Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)
Open TigerLinks
 

Post Reply 
let me get this straight..
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
450bench Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 30,771
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation: 2301
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Memphis
Post: #21
RE: let me get this straight..
(04-03-2016 10:32 PM)hsvtiger Wrote:  
(04-03-2016 10:36 AM)bubbapt Wrote:  
(04-03-2016 10:19 AM)Brother Bluto Wrote:  
(04-02-2016 09:19 PM)juggoman Wrote:  
(04-02-2016 09:15 PM)fsquid Wrote:  We negotiated poorly

From the same person that reviewed a certain contract. That she was appointed a Federal Judge by the current administration says it all!

I thought that contract was Bowen's fault ?

Folks are starting to add two and two.

But, are they getting 4?

hmmm....
(This post was last modified: 04-04-2016 12:27 AM by 450bench.)
04-04-2016 12:25 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UofMemphis Away
Official MT.org Ambassador of Smack
*

Posts: 48,797
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 1129
I Root For: Univ of Memphis
Location: Memphis (Berclair)

Donators
Post: #22
RE: let me get this straight..
(04-02-2016 09:19 PM)juggoman Wrote:  
(04-02-2016 09:15 PM)fsquid Wrote:  We negotiated poorly

From the same person that reviewed a certain contract. That she was appointed a Federal Judge by the current administration says it all!

what rulings of hers do you disagree with, and why? How long have you been a lawyer?
04-04-2016 07:42 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
fsquid Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 81,357
Joined: Jan 2004
Reputation: 1835
I Root For: Memphis, Queens (NC)
Location: St Johns, FL

CrappiesCrappiesCrappiesCrappiesMemphis Hall of Fame
Post: #23
RE: let me get this straight..
if you play in the dirt, you get dirty.
04-04-2016 08:39 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Brother Bluto Offline
Banned

Posts: 46,059
Joined: Apr 2009
I Root For: Jamammy
Location: writing the check
Post: #24
RE: let me get this straight..
(04-04-2016 07:42 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  
(04-02-2016 09:19 PM)juggoman Wrote:  
(04-02-2016 09:15 PM)fsquid Wrote:  We negotiated poorly

From the same person that reviewed a certain contract. That she was appointed a Federal Judge by the current administration says it all!

what rulings of hers do you disagree with, and why? How long have you been a lawyer?

I'm gonna need to go stock up on popcorn for this one. We got a few folks on here that really are lawyers. I hope they weigh in


#pagingsalukiandrosstheboss
(This post was last modified: 04-04-2016 08:57 AM by Brother Bluto.)
04-04-2016 08:57 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tiger46 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 24,645
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 316
I Root For: Tigers
Location: Colleyville, TX
Post: #25
RE: let me get this straight..
(04-02-2016 05:19 PM)WESTTNTIGER Wrote:  North Carolina will be playing in the final four tonight... but we cant hang our 2008 final four banner.

I say hang it.
04-04-2016 09:33 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
salukiblue Offline
Liaison to the Dummies
*

Posts: 31,099
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation: 1292
I Root For: Space Mountain
Location: Tennessee
Post: #26
RE: let me get this straight..
(04-04-2016 07:42 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  
(04-02-2016 09:19 PM)juggoman Wrote:  
(04-02-2016 09:15 PM)fsquid Wrote:  We negotiated poorly

From the same person that reviewed a certain contract. That she was appointed a Federal Judge by the current administration says it all!

what rulings of hers do you disagree with, and why? How long have you been a lawyer?

Rulings?

First, when she was appointed she had never been a judge prior to that, so there wouldn't be any "rulings" (as you call them) to make decisions.

Secondly, she is currently a trial level judge now. She isn't an appellate court judge, so her "rulings" aren't generally available for public inspection.

I do take huge exception to her handling of the Rose case and the fact she, at the outset of the hearing, admitted Rose's ineligibility. Once she did that, the University had no "plan B" by which to argue.
04-04-2016 09:34 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UofMemphis Away
Official MT.org Ambassador of Smack
*

Posts: 48,797
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 1129
I Root For: Univ of Memphis
Location: Memphis (Berclair)

Donators
Post: #27
RE: let me get this straight..
(04-04-2016 08:57 AM)Brother Bluto Wrote:  
(04-04-2016 07:42 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  
(04-02-2016 09:19 PM)juggoman Wrote:  
(04-02-2016 09:15 PM)fsquid Wrote:  We negotiated poorly

From the same person that reviewed a certain contract. That she was appointed a Federal Judge by the current administration says it all!

what rulings of hers do you disagree with, and why? How long have you been a lawyer?

I'm gonna need to go stock up on popcorn for this one. We got a few folks on here that really are lawyers. I hope they weigh in


#pagingsalukiandrosstheboss

was anyone talking to you? didn't think so...
04-04-2016 09:36 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
shere khan Offline
Southerner
*

Posts: 60,515
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 7461
I Root For: Tulane
Location: Teh transfer portal
Post: #28
Re: RE: let me get this straight..
(04-04-2016 09:34 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  
(04-04-2016 07:42 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  
(04-02-2016 09:19 PM)juggoman Wrote:  
(04-02-2016 09:15 PM)fsquid Wrote:  We negotiated poorly

From the same person that reviewed a certain contract. That she was appointed a Federal Judge by the current administration says it all!

what rulings of hers do you disagree with, and why? How long have you been a lawyer?

Rulings?

First, when she was appointed she had never been a judge prior to that, so there wouldn't be any "rulings" (as you call them) to make decisions.

Secondly, she is currently a trial level judge now. She isn't an appellate court judge, so her "rulings" aren't generally available for public inspection.

I do take huge exception to her handling of the Rose case and the fact she, at the outset of the hearing, admitted Rose's ineligibility. Once she did that, the University had no "plan B" by which to argue.

Not only that, and i dont remember the details but were there not alums that sued the univ, cal, rc etc and the cases were settled out of court days after she told the press they had no grounds for a lawsuit. Imo poor legal representation was the difference between our punishment and what happened at any number of other schools in similar situations.

Not to mention the utter stupidity of pastners contract.
04-04-2016 09:45 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Brother Bluto Offline
Banned

Posts: 46,059
Joined: Apr 2009
I Root For: Jamammy
Location: writing the check
Post: #29
RE: let me get this straight..
(04-04-2016 09:36 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  
(04-04-2016 08:57 AM)Brother Bluto Wrote:  
(04-04-2016 07:42 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  
(04-02-2016 09:19 PM)juggoman Wrote:  
(04-02-2016 09:15 PM)fsquid Wrote:  We negotiated poorly

From the same person that reviewed a certain contract. That she was appointed a Federal Judge by the current administration says it all!

what rulings of hers do you disagree with, and why? How long have you been a lawyer?

I'm gonna need to go stock up on popcorn for this one. We got a few folks on here that really are lawyers. I hope they weigh in


#pagingsalukiandrosstheboss

was anyone talking to you? didn't think so...

I'll let the legal expert speak for me. Looks like once again your young ass is getting owned

Snicker
04-04-2016 09:47 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
fsquid Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 81,357
Joined: Jan 2004
Reputation: 1835
I Root For: Memphis, Queens (NC)
Location: St Johns, FL

CrappiesCrappiesCrappiesCrappiesMemphis Hall of Fame
Post: #30
RE: let me get this straight..
(04-04-2016 09:34 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  
(04-04-2016 07:42 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  
(04-02-2016 09:19 PM)juggoman Wrote:  
(04-02-2016 09:15 PM)fsquid Wrote:  We negotiated poorly

From the same person that reviewed a certain contract. That she was appointed a Federal Judge by the current administration says it all!

what rulings of hers do you disagree with, and why? How long have you been a lawyer?

Rulings?

First, when she was appointed she had never been a judge prior to that, so there wouldn't be any "rulings" (as you call them) to make decisions.

Secondly, she is currently a trial level judge now. She isn't an appellate court judge, so her "rulings" aren't generally available for public inspection.

I do take huge exception to her handling of the Rose case and the fact she, at the outset of the hearing, admitted Rose's ineligibility. Once she did that, the University had no "plan B" by which to argue.

takes care of that.
04-04-2016 09:57 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Briskbas Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,829
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation: 297
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Around
Post: #31
RE: let me get this straight..
(04-04-2016 09:34 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  
(04-04-2016 07:42 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  
(04-02-2016 09:19 PM)juggoman Wrote:  
(04-02-2016 09:15 PM)fsquid Wrote:  We negotiated poorly

From the same person that reviewed a certain contract. That she was appointed a Federal Judge by the current administration says it all!

what rulings of hers do you disagree with, and why? How long have you been a lawyer?

Rulings?

First, when she was appointed she had never been a judge prior to that, so there wouldn't be any "rulings" (as you call them) to make decisions.

Secondly, she is currently a trial level judge now. She isn't an appellate court judge, so her "rulings" aren't generally available for public inspection.

I do take huge exception to her handling of the Rose case and the fact she, at the outset of the hearing, admitted Rose's ineligibility. Once she did that, the University had no "plan B" by which to argue.

https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/JudgeLipman/

She does have some written opinions available at the link.

There was no real way to argue that Rose was eligible without attacking what the ETS did, and there was no way to do that if Rose was not going to participate in the NCAA inquiry process.

As it is, I don't think anything would have changed if Rose had participated. There was a football player down at Ole Miss who had an entrance exam revoked by the ETS in almost identical circumstances a few years back. Except he cooperated with the inquiry process, claiming that he had hired an attorney who had failed to respond to the ETS when they flagged his test. He maintained throughout the process that he had taken the test. The NCAA still said he was ineligible. However, Ole Miss didn't get any games vacated probably because the guy was a special teams player that only played in 6 games.

It is what it is.
(This post was last modified: 04-04-2016 11:01 AM by Briskbas.)
04-04-2016 10:59 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
salukiblue Offline
Liaison to the Dummies
*

Posts: 31,099
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation: 1292
I Root For: Space Mountain
Location: Tennessee
Post: #32
RE: let me get this straight..
(04-04-2016 10:59 AM)Briskbas Wrote:  
(04-04-2016 09:34 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  
(04-04-2016 07:42 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  
(04-02-2016 09:19 PM)juggoman Wrote:  
(04-02-2016 09:15 PM)fsquid Wrote:  We negotiated poorly

From the same person that reviewed a certain contract. That she was appointed a Federal Judge by the current administration says it all!

what rulings of hers do you disagree with, and why? How long have you been a lawyer?

Rulings?

First, when she was appointed she had never been a judge prior to that, so there wouldn't be any "rulings" (as you call them) to make decisions.

Secondly, she is currently a trial level judge now. She isn't an appellate court judge, so her "rulings" aren't generally available for public inspection.

I do take huge exception to her handling of the Rose case and the fact she, at the outset of the hearing, admitted Rose's ineligibility. Once she did that, the University had no "plan B" by which to argue.

https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/JudgeLipman/

She does have some written opinions available at the link.


Yeah, but those are just all preliminary motions...nothing "meaty" that would lend an insight as to philosophical reasoning/leanings like one might do with appellate opinions.

(04-04-2016 10:59 AM)Briskbas Wrote:  There was no real way to argue that Rose was eligible without attacking what the ETS did, and there was no way to do that if Rose was not going to participate in the NCAA inquiry process.

As it is, I don't think anything would have changed if Rose had participated. There was a player down at Ole Miss who had an entrance exam revoked by the ETS in almost identical circumstances a few years back. Except he cooperated with the inquiry process, claiming that he had hired an attorney who had failed to respond to the ETS when they flagged his test. He maintained throughout the process that he had taken the test. The NCAA still said he was ineligible. However, Ole Miss didn't get any games vacated probably because the guy was a special teams player that only played in 6 games.

It is what it is.


Oh, it was a losing proposition, especially when they were dead to rights with flying Reggie Rose on the team plane at no cost.

I still just would never admit the underlying charge. Hell, just obfuscate, equivocate and deflect, but don't straight up admit.
04-04-2016 11:05 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RekeHavoc Offline
#DoIt4Dez
*

Posts: 2,097
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 92
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Memphis
Post: #33
RE: let me get this straight..
(04-04-2016 09:47 AM)Brother Bluto Wrote:  
(04-04-2016 09:36 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  
(04-04-2016 08:57 AM)Brother Bluto Wrote:  
(04-04-2016 07:42 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  
(04-02-2016 09:19 PM)juggoman Wrote:  From the same person that reviewed a certain contract. That she was appointed a Federal Judge by the current administration says it all!

what rulings of hers do you disagree with, and why? How long have you been a lawyer?

I'm gonna need to go stock up on popcorn for this one. We got a few folks on here that really are lawyers. I hope they weigh in


#pagingsalukiandrosstheboss

was anyone talking to you? didn't think so...

I'll let the legal expert speak for me. Looks like once again your young ass is getting owned

Snicker

Cleanup on aisle 3. 03-lmfao
04-04-2016 12:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
snowtiger Offline
Hall of Flamers
*

Posts: 33,317
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 3707
I Root For: W's!!!
Location: Cascade Volcanic Arc
Post: #34
RE: let me get this straight..
(04-04-2016 11:05 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  
(04-04-2016 10:59 AM)Briskbas Wrote:  
(04-04-2016 09:34 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  
(04-04-2016 07:42 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  
(04-02-2016 09:19 PM)juggoman Wrote:  From the same person that reviewed a certain contract. That she was appointed a Federal Judge by the current administration says it all!

what rulings of hers do you disagree with, and why? How long have you been a lawyer?

Rulings?

First, when she was appointed she had never been a judge prior to that, so there wouldn't be any "rulings" (as you call them) to make decisions.

Secondly, she is currently a trial level judge now. She isn't an appellate court judge, so her "rulings" aren't generally available for public inspection.

I do take huge exception to her handling of the Rose case and the fact she, at the outset of the hearing, admitted Rose's ineligibility. Once she did that, the University had no "plan B" by which to argue.

https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/JudgeLipman/

She does have some written opinions available at the link.


Yeah, but those are just all preliminary motions...nothing "meaty" that would lend an insight as to philosophical reasoning/leanings like one might do with appellate opinions.

(04-04-2016 10:59 AM)Briskbas Wrote:  There was no real way to argue that Rose was eligible without attacking what the ETS did, and there was no way to do that if Rose was not going to participate in the NCAA inquiry process.

As it is, I don't think anything would have changed if Rose had participated. There was a player down at Ole Miss who had an entrance exam revoked by the ETS in almost identical circumstances a few years back. Except he cooperated with the inquiry process, claiming that he had hired an attorney who had failed to respond to the ETS when they flagged his test. He maintained throughout the process that he had taken the test. The NCAA still said he was ineligible. However, Ole Miss didn't get any games vacated probably because the guy was a special teams player that only played in 6 games.

It is what it is.


Oh, it was a losing proposition, especially when they were dead to rights with flying Reggie Rose on the team plane at no cost.

I still just would never admit the underlying charge. Hell, just obfuscate, equivocate and deflect, but don't straight up admit.

That is how it's done.

The NCAA has no choice if you admit. You are supposed to let them slap you around while you protest your innocence.

Never. Ever. Admit. Never. Ever. throw yourself on the mercy of the NCAA.

Game over.
(This post was last modified: 04-04-2016 12:30 PM by snowtiger.)
04-04-2016 12:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Nobody4Prez Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,780
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 207
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Rosemary Beach, FL
Post: #35
RE: let me get this straight..
Interesting how the NCAA allowed Rose to play in the torny

They wanted his tv ratings but after they made their money they decide to drop the hammer
04-04-2016 12:54 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Brother Bluto Offline
Banned

Posts: 46,059
Joined: Apr 2009
I Root For: Jamammy
Location: writing the check
Post: #36
RE: let me get this straight..
(04-04-2016 12:29 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  
(04-04-2016 11:05 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  
(04-04-2016 10:59 AM)Briskbas Wrote:  
(04-04-2016 09:34 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  
(04-04-2016 07:42 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  what rulings of hers do you disagree with, and why? How long have you been a lawyer?

Rulings?

First, when she was appointed she had never been a judge prior to that, so there wouldn't be any "rulings" (as you call them) to make decisions.

Secondly, she is currently a trial level judge now. She isn't an appellate court judge, so her "rulings" aren't generally available for public inspection.

I do take huge exception to her handling of the Rose case and the fact she, at the outset of the hearing, admitted Rose's ineligibility. Once she did that, the University had no "plan B" by which to argue.

https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/JudgeLipman/

She does have some written opinions available at the link.


Yeah, but those are just all preliminary motions...nothing "meaty" that would lend an insight as to philosophical reasoning/leanings like one might do with appellate opinions.

(04-04-2016 10:59 AM)Briskbas Wrote:  There was no real way to argue that Rose was eligible without attacking what the ETS did, and there was no way to do that if Rose was not going to participate in the NCAA inquiry process.

As it is, I don't think anything would have changed if Rose had participated. There was a player down at Ole Miss who had an entrance exam revoked by the ETS in almost identical circumstances a few years back. Except he cooperated with the inquiry process, claiming that he had hired an attorney who had failed to respond to the ETS when they flagged his test. He maintained throughout the process that he had taken the test. The NCAA still said he was ineligible. However, Ole Miss didn't get any games vacated probably because the guy was a special teams player that only played in 6 games.

It is what it is.


Oh, it was a losing proposition, especially when they were dead to rights with flying Reggie Rose on the team plane at no cost.

I still just would never admit the underlying charge. Hell, just obfuscate, equivocate and deflect, but don't straight up admit.

That is how it's done.

The NCAA has no choice if you admit. You are supposed to let them slap you around while you protest your innocence.

Never. Ever. Admit. Never. Ever. throw yourself on the mercy of the NCAA.

Game over.

Your best post ever

Plus 3
04-04-2016 12:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Cletus Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 20,022
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 2109
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Collierville TN
Post: #37
RE: let me get this straight..
(04-04-2016 11:05 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  
(04-04-2016 10:59 AM)Briskbas Wrote:  
(04-04-2016 09:34 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  
(04-04-2016 07:42 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  
(04-02-2016 09:19 PM)juggoman Wrote:  From the same person that reviewed a certain contract. That she was appointed a Federal Judge by the current administration says it all!

what rulings of hers do you disagree with, and why? How long have you been a lawyer?

Rulings?

First, when she was appointed she had never been a judge prior to that, so there wouldn't be any "rulings" (as you call them) to make decisions.

Secondly, she is currently a trial level judge now. She isn't an appellate court judge, so her "rulings" aren't generally available for public inspection.

I do take huge exception to her handling of the Rose case and the fact she, at the outset of the hearing, admitted Rose's ineligibility. Once she did that, the University had no "plan B" by which to argue.

https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/JudgeLipman/

She does have some written opinions available at the link.


Yeah, but those are just all preliminary motions...nothing "meaty" that would lend an insight as to philosophical reasoning/leanings like one might do with appellate opinions.

(04-04-2016 10:59 AM)Briskbas Wrote:  There was no real way to argue that Rose was eligible without attacking what the ETS did, and there was no way to do that if Rose was not going to participate in the NCAA inquiry process.

As it is, I don't think anything would have changed if Rose had participated. There was a player down at Ole Miss who had an entrance exam revoked by the ETS in almost identical circumstances a few years back. Except he cooperated with the inquiry process, claiming that he had hired an attorney who had failed to respond to the ETS when they flagged his test. He maintained throughout the process that he had taken the test. The NCAA still said he was ineligible. However, Ole Miss didn't get any games vacated probably because the guy was a special teams player that only played in 6 games.

It is what it is.


Oh, it was a losing proposition, especially when they were dead to rights with flying Reggie Rose on the team plane at no cost.

I still just would never admit the underlying charge. Hell, just obfuscate, equivocate and deflect, but don't straight up admit.

If I remember correctly Reggie Rose had paid for previous game charter flights with his credit card & his card account number was on file.

Someone in the Athletic who was supposed to take care of this paperwork had let some of the flights slip through without charge.

Bam ........... lack of institutional control

Syracuse, North Carolina in Final Four shows NCAA talk of academics is largely lip-service

[Image: 20052226-mmmain.jpg]
04-04-2016 05:20 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.
MemphisTigers.org is the number one message board for Memphis Tigers sports.