(05-01-2016 01:35 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  Im sorry buts its hard to get mad at you guys when we have all this money to go back to. I mean who cares if you get more draft picks it doesn't change that your conference is about to get alot worse. Ill trade draft picks for $7 million a year for my school any day.

You guys are like that poor homeless guy, who brags to a millionaire about finding free bags of peanuts.

Obviously you care or you wouldn't take the time to come over to the CUSA site and drop a few comments.

I see it more like the millionaire bragging to the homeless man that he makes more money than him.

Once you get those $7 million dollars a year then come and boast.

(05-01-2016 02:46 PM)stodgdog Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 01:35 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  Im sorry buts its hard to get mad at you guys when we have all this money to go back to. I mean who cares if you get more draft picks it doesn't change that your conference is about to get alot worse. Ill trade draft picks for $7 million a year for my school any day.

You guys are like that poor homeless guy, who brags to a millionaire about finding free bags of peanuts.

Maybe if you guys hadn't have bailed, CUSA, and UH, would be getting the same money you are enjoying in the AAC.

CUSA plays just as good of sports as the AAC, so you could have sat tight and enjoyed the same benefits you are now receiving. Why do you have animosity towards CUSA. If anything, it should be the other way round.

Just as good sports eh? How many bcs/ny6 bowls has c-usa won? How many national championships has c-usa won in either basketball or football? Are any of your teams in the playoff discussion for college football?

(05-01-2016 03:00 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 02:46 PM)stodgdog Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 01:35 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  Im sorry buts its hard to get mad at you guys when we have all this money to go back to. I mean who cares if you get more draft picks it doesn't change that your conference is about to get alot worse. Ill trade draft picks for $7 million a year for my school any day.

You guys are like that poor homeless guy, who brags to a millionaire about finding free bags of peanuts.

Maybe if you guys hadn't have bailed, CUSA, and UH, would be getting the same money you are enjoying in the AAC.

CUSA plays just as good of sports as the AAC, so you could have sat tight and enjoyed the same benefits you are now receiving. Why do you have animosity towards CUSA. If anything, it should be the other way round.

Just as good sports eh? How many bcs/ny6 bowls has c-usa won? How many national championships has c-usa won in either basketball or football? Are any of your teams in the playoff discussion for college football?

I don't know, but I have seen the teams play and there is no difference in quality.

(05-01-2016 03:10 PM)stodgdog Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 03:00 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 02:46 PM)stodgdog Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 01:35 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  Im sorry buts its hard to get mad at you guys when we have all this money to go back to. I mean who cares if you get more draft picks it doesn't change that your conference is about to get alot worse. Ill trade draft picks for $7 million a year for my school any day.

You guys are like that poor homeless guy, who brags to a millionaire about finding free bags of peanuts.

Maybe if you guys hadn't have bailed, CUSA, and UH, would be getting the same money you are enjoying in the AAC.

CUSA plays just as good of sports as the AAC, so you could have sat tight and enjoyed the same benefits you are now receiving. Why do you have animosity towards CUSA. If anything, it should be the other way round.

Just as good sports eh? How many bcs/ny6 bowls has c-usa won? How many national championships has c-usa won in either basketball or football? Are any of your teams in the playoff discussion for college football?

I don't know, but I have seen the teams play and there is no difference in quality.

You know you're right, if you just ignore any evidence that proves you wrong. Evidence such as NCAA bids, tourney credits, NY6 / BCS bowl appearance / victories, attendance, budget, viewership, academic prestige.

Ignoring every one of those things then ya, you might be right.

(05-01-2016 01:27 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 01:21 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  Let CUSA have their pseudo victory. They've gotta get them however they can, as rare as they are coming

We may need to concede this one guys. As a UCF fan, Kruciff is unquestionably an authority when it comes to "rare" victories.

Hey you can make fun of a winless season all you want. We honestly don't care. Especially when you consider that even with two winless seasons, UCF has a better overall record and postseason performance record than every program in C-USA. We sucked last year, you guys suck more often.

(05-01-2016 03:10 PM)stodgdog Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 03:00 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 02:46 PM)stodgdog Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 01:35 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  Im sorry buts its hard to get mad at you guys when we have all this money to go back to. I mean who cares if you get more draft picks it doesn't change that your conference is about to get alot worse. Ill trade draft picks for $7 million a year for my school any day.

You guys are like that poor homeless guy, who brags to a millionaire about finding free bags of peanuts.

Maybe if you guys hadn't have bailed, CUSA, and UH, would be getting the same money you are enjoying in the AAC.

CUSA plays just as good of sports as the AAC, so you could have sat tight and enjoyed the same benefits you are now receiving. Why do you have animosity towards CUSA. If anything, it should be the other way round.

Just as good sports eh? How many bcs/ny6 bowls has c-usa won? How many national championships has c-usa won in either basketball or football? Are any of your teams in the playoff discussion for college football?

I don't know, but I have seen the teams play and there is no difference in quality.

Not much difference in football, CUSA was rated higher and receive more revenue from the CFP than the AAC in (14-15). Two CUSA schools took AAC schools to the woodshed in bowl games this year. CUSA has just as much chance as any AAC to get NY6 bowl because we are all G5 schools.

CUSA football is just as good or better depending on what year you are talking about and the NFL draft proved that over the last few days. There is virtual no difference in talent playing in CUSA, AAC and MWC

Now basketball they have a legitimate argument, but not in football.

(05-01-2016 04:00 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 03:10 PM)stodgdog Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 03:00 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 02:46 PM)stodgdog Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 01:35 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  Im sorry buts its hard to get mad at you guys when we have all this money to go back to. I mean who cares if you get more draft picks it doesn't change that your conference is about to get alot worse. Ill trade draft picks for $7 million a year for my school any day.

You guys are like that poor homeless guy, who brags to a millionaire about finding free bags of peanuts.

Maybe if you guys hadn't have bailed, CUSA, and UH, would be getting the same money you are enjoying in the AAC.

CUSA plays just as good of sports as the AAC, so you could have sat tight and enjoyed the same benefits you are now receiving. Why do you have animosity towards CUSA. If anything, it should be the other way round.

Just as good sports eh? How many bcs/ny6 bowls has c-usa won? How many national championships has c-usa won in either basketball or football? Are any of your teams in the playoff discussion for college football?

I don't know, but I have seen the teams play and there is no difference in quality.

Not much difference in football, CUSA was rated higher and receive more revenue from the CFP than the AAC in (14-15). Two CUSA schools took AAC schools to the woodshed in bowl games this year. CUSA has just as much chance as any AAC to get NY6 bowl because we are all G5 schools.

CUSA football is just as good or better depending on what year you are talking about and the NFL draft proved that over the last few days. There is virtual no difference in talent playing in CUSA, AAC and MWC

Now basketball they have a legitimate argument, but not in football.

If it's the same then why is the CUSA tv contract headed for difficult times? Do the TV people have bad Intel? The MAC is in all likelihood going to be valued more than CUSA, so how is it all the same. CUSA had 6 picks in the draft last year by the way, AAC 11. One year at the same level congrats. Still does not change the fact that the TV people are struggling to find value in this league right now.

Also,if it's all the same why is the AAC ranked higher in football and basketball pols than CUSA. Do the sports writers and Playoff committee have bad Intel as well. Two very independent and importantbodies, TV people and Sports business folkes all rate CUSA behind the AAC,MWC and MAC. What are they missing that you aren't?

(05-01-2016 04:24 PM)baruna falls Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 04:00 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 03:10 PM)stodgdog Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 03:00 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 02:46 PM)stodgdog Wrote:  Maybe if you guys hadn't have bailed, CUSA, and UH, would be getting the same money you are enjoying in the AAC.

CUSA plays just as good of sports as the AAC, so you could have sat tight and enjoyed the same benefits you are now receiving. Why do you have animosity towards CUSA. If anything, it should be the other way round.

Just as good sports eh? How many bcs/ny6 bowls has c-usa won? How many national championships has c-usa won in either basketball or football? Are any of your teams in the playoff discussion for college football?

I don't know, but I have seen the teams play and there is no difference in quality.

Not much difference in football, CUSA was rated higher and receive more revenue from the CFP than the AAC in (14-15). Two CUSA schools took AAC schools to the woodshed in bowl games this year. CUSA has just as much chance as any AAC to get NY6 bowl because we are all G5 schools.

CUSA football is just as good or better depending on what year you are talking about and the NFL draft proved that over the last few days. There is virtual no difference in talent playing in CUSA, AAC and MWC

Now basketball they have a legitimate argument, but not in football.

If it's the same then why is the CUSA tv contract headed for difficult times? Do the TV people have bad Intel? The MAC is in all likelihood going to be valued more than CUSA, so how is it all the same. CUSA had 6 picks in the draft last year by the way, AAC 11. One year at the same level congrats. Still does not change the fact that the TV people are struggling to find value in this league right now.

Also,if it's all the same why is the AAC ranked higher in football and basketball pols than CUSA. Do the sports writers and Playoff committee have bad Intel as well. Two very independent and importantbodies, TV people and Sports business folkes all rate CUSA behind the AAC,MWC and MAC. What are they missing that you aren't?

+2 Amen!

You all seem awfully certain on your status. Why are you so upset and concerned that cusa fans feel the same? What are you trying to prove? Most of you AAC poster seem to hang your hats on your respective schools "status", seems like a miserable depressing life to care so much about the perception of your school.

(05-01-2016 05:14 PM)ODU2011 Wrote:  You all seem awfully certain on your status. Why are you so upset and concerned that cusa fans feel the same? What are you trying to prove? Most of you AAC poster seem to hang your hats on your respective schools "status", seems like a miserable depressing life to care so much about the perception of your school.

Nah

(05-01-2016 03:22 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  Especially when you consider that even with two winless seasons, UCF has a better overall record and postseason performance record than every program in C-USA.

Marshall, with the NCAA's best bowl and postseason winning percentage and multiple bowl wins against conference champions in bowl games, having finished ranked 21% of its years in FBS, would rightfully disagree with you.

(05-01-2016 04:24 PM)baruna falls Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 04:00 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 03:10 PM)stodgdog Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 03:00 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 02:46 PM)stodgdog Wrote:  Maybe if you guys hadn't have bailed, CUSA, and UH, would be getting the same money you are enjoying in the AAC.

CUSA plays just as good of sports as the AAC, so you could have sat tight and enjoyed the same benefits you are now receiving. Why do you have animosity towards CUSA. If anything, it should be the other way round.

Just as good sports eh? How many bcs/ny6 bowls has c-usa won? How many national championships has c-usa won in either basketball or football? Are any of your teams in the playoff discussion for college football?

I don't know, but I have seen the teams play and there is no difference in quality.

Not much difference in football, CUSA was rated higher and receive more revenue from the CFP than the AAC in (14-15). Two CUSA schools took AAC schools to the woodshed in bowl games this year. CUSA has just as much chance as any AAC to get NY6 bowl because we are all G5 schools.

CUSA football is just as good or better depending on what year you are talking about and the NFL draft proved that over the last few days. There is virtual no difference in talent playing in CUSA, AAC and MWC

Now basketball they have a legitimate argument, but not in football.

If it's the same then why is the CUSA tv contract headed for difficult times? Do the TV people have bad Intel? The MAC is in all likelihood going to be valued more than CUSA, so how is it all the same. CUSA had 6 picks in the draft last year by the way, AAC 11. One year at the same level congrats. Still does not change the fact that the TV people are struggling to find value in this league right now.

Also,if it's all the same why is the AAC ranked higher in football and basketball pols than CUSA. Do the sports writers and Playoff committee have bad Intel as well. Two very independent and importantbodies, TV people and Sports business folkes all rate CUSA behind the AAC,MWC and MAC. What are they missing that you aren't?

Kruciff said factual evidence and you're basing your opinion on article that is pure speculation of the value of the new CUSA TV contract

Here are the facts: CUSA was a better football conference based on the polls and the CFP in 14-15. The third and fourth place AAC teams got taken to the woodshed in bowls this year. Pretty sure CUSA beat AAC in matchups last year too.

AAC was better this year and had more draft picks last year.

Year in and year there is not much difference in the level of football played between CUSA, MWC and AAC. I know its hard to accept but it is the truth supported by factual evidence not on article based on pure speculation

(05-01-2016 05:45 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 04:24 PM)baruna falls Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 04:00 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 03:10 PM)stodgdog Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 03:00 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  Just as good sports eh? How many bcs/ny6 bowls has c-usa won? How many national championships has c-usa won in either basketball or football? Are any of your teams in the playoff discussion for college football?

I don't know, but I have seen the teams play and there is no difference in quality.

Not much difference in football, CUSA was rated higher and receive more revenue from the CFP than the AAC in (14-15). Two CUSA schools took AAC schools to the woodshed in bowl games this year. CUSA has just as much chance as any AAC to get NY6 bowl because we are all G5 schools.

CUSA football is just as good or better depending on what year you are talking about and the NFL draft proved that over the last few days. There is virtual no difference in talent playing in CUSA, AAC and MWC

Now basketball they have a legitimate argument, but not in football.

If it's the same then why is the CUSA tv contract headed for difficult times? Do the TV people have bad Intel? The MAC is in all likelihood going to be valued more than CUSA, so how is it all the same. CUSA had 6 picks in the draft last year by the way, AAC 11. One year at the same level congrats. Still does not change the fact that the TV people are struggling to find value in this league right now.

Also,if it's all the same why is the AAC ranked higher in football and basketball pols than CUSA. Do the sports writers and Playoff committee have bad Intel as well. Two very independent and importantbodies, TV people and Sports business folkes all rate CUSA behind the AAC,MWC and MAC. What are they missing that you aren't?

Kruciff said factual evidence and you're basing your opinion on article that is pure speculation of the value of the new CUSA TV contract

Here are the facts: CUSA was a better football conference based on the polls and the CFP in 14-15. The third and fourth place AAC teams got taken to the woodshed in bowls this year. Pretty sure CUSA beat AAC in matchups last year too.

AAC was better this year and had more draft picks last year.

Year in and year there is not much difference in the level of football played between CUSA, MWC and AAC. I know its hard to accept but it is the truth supported by factual evidence not on article based on pure speculation

If we're going by conference ranking per year, let's look at the past 3 years:

2013 C-USA: 2nd to last
2014 C-USA: 2nd
2015 C-USA: 2nd to Last

Right now you're averaging worse than 3rd all time. In that span the AAC is 1, 3, 1. Averaging better than 2nd.

1 year does not a trend make.

(04-30-2016 06:06 PM)BlueRaiderBoy Wrote:  Spin it anyway you want. CUSA is tied atop the Non-Cartel-5 for MOST DRAFT PICKS in the NFL in 2016! Time for this Conference to accentuate the Positive! Promote! Promote! and Promote!

Yep, even if the UAB player is not included AAC still didnt have more draft picks than CUSA

(05-01-2016 06:20 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 06:15 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 05:45 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 04:24 PM)baruna falls Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 04:00 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  Not much difference in football, CUSA was rated higher and receive more revenue from the CFP than the AAC in (14-15). Two CUSA schools took AAC schools to the woodshed in bowl games this year. CUSA has just as much chance as any AAC to get NY6 bowl because we are all G5 schools.

CUSA football is just as good or better depending on what year you are talking about and the NFL draft proved that over the last few days. There is virtual no difference in talent playing in CUSA, AAC and MWC

Now basketball they have a legitimate argument, but not in football.

If it's the same then why is the CUSA tv contract headed for difficult times? Do the TV people have bad Intel? The MAC is in all likelihood going to be valued more than CUSA, so how is it all the same. CUSA had 6 picks in the draft last year by the way, AAC 11. One year at the same level congrats. Still does not change the fact that the TV people are struggling to find value in this league right now.

Also,if it's all the same why is the AAC ranked higher in football and basketball pols than CUSA. Do the sports writers and Playoff committee have bad Intel as well. Two very independent and importantbodies, TV people and Sports business folkes all rate CUSA behind the AAC,MWC and MAC. What are they missing that you aren't?

Kruciff said factual evidence and you're basing your opinion on article that is pure speculation of the value of the new CUSA TV contract

Here are the facts: CUSA was a better football conference based on the polls and the CFP in 14-15. The third and fourth place AAC teams got taken to the woodshed in bowls this year. Pretty sure CUSA beat AAC in matchups last year too.

AAC was better this year and had more draft picks last year.

Year in and year there is not much difference in the level of football played between CUSA, MWC and AAC. I know its hard to accept but it is the truth supported by factual evidence not on article based on pure speculation

If we're going by conference ranking per year, let's look at the past 3 years:

2013 C-USA: 2nd to last
2014 C-USA: 2nd
2015 C-USA: 2nd to Last

Right now you're averaging worse than 3rd all time. In that span the AAC is 1, 3, 1. Averaging better than 2nd.

1 year does not a trend make.

Wrong CUSA ranked 1 last year in the polls. But Boise received the NY6 bowl and more revenue. Nice try though

Even if that were true, it wouldn't change the average the tiniest of bits.

(05-01-2016 05:45 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 04:24 PM)baruna falls Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 04:00 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 03:10 PM)stodgdog Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 03:00 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  Just as good sports eh? How many bcs/ny6 bowls has c-usa won? How many national championships has c-usa won in either basketball or football? Are any of your teams in the playoff discussion for college football?

I don't know, but I have seen the teams play and there is no difference in quality.

Not much difference in football, CUSA was rated higher and receive more revenue from the CFP than the AAC in (14-15). Two CUSA schools took AAC schools to the woodshed in bowl games this year. CUSA has just as much chance as any AAC to get NY6 bowl because we are all G5 schools.

CUSA football is just as good or better depending on what year you are talking about and the NFL draft proved that over the last few days. There is virtual no difference in talent playing in CUSA, AAC and MWC

Now basketball they have a legitimate argument, but not in football.

If it's the same then why is the CUSA tv contract headed for difficult times? Do the TV people have bad Intel? The MAC is in all likelihood going to be valued more than CUSA, so how is it all the same. CUSA had 6 picks in the draft last year by the way, AAC 11. One year at the same level congrats. Still does not change the fact that the TV people are struggling to find value in this league right now.

Also,if it's all the same why is the AAC ranked higher in football and basketball pols than CUSA. Do the sports writers and Playoff committee have bad Intel as well. Two very independent and importantbodies, TV people and Sports business folkes all rate CUSA behind the AAC,MWC and MAC. What are they missing that you aren't?

Kruciff said factual evidence and you're basing your opinion on article that is pure speculation of the value of the new CUSA TV contract

Here are the facts: CUSA was a better football conference based on the polls and the CFP in 14-15. The third and fourth place AAC teams got taken to the woodshed in bowls this year. Pretty sure CUSA beat AAC in matchups last year too.

AAC was better this year and had more draft picks last year.

Year in and year there is not much difference in the level of football played between CUSA, MWC and AAC. I know its hard to accept but it is the truth supported by factual evidence not on article based on pure speculation

It was the ODU AD that stated they were looking to take a large hit fr9m the new TV contract. Guess he is speculating as well.

(05-01-2016 05:45 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 04:24 PM)baruna falls Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 04:00 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 03:10 PM)stodgdog Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 03:00 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  Just as good sports eh? How many bcs/ny6 bowls has c-usa won? How many national championships has c-usa won in either basketball or football? Are any of your teams in the playoff discussion for college football?

I don't know, but I have seen the teams play and there is no difference in quality.

Not much difference in football, CUSA was rated higher and receive more revenue from the CFP than the AAC in (14-15). Two CUSA schools took AAC schools to the woodshed in bowl games this year. CUSA has just as much chance as any AAC to get NY6 bowl because we are all G5 schools.

CUSA football is just as good or better depending on what year you are talking about and the NFL draft proved that over the last few days. There is virtual no difference in talent playing in CUSA, AAC and MWC

Now basketball they have a legitimate argument, but not in football.

If it's the same then why is the CUSA tv contract headed for difficult times? Do the TV people have bad Intel? The MAC is in all likelihood going to be valued more than CUSA, so how is it all the same. CUSA had 6 picks in the draft last year by the way, AAC 11. One year at the same level congrats. Still does not change the fact that the TV people are struggling to find value in this league right now.

Also,if it's all the same why is the AAC ranked higher in football and basketball pols than CUSA. Do the sports writers and Playoff committee have bad Intel as well. Two very independent and importantbodies, TV people and Sports business folkes all rate CUSA behind the AAC,MWC and MAC. What are they missing that you aren't?

Kruciff said factual evidence and you're basing your opinion on article that is pure speculation of the value of the new CUSA TV contract

Here are the facts: CUSA was a better football conference based on the polls and the CFP in 14-15. The third and fourth place AAC teams got taken to the woodshed in bowls this year. Pretty sure CUSA beat AAC in matchups last year too.

AAC was better this year and had more draft picks last year.

Year in and year there is not much difference in the level of football played between CUSA, MWC and AAC. I know its hard to accept but it is the truth supported by factual evidence not on article based on pure speculation

I like how you keep leaving out the year UCF won the fiesta bowl for the aac. You also leave put that the aac set the record for a G5 conference with 4 teams ranked in the top 25 at once. Typical c- usa fans skewing the facts because their in denial about how mediocre their conference is.

(05-01-2016 09:26 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 05:45 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 04:24 PM)baruna falls Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 04:00 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 03:10 PM)stodgdog Wrote:  I don't know, but I have seen the teams play and there is no difference in quality.

Not much difference in football, CUSA was rated higher and receive more revenue from the CFP than the AAC in (14-15). Two CUSA schools took AAC schools to the woodshed in bowl games this year. CUSA has just as much chance as any AAC to get NY6 bowl because we are all G5 schools.

CUSA football is just as good or better depending on what year you are talking about and the NFL draft proved that over the last few days. There is virtual no difference in talent playing in CUSA, AAC and MWC

Now basketball they have a legitimate argument, but not in football.

If it's the same then why is the CUSA tv contract headed for difficult times? Do the TV people have bad Intel? The MAC is in all likelihood going to be valued more than CUSA, so how is it all the same. CUSA had 6 picks in the draft last year by the way, AAC 11. One year at the same level congrats. Still does not change the fact that the TV people are struggling to find value in this league right now.

Also,if it's all the same why is the AAC ranked higher in football and basketball pols than CUSA. Do the sports writers and Playoff committee have bad Intel as well. Two very independent and importantbodies, TV people and Sports business folkes all rate CUSA behind the AAC,MWC and MAC. What are they missing that you aren't?

Kruciff said factual evidence and you're basing your opinion on article that is pure speculation of the value of the new CUSA TV contract

Here are the facts: CUSA was a better football conference based on the polls and the CFP in 14-15. The third and fourth place AAC teams got taken to the woodshed in bowls this year. Pretty sure CUSA beat AAC in matchups last year too.

AAC was better this year and had more draft picks last year.

Year in and year there is not much difference in the level of football played between CUSA, MWC and AAC. I know its hard to accept but it is the truth supported by factual evidence not on article based on pure speculation

I like how you keep leaving out the year UCF won the fiesta bowl for the aac. You also leave put that the aac set the record for a G5 conference with 4 teams ranked in the top 25 at once. Typical c- usa fans skewing the facts because their in denial about how mediocre their conference is.

Yawn. This is getting old. Tech was in conference that won multiple BCS bowls and had 3 teams ranked in the top 25 on multiple occasions including the latest 2012 when Tech, Utah State and San Jose State were all ranked. Big freaking deal.

CUSA was so medicore that it took two AAC bowl teams to the woodshed this past bowl season. What was the AAC bowl record 2-6? I like how you keep leaving that out. AAC folded to the mediocre run of the mill G5 conference that it truly is.

BTW What happen to them little cougars in Houston the last time Tech visited? Now run along tail tucked, back to the AAC board

Lol Dawgxas, right now

(05-02-2016 07:32 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  Lol Dawgxas, right now

Says the AAC fans that are on the CUSA board bragging about AAC football. You're G5 conference with the same amount of talent.

No need to come on to CUSA board to get affirmation of AAC football. We already know how mediocre it is and that CUSA dominated AAC in bowl games