(06-03-2016 12:00 PM)JMUETC Wrote: (06-03-2016 11:47 AM)jmu-fan-1981 Wrote: Felt like this needed its own thread.
So the DNR article came out about scheduling and Bourne is careful to write that he was planning on talking about football scheduling for a few months now and wants to know that it was almost by coincidence that this article came out the day this latest edition of the Bourne Dialogue came out.
I read a lot of his explanation as AD-speak and trying to encourage fans that we don't have as many options because we're 1) too good of an FCS program and 2) we need to make money and play the 1 fbs school and 2 home games.
We can't play away games against good FCS teams because it hurts our chances... well, he didn't address the fact that we are playing a home and home against Norfolk State. How does that scheduling help us in the least?! I am still outraged about that more than anything else... even more than the conference affiliation snafu.
This idea that scheduling good games hurts JMU's chances of making the playoffs drives me crazy. Haven't we established that with the expanded field, a 7-4 and maybe a 6-5 team from the CAA will always make the playoffs? I know BDK did some quality research on this a while back.
So we can't take a chance on a nationally televised game at NDSU because we might lose? There are still 4 more losses to absorb and most likely get in. I guess the game is they want to be able to go .500 in conference and still make the playoffs. So 2 easy wins, an FBS loss, a .500 in the conference gets you in and because you haven't beaten anyone good, you exit in the first round.
Whoop de doo!
Well, I had said it was a lock that a 7-4, 7 Div I win CAA makes a watered down, 24 playoff field with an additional at large (14) with the MEAC dropping out. I was wrong. This past year's playoffs I thought the committee said the last 4 in were 9-2 Fordham (didn't win the Patriot AQ (7-4 Colgate did), 7-4 UNH, 6-5 WIU, 7-4 EIU? Anyway, I'm thinking UNH was about the 22nd team/12th at large in.
UNH (7-4/5-3)
-2-1 vs playoff teams (beat Colgate, RU, lost W&M).
-2 kind of bad losses. Were thumped badly by 5-5 SBU (SBU not 5-6 because were losing their game @ UCONN, was called at the half due to lightning). Lost 4-7 UD
TU (7-4/5-3) had to be one of the 1st 2 teams out along with 7-4 N Dakota.
-0-2 vs playoff teams (lost JMU & W&M, dnp RU & UNH)
-1 bad loss (Elon).
So I think its highly likely in an 11 game season that a 7-4 out of the CAA will get in this watered down 24 team, 14 at large bid field, but as TU proved, not a lock.