(04-07-2016 10:14 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 10:13 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 10:09 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 09:54 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 08:09 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Why? because she is prosecuting people who broke the law?

It is very telling of republicans/conservatives on this thread that they support disregarding the law because the victims are a political group they disagree with.

What ***** law did he break? Please, I'd like to know.

laws with an S.

In california you can't secretly record private conversations. he engaged in fraud to obtain company secrets. his cover included forging documents as well as state issued identification.

then on the civil side of things there is defamation of character and violating non-disclosure agreements.

A conversation that takes place in public is not private

LOL. private conversation is private conversation.

Wait...

So why isn't the woman who recorded Donald Sterling in jail? I bet she's a liberal democrat.

(04-07-2016 11:30 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 11:12 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 11:03 PM)john01992 Wrote:  you are the google expert. figure it out.

That's what I thought

if you want to say that every major media organization did not take a look at this. by all means be that naive fool...

so we should believe whatever the media says?



and you call me the naive fool...

Media took a look and showed enough of the tapes that any AG could easily bring charges, at a minimum the same charges, intent to buy and sell, that they have brought against one party involved.

Like I said, absurd that they charge the one with no actual intent to buy and cover for the monsters willing to sell so they could buy new cars.

(04-08-2016 07:59 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 10:14 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 10:13 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 10:09 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 09:54 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  What ***** law did he break? Please, I'd like to know.

laws with an S.

In california you can't secretly record private conversations. he engaged in fraud to obtain company secrets. his cover included forging documents as well as state issued identification.

then on the civil side of things there is defamation of character and violating non-disclosure agreements.

A conversation that takes place in public is not private

LOL. private conversation is private conversation.

Wait...

So why isn't the woman who recorded Donald Sterling in jail? I bet she's a liberal democrat.

Because to john, team over laws