Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Rice leads the nation in high APR programs
Author Message
Hambone10 Offline
Hooter
*

Posts: 40,333
Joined: Nov 2005
Reputation: 1290
I Root For: My Kids
Location: Right Down th Middle

New Orleans BowlDonatorsThe Parliament Awards
Post: #41
RE: Rice leads the nation in high APR programs
(04-13-2016 03:21 PM)loki_the_bubba Wrote:  My daughter is claiming victory over me because ND has more total teams recognized.

Given that most of these other sports offer no path to the pros, thus no big payday, the value of the educational opportunity is massive... And since we already offer lots of scholarships and MANY of these sports are relatively low cost (not all to be certain, but many)... I wish we would sponsor a TON more sports.

Cheerleading, Academic decathlon, fencing, badminton, rifelry, chess, bowling... More options in track, swimming, diving, women's golf... Academic decathlon.

We're already giving people scholarships, so rather than call it a 50% academic scholarship, give them a 50% athletic scholarship for bowling... Provided they meet the academic requirements they would have met anyway. It's not like we would want or need to lower our academic standards to be competitive in bowling.

I wouldn't do women's softball or men's soccer... Despite the popularity. Relatively high cost and difficult to field competitive teams because 'the big boys' are all there. I'd go for the smaller, lower hanging fruit.


(04-13-2016 03:37 PM)cr11owl Wrote:  
(04-13-2016 03:34 PM)Bailiff_Lingo_Bingo Wrote:  
(04-13-2016 03:20 PM)Pimpa Wrote:  I think what is most jarring is just how far apart we are from the rest of CUSA.

How far apart we are from all other programs in the nation*

Exactly. It's not like any schools in Texas other than UT are closer than CUSA schools.

THIS is what I've been pointing out for a long time. If you want a top 25 education and you actually want to graduate (meaning your efforts mean something), nobody else even comes remotely close in G5... And lots in p5 don't either. Sure, you can get a great education at Texas AND play sports, but they don't really care if you graduate or not. If you're not starting, they probably don't even care if you stay eligible... In fact, they'd probably prefer you didn't so they could offer someone else your scholarship.

I know we want the coaches to know the players etc... But if you have someone who is a 4* (in whatever sport) and a great student, he probably wants Texas... But what happens if he isn't the starter there?
07-23-2016 11:43 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Antarius Offline
Say no to cronyism
*

Posts: 11,959
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 87
I Root For: Rice
Location: KHOU
Post: #42
RE: Rice leads the nation in high APR programs
Hambone- what you suggest isn't that much different from D3. Smaller sports, scholarships if any are academic.

What benefit does D1 with a bunch of obscure and low exposure sports give us? Other than higher expenditures?
07-23-2016 11:49 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hambone10 Offline
Hooter
*

Posts: 40,333
Joined: Nov 2005
Reputation: 1290
I Root For: My Kids
Location: Right Down th Middle

New Orleans BowlDonatorsThe Parliament Awards
Post: #43
RE: Rice leads the nation in high APR programs
(07-23-2016 11:49 AM)Antarius Wrote:  Hambone- what you suggest isn't that much different from D3. Smaller sports, scholarships if any are academic.

What benefit does D1 with a bunch of obscure and low exposure sports give us? Other than higher expenditures?

In some ways, it is d3... But it's d3 for everyone. What it does is reduce the concentration of football athletes among the total, and it gives us SOME exposure, albeit to a limited audience... We would own that audience... If we added 3 sports and I'd assume we'd field high academic and high performance athletes in those sports and thus potentially Olympic mention at the trials at least every few years, and also when reports like this come out, we wouldn't only be 71%, but more like 81% or even 91%, and 14 "top performers' rather than 10 without having to improve the academic performance of the big3. More important in my mind is that it makes a higher percentage of our students 'College Athletes' which ultimately is good for attendance and the big 3. This is part of what Stanford did. Notice how many more sports they sponsor than say Northwestern or Vandy


The 'additional expenses' are really part of student life... And of course the scholarships are academic scholarships (we could have an unofficial 4.0 2300 SAT minimum for Bowling)

Not to mention that kids who are into fencing or bowling are into fencing and bowling. It wouldn't take much to 'market' to this group and the sport expenses you could probably get sporting goods companies to sponsor some of it, since they don't get much advertising for their foils

Also as others have mentioned it gives us the potential to be in conference with 'the big boys' in something, which means we are talking more, which gives us opportunities to make our case, and prove it, albeit on a small stage.
(This post was last modified: 07-23-2016 01:28 PM by Hambone10.)
07-23-2016 01:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
exowlswimmer Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 380
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 9
I Root For: Rice
Location:
Post: #44
RE: Rice leads the nation in high APR programs
(07-23-2016 01:22 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  
(07-23-2016 11:49 AM)Antarius Wrote:  Hambone- what you suggest isn't that much different from D3. Smaller sports, scholarships if any are academic.

What benefit does D1 with a bunch of obscure and low exposure sports give us? Other than higher expenditures?

In some ways, it is d3... But it's d3 for everyone. What it does is reduce the concentration of football athletes among the total, and it gives us SOME exposure, albeit to a limited audience... We would own that audience... If we added 3 sports and I'd assume we'd field high academic and high performance athletes in those sports and thus potentially Olympic mention at the trials at least every few years, and also when reports like this come out, we wouldn't only be 71%, but more like 81% or even 91%, and 14 "top performers' rather than 10 without having to improve the academic performance of the big3. More important in my mind is that it makes a higher percentage of our students 'College Athletes' which ultimately is good for attendance and the big 3. This is part of what Stanford did. Notice how many more sports they sponsor than say Northwestern or Vandy


The 'additional expenses' are really part of student life... And of course the scholarships are academic scholarships (we could have an unofficial 4.0 2300 SAT minimum for Bowling)

Not to mention that kids who are into fencing or bowling are into fencing and bowling. It wouldn't take much to 'market' to this group and the sport expenses you could probably get sporting goods companies to sponsor some of it, since they don't get much advertising for their foils

Also as others have mentioned it gives us the potential to be in conference with 'the big boys' in something, which means we are talking more, which gives us opportunities to make our case, and prove it, albeit on a small stage.
Antarius,
As someone who competed in one of those low exposure sports, I lament that this option is no longer available to one of my gender at Rice. Our budget back then was minimal, no schollies for the guys and every expense possible, coaches, rented pool time, transport to meets was allocated to our women's half of "the team." We were just happy to be in the pool together and compete, providing additional training partners in practice, challenging them and admiring their "All American" level prowess at a sport that by our gender's norms we were average to below average by DI standards at best. Yet we excelled in the classroom and had a positive outlet for the excess energy most 18-22 year olds have. And we had the honor of representing the blue and grey. That is what Hambone is getting at!

Going forward, Rice has to get back to the big kids table or we will never see these sports that you only hear about every four years, at least for the government designated "overrepresented" sex.

Rice would be an asset, APR, geographically, even athletically to any conference it joins. For reasons stated next I advocate some affiliation with the SEC!

b12 expansion is potentially poaching on SEC territory with talk of Memphis, Tulane and Cincy (really northern Kentucky, or at least the airport is). Rice offers a way for the SEC to shore up Texas (the state.) Another AAU school for the SEC.

SEC shores up Texas with teams having games in Houston. Playing against Rice is a better recruiting tool for the other SEC teams than facing 100K rabid aggies in CS. For Rice, we are instantly in a conference with two former SWC rivals, the hated ags and Arky. LSU is a traditional rival from waaaay back. If we don't move soon that history will be forgotten. If the SEC isn't ready to take the plunge with us, sweeten the deal, 10 years, limited conference money or an all sports except football deal with a scheduling alliance giving us a limited 4 SEC games each year to supplement our now football indy status.

Consider this, Vandy and Rice move one home game a year to the Superdome against a distant conference rival, say South Carolina v. Vandy and/or Florida v. Rice as a destination early or late season reward trip, preferably at the same time as a Tulame home game v. Iowa State or Baylor. Provide options for the big boys (hope JK is already working something like this behind the scenes.)
(This post was last modified: 07-30-2016 04:49 AM by exowlswimmer.)
07-29-2016 09:01 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.