going to be shooting from the hip and saying things he shouldn't. He needs to follow Obama's lead and only read from the teleprompter.

(07-03-2016 08:05 AM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  

(06-30-2016 06:17 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  or 57 states, right?

He probably just mis-spoke, or perhaps his point was that with an intelligent person like Scalia on the court to aggressively argue the case from a different perspective, that another could be swayed. I doubt it, but it's certainly possible.

(06-30-2016 06:31 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(06-30-2016 06:17 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  or 57 states, right?

He probably just mis-spoke, or perhaps his point was that with an intelligent person like Scalia on the court to aggressively argue the case from a different perspective, that another could be swayed. I doubt it, but it's certainly possible.

I think he probably was half listening when he was briefed, and just assumed that it was another one of those ties we've been seeing. It is another example of sleep deprivation. I think if Trump would simply get a couple more hours of sleep, listen to his handlers, and stop shooting from the hip he would come across as much more competent.

Well first of all, Kennedy might have voted a different way if was a 4-4 tie to begin with. One of the reasons he sided with the majority was perhaps he didn't want that Texas law being sent back to the lower courts. So I'll give Trump the benefit of the doubt on this one.

Of course if Trump was president when Scalia died, the Republican-controlled Senate wouldn't have a hearing on his replacement either, riiigghttt???

And by the way, I'm ashamed to say I've seen Trump in action many, many times when he wasn't sleep-deprived (too many Apprentice and Celebrity Apprentice viewings), and he's always going to be shooting from the hip and saying things he shouldn't. He needs to follow Obama's lead and only read from the teleprompter.

He claims he only sleeps 4 hours a night. I think he is always sleep deprived.

(07-02-2016 09:48 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(07-02-2016 07:13 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(07-02-2016 11:36 AM)Paul M Wrote:  Though maybe he had said something about the number of states there are.

I thought everybody knew there were 56?

How about that time our Vice President told a paralyzed man to "stand up". Good times.


Ooh, or how about that time our Vice President claimed the GOP was going to bring back slavery. "They're gonna put y'all back in chains!"


Oh the hilarity!!

You might be surprised how many dumbasses believe crap like that. I was watching a youtube video with a liberal black man berating a black, trump supporter saying "Trump is gonna send you back to Africa." lmao