(05-26-2016 02:59 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 02:52 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 01:35 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 01:18 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 01:14 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Well, he's definitely got my vote over Hillary or Bernie.

I hope that you stand by this statement even after the **** show that is he is going to put on over the next 6 months.

oh like you did after the last 6 months?

Still here.

but not standing by your statements... you were just a mere troll.

I would like to point out that I was the first to recognize firm's "support" of Trump as a complete and total troll job. I'll take your thanks off the air...

(05-26-2016 03:18 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 03:04 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 03:00 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 02:58 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 02:52 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Nope...still don't see any taking away the right to bear arms. Instead, just proposals for more reasonable regulations that most everyone supports in this country.

Making it such a hassle for legal gun owners that they decide to give them up is de facto taking away the right.
And many of the proposals that seem so reasonable to non gun owners will in fact have draconian impacts on gun ownership through raising the hassle factor.

Spare the emoticon. "We're not going to take away your gun rights, we're just going to increase the hassle factor until you give up," is in fact taking away gun rights. Anyone who claims otherwise is seriously devoid of honesty or integrity or both.

The emoticon is perfection. The NRA rhetoric you're espousing is pathetic.

Apparently Fox News has stoked his paranoia just like everyone else that watches it.

(05-26-2016 08:16 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 02:59 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 02:52 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 01:35 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 01:18 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  I hope that you stand by this statement even after the **** show that is he is going to put on over the next 6 months.

oh like you did after the last 6 months?

Still here.

but not standing by your statements... you were just a mere troll.

I would like to point out that I was the first to recognize firm's "support" of Trump as a complete and total troll job. I'll take your thanks off the air...

It was obvious to everybody (at least I assumed) from the get go. He is a liberal troll only tolerated because he was mildly funny with his act.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

(05-26-2016 04:13 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 03:48 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 03:46 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 03:37 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 03:20 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I noticed that you didn't cite any definitions of a well regulated militia. Obviously just an oversight.

Probably not an oversight. Clearly irrelevant.

Of course it's irrelevant. ~ NRA

No, it's irrelevant because the plain meaning of the English words say that it is irrelevant.

Right. Throughout history, this has never been debated and always accepted as not having anything at all to do with people having guns...for any reason they see fit..and all types of them as well! ~ NRA

The NRA has been quite successful at their indoctrination. They might as well be another church.

(05-26-2016 02:52 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Maybe I'm not familiar with the definition of "gutting"?

Nope...still don't see any taking away the right to bear arms. Instead, just proposals for more reasonable regulations that most everyone supports in this country.

I will agree that going after the gun makers for crimes with guns is a bridge too far. But I wouldn't worry, that's going nowhere. In addition, it is not changing any second amendment rights.

"Going nowhere"? How do you figure that? Two Supreme Court appointments and a few appeals later and all of a sudden that law is unconstitutional due to the individuals right to sue anyone or whatever they make up.

If Hillary is elected NOTHING regarding guns in this country is safe or will likely ever be the same.

(05-26-2016 09:19 PM)Claw Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 02:52 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Maybe I'm not familiar with the definition of "gutting"?

Nope...still don't see any taking away the right to bear arms. Instead, just proposals for more reasonable regulations that most everyone supports in this country.

I will agree that going after the gun makers for crimes with guns is a bridge too far. But I wouldn't worry, that's going nowhere. In addition, it is not changing any second amendment rights.

"Going nowhere"? How do you figure that? Two Supreme Court appointments and a few appeals later and all of a sudden that law is unconstitutional due to the individuals right to sue anyone or whatever they make up.

If Hillary is elected NOTHING regarding guns in this country is safe or will likely ever be the same.

You don't think Obama would have done the exact same thing if it had been possible?

(05-26-2016 09:22 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 09:19 PM)Claw Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 02:52 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Maybe I'm not familiar with the definition of "gutting"?

Nope...still don't see any taking away the right to bear arms. Instead, just proposals for more reasonable regulations that most everyone supports in this country.

I will agree that going after the gun makers for crimes with guns is a bridge too far. But I wouldn't worry, that's going nowhere. In addition, it is not changing any second amendment rights.

"Going nowhere"? How do you figure that? Two Supreme Court appointments and a few appeals later and all of a sudden that law is unconstitutional due to the individuals right to sue anyone or whatever they make up.

If Hillary is elected NOTHING regarding guns in this country is safe or will likely ever be the same.

You don't think Obama would have done the exact same thing if it had been possible?

Of course he would have, but he lost control of Congress and the SC justices didn't die fast enough for him to stack the bench. The next president could be nominating 3-4 justices over an 8 year presidency. That's why hillary is so dangerous to the second amendment

(05-26-2016 09:08 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 08:16 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 02:59 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 02:52 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 01:35 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  oh like you did after the last 6 months?

Still here.

but not standing by your statements... you were just a mere troll.

I would like to point out that I was the first to recognize firm's "support" of Trump as a complete and total troll job. I'll take your thanks off the air...

It was obvious to everybody (at least I assumed) from the get go. He is a liberal troll only tolerated because he was mildly funny with his act.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

Being only around for a month I'm surprised that you know so much about me. Believe me, that I am one of the angriest voices in the Spin Room which makes me one of the most conservative voices in the Spin Room. The most.

(05-27-2016 06:53 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 09:08 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 08:16 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 02:59 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 02:52 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  Still here.

but not standing by your statements... you were just a mere troll.

I would like to point out that I was the first to recognize firm's "support" of Trump as a complete and total troll job. I'll take your thanks off the air...

It was obvious to everybody (at least I assumed) from the get go. He is a liberal troll only tolerated because he was mildly funny with his act.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

Being only around for a month I'm surprised that you know so much about me. Believe me, that I am one of the angriest voices in the Spin Room which makes me one of the most conservative voices in the Spin Room. The most.

Decided to start over with a new handle.

(05-27-2016 07:24 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(05-27-2016 06:53 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 09:08 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 08:16 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 02:59 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  but not standing by your statements... you were just a mere troll.

I would like to point out that I was the first to recognize firm's "support" of Trump as a complete and total troll job. I'll take your thanks off the air...

It was obvious to everybody (at least I assumed) from the get go. He is a liberal troll only tolerated because he was mildly funny with his act.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

Being only around for a month I'm surprised that you know so much about me. Believe me, that I am one of the angriest voices in the Spin Room which makes me one of the most conservative voices in the Spin Room. The most.

Decided to start over with a new handle.

Didn't know that you were allowed to do that. Which E-gang member are you?