(03-31-2016 10:02 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: (03-31-2016 09:28 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote: Clinton mishandled state secrets...
Which were......?
Clinton has been found to have over 2,000 emails with classified information on her server, 20 rated top secret, and over 100 of which she personally put onto her unsecured email.
It's clear your Democratic Party front runner mishandled state secrets. So
even if you believe her that she technically didn't know about her mishandling of sensitive information, she is unfit to be president.
If a Congressional staffer or an Air Force sergeant handled sensitive or classified information as poorly as has Hillary, they would have been having an uncomfortable discussion with the FBI by the end of the day, all of their electronics would have been confiscated, and any whiff of impropriety would have shown the staffer or the sergeant the door and a court date.
Why does your Dowager Empress get special treatment? You should be embarrassed that your Democrat party has put this woman above the law!
The more and more I see liberals trying to hand wave this away, the more I get their argument: Liberals all know she is lying, but liberals decided that as long as her lies and mishandling of state secrets were told in furtherance of the Progressive Agenda, liberals would let Hillary ride to the Oval Office. Her transgressions matter not......
Hillary’s lies are, of course, brazen and transparent to normal Americans. But the objective that the lies are protecting – electing her President – is too important for liberals to call out the lies as that might jeopardize attainment of the objective.
For shame, liberals.