CUSA voted for the camps as they should have. WKU can not even hold our 2 in state camps along with one in Tenn as we usually do.

The Sun Belt and the PAC 12 both voted against the camps even though most of the athletic directors of those 2 conferences voted for the camps.

There is some strange back seat deals taking place.

I love how some NCAA changes take years of debate but a few SEC coaches complain and the rule gets changed in two minutes and it looks like there was some big time Chicanery in the voting.

Its a total sham. If anything In-state camps should be exempt. Many players simply cannot travel to Ruston or Bowling Green for camps.

As pointed out it in the other thread I also love how the so called "power" Confs get a vote that counts as 2 votes while the rest of us get a vote that counts as one. So even if every conf voted no but the 4 power Confs that voted yes they still would of won. 4 out of 10 and they would of won.

"All animals are created equal, but some are more equal than others......"

George Orwell, Animal Farm

(04-24-2016 10:08 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  "All animals are created equal, but some are more equal than others......"

George Orwell, Animal Farm

Four Legs Good...Two Legs Bad

Or in this case...Power conferences good...non power conferences bad