You still haven't provided any link to the actual poll.

Until you do, please STFU.

(06-01-2016 08:11 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  https://www.rebelmouse.com/gz_politcs/1832438442.html

You guys are busy little bees. Ok someone above said they could show me a counter example. I'll be waiting.

I can see 100 percent of Romney voters think the president deserves zero credit, but again, that's not the point of this thread. I'm not interested in that. Actually I don't have time for it to tell you the truth. I was just out to prove how ignorant the GOP is as a whole and I'll relish the fact that you can't find anything nearly comparable with the D's. We're not the anti science anti reality party.

Rebelmouse? WTF is this? Anyway... still haven't proved a damn thing about Romney voters.

(06-01-2016 07:00 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(06-01-2016 05:10 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  Obama has destroyed America! Look what has happened to gas prices!

Despite his stated goal and best efforts to drive them up. The best thing about Obama is that he's too incompetent to carry out most of what he wanted to do. Actually, I believe his real problem is that there is very little he can do without consensus and cooperation, and he's too much of a pompous, narcissistic, egomaniacal, flaming a-hole to get people to work with him. The worst thing is that he did manage to get one thing done.

The reason we have done as well as we have under Obama is because the American people are resourceful enough to overcome their government's best efforts to f-k them over. When Richard Nixon gave us 55mph speed limits, Americans learned to use CB radios. It's who we are.

Glad that you agree. Just think how resourceful you will become with HRC.

(06-01-2016 08:22 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(06-01-2016 08:11 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  https://www.rebelmouse.com/gz_politcs/1832438442.html
You guys are busy little bees. Ok someone above said they could show me a counter example. I'll be waiting.
I can see 100 percent of Romney voters think the president deserves zero credit, but again, that's not the point of this thread. I'm not interested in that. Actually I don't have time for it to tell you the truth. I was just out to prove how ignorant the GOP is as a whole and I'll relish the fact that you can't find anything nearly comparable with the D's. We're not the anti science anti reality party.

Democrats believe that Obamacare and the Iran agreement are going to work. That's pretty anti-reality.

Both side are so wedded to their ideological extremes that they ignore reality.

such is what the logic of the masses has become....

snl is begging (behind the scenes) that trump wins....lorne is this guy right now...

I wonder what % of Obama supporters think that the stock market is a relevant indicator of the health of the economy, state of the middle class, or poor people?

(06-01-2016 09:09 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  I wonder what % of Obama supporters think that the stock market is a relevant indicator of the health of the economy, state of the middle class, or poor people?

They Gots Their Obama Phones, Mexican Drug dealers got Their Automatic weapons, nothing else matters .

(05-31-2016 09:53 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  Funny how the left can't really identify anything Obama has done well, so now the big push is to paint the situation he inherited as worse and worse.

He inherited a recession that had just hit bottom. It's almost impossible to look bad in that case. He probably comes about as close to doing so as is possible. Weak recovery, pretty much nonexistent until republicans retook the house, and made possible by two factors--one that he had nothing to do with--quantitative easing--and one that he openly opposed--cheap energy.

Yes but it was the worse recession since the Great Depression and it doesnt' diminish the fact that most republicans actually believe that the economy hasn't improved.

It just goes to show how effective misinformation is from the right to it's supporters.

Team before country.

(06-01-2016 09:26 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-31-2016 09:53 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  Funny how the left can't really identify anything Obama has done well, so now the big push is to paint the situation he inherited as worse and worse.

He inherited a recession that had just hit bottom. It's almost impossible to look bad in that case. He probably comes about as close to doing so as is possible. Weak recovery, pretty much nonexistent until republicans retook the house, and made possible by two factors--one that he had nothing to do with--quantitative easing--and one that he openly opposed--cheap energy.

Yes but it was the worse recession since the Great Depression and it doesnt' diminish the fact that most republicans actually believe that the economy hasn't improved.

It just goes to show how effective misinformation is from the right to it's supporters.

Team before country.

Since Obama took office, the economy hasnt really improved. The economy was already improving prior to Obama taking office. Its been stagnant ever since.

Bush inherited a recession from Clinton, and the economy boomed until the democrats took over congress.

I think its improved, but certainly not at the rate it should coming out of a recession.

(06-01-2016 09:09 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  I wonder what % of Obama supporters think that the stock market is a relevant indicator of the health of the economy, state of the middle class, or poor people?

they only understand that up yields all becoming down...

oopsy, I gave dems too much credit understanding how their 401k (those that actually participate) is the real minnie driver of that bus....

(06-01-2016 09:45 AM)fsquid Wrote:  I think its improved, but certainly not at the rate it should coming out of a recession.

It only "improved" because of massive injections of federal dollars and printing money.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

(06-01-2016 09:49 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-01-2016 09:45 AM)fsquid Wrote:  I think its improved, but certainly not at the rate it should coming out of a recession.

It only "improved" because of massive injections of federal dollars and printing money.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

So then you admit that the government can improve the economy?

(06-01-2016 10:34 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-01-2016 09:49 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-01-2016 09:45 AM)fsquid Wrote:  I think its improved, but certainly not at the rate it should coming out of a recession.

It only "improved" because of massive injections of federal dollars and printing money.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

So then you admit that the government can improve the economy?

Sure but it depends on how "improve" is defined. You end up paying for it one way or another when federal money is involved.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

(06-01-2016 10:37 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-01-2016 10:34 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-01-2016 09:49 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-01-2016 09:45 AM)fsquid Wrote:  I think its improved, but certainly not at the rate it should coming out of a recession.

It only "improved" because of massive injections of federal dollars and printing money.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

So then you admit that the government can improve the economy?

Sure but it depends on how "improve" is defined. You end up paying for it one way or another when federal money is involved.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

Of course you do but we had no choice. Let's not forget that even if McCain had been elected, he proposed doing exactly the same thing and Bush before him.

(06-01-2016 10:41 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-01-2016 10:37 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-01-2016 10:34 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-01-2016 09:49 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-01-2016 09:45 AM)fsquid Wrote:  I think its improved, but certainly not at the rate it should coming out of a recession.

It only "improved" because of massive injections of federal dollars and printing money.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

So then you admit that the government can improve the economy?

Sure but it depends on how "improve" is defined. You end up paying for it one way or another when federal money is involved.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

Of course you do but we had no choice. Let's not forget that even if McCain had been elected, he proposed doing exactly the same thing and Bush before him.

So what? Both suck.

(06-01-2016 10:54 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-01-2016 10:41 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-01-2016 10:37 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-01-2016 10:34 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-01-2016 09:49 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  It only "improved" because of massive injections of federal dollars and printing money.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

So then you admit that the government can improve the economy?

Sure but it depends on how "improve" is defined. You end up paying for it one way or another when federal money is involved.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

Of course you do but we had no choice. Let's not forget that even if McCain had been elected, he proposed doing exactly the same thing and Bush before him.

So what? Both suck.

The point is that federal aid is a tried and true proven way to stimulate the economy despite all the of the hand wringing the Republicans do.

(06-01-2016 11:03 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-01-2016 10:54 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-01-2016 10:41 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-01-2016 10:37 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-01-2016 10:34 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  So then you admit that the government can improve the economy?

Sure but it depends on how "improve" is defined. You end up paying for it one way or another when federal money is involved.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

Of course you do but we had no choice. Let's not forget that even if McCain had been elected, he proposed doing exactly the same thing and Bush before him.

So what? Both suck.

The point is that federal aid is a tried and true proven way to stimulate the economy despite all the of the hand wringing the Republicans do.

Some injected Fed money is fine...as long as it does not create a bubble to burst later on. Id submit that tax cutting is more effective and the hero of Democrats everywhere...JFK..proved it.

I've been asked by moderation to do this again so here it is. It's a ppp poll.

https://www.rebelmouse.com/gz_politcs/1832438442.html

(06-01-2016 10:34 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-01-2016 09:49 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-01-2016 09:45 AM)fsquid Wrote:  I think its improved, but certainly not at the rate it should coming out of a recession.

It only "improved" because of massive injections of federal dollars and printing money.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

So then you admit that the government can improve the economy?

In the same way heroin can make you feel great so long as you keep upping the dose.

https://mobile.twitter.com/ppppolls/stat...1752654849