What would conferences media rights look like if Delaney hadn't considered them rolled?

Would there be a network for B1G, SEC, PAC, LHN, discussions for ACC & Big 12?

Would ESPN be in a better position without the conference networks?

I thought this would be about a weed bust...

Color me unimpressed.

Yeah, I was also thinking that based on the title of this thread, the OP probably meant to post his thread in a 420 forum and mistakenly put it here instead.

I thought someone had been:

My point is it seems that a significant portion of realignment, conference earnings contest, network expansion hinged on that singular moment of dice being considered rolled by Delaney.

Would there have been realignment if things continued under original model for media rights,etc.?

Would there even be a CFP as it seems a lot of extra interest to push it came about for conferences competing versus just teams after realignment.

1. ESPN would be WAY better off.

2. There would be far less realignment.

The other question is "how would the world look if PSU had stayed Indy?"

(05-29-2016 08:56 PM)Strut Wrote:  What would conferences media rights look like if Delaney hadn't considered them rolled?

Would there be a network for B1G, SEC, PAC, LHN, discussions for ACC & Big 12?

Would ESPN be in a better position without the conference networks?

It all started when ESPN sent out a low ball offer. What goes around comes around. ESPN is starting to get the 'comes around' portion of that phrase.

Like others say, they will soon be what CNN became.