Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Changing Landscape of TV w/Aresco Quotes
Author Message
Hokie Mark Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 23,789
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 1400
I Root For: VT, ACC teams
Location: Greensboro, NC
Post: #101
RE: Changing Landscape of TV w/Aresco Quotes
Why not play Army /Navy the week before the season begins?
04-01-2016 06:55 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Westhoff123 Offline
Dr. Doom
*

Posts: 11,291
Joined: Feb 2016
Reputation: 208
I Root For: UH
Location: Houston, TX
Post: #102
Changing Landscape of TV w/Aresco Quotes
(04-01-2016 06:55 PM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  Why not play Army /Navy the week before the season begins?

But doesn't fix the conference championship problem.
04-01-2016 07:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
PA-GAMECOCK Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 105
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation: 4
I Root For: Gamecocks
Location:
Post: #103
RE: Changing Landscape of TV w/Aresco Quotes
(03-31-2016 04:12 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  
(03-31-2016 03:49 PM)panama Wrote:  
(03-31-2016 03:19 PM)fishpro1098 Wrote:  
(03-31-2016 02:23 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  
(03-31-2016 01:59 PM)DrBox Wrote:  But wouldn't that have the threat of diminishing the value and brand of the game very quickly. It has essentially become an exhibition game under that scenario, when the teams are in the same league and it means nothing in the league standings, etc.

Why? Its the exact same scenario as it is now. Its a free standing game that affects no conference standings.

Its currently an OOC game for Navy with absolutely no ramifications in their conference standings. Army isn't in a conference, so its never had any significance in any conference standings for them either.

The only difference in housing Navy, Army, and AF under one roof is that all the Commander Cup games fall under the AAC television deal. Two of the 3 would be regular conference games---mainly because the timing of those games has no historical significance. On the other hand, the timing of the Army-Navy game is a significant factor in its value. I wouldn't want to mess with its timing.

Having Army and Navy in the same conference---yet keeping the game as an OOC game, maintaining its special time slot, and having them NEVER meet in conference play just increases the unique nature of the game in my humble opinion. It would be one of those cool little quirks that makes college football so unique.

So would Army and Navy have to be in opposite divisions for that to happen? Can't recall if each division opponent has to play everyone else in the same division. If so, what if Army and Navy were the champions in each division. Would that game become the championship game? Oh the possibilities.


.
But Army doesnt want to be in a conference....

Why? It's just the AAC...it's not like they couldn't compete here lol.

They couldn't beat Yale and New Hampshire when they played them.

Also they currently play 2 - 1AA schools a year and at least on of them comes from the Patriot League (Lafayette, Bucknell, Fordham, and Lehigh).

Yet they are still viewed as P5 competition for the ACC and the SEC so Boston College, Wake Forest, Duke, and Vandy can play them because they have a lot of history with those schools and those schools could potentially beat Army to beef up their OOC wins to get to bowl eligibility at the end of the year.

Wish they could get back on track and win and be competitive like Navy and Air Force again. They sure have fallen on hard times in recent DECADES. Even though they are a great academic institution with past great football history and their players go on to serve and protect this great nation of ours I would let them out there as an independent until they can become competitive again. They are scheduling smaller schools like Boston College, Wake, Duke, Rice, VMI, Fordham, Lafayette, Bucknell, Stony Brook, and Morgan State, that are to do just that at this time. Throw those schools in with a couple of MACS (Buffalo, Eastern Michigan), a couple of AAC teams they play regularly (Temple, UConn, SMU, Tulane, Tulsa), their annual games with Air Force and Navy, their games with Rutgers which float in and out routinely, and one body bag game a year with other P5 schools like ND, Penn St, and Ohio St, then maybe they can get back to respectability with 6&6 and 7&5 seasons. Then they might be comfortable joining a conference again like the AAC. But for now their best bet to get there is to remain independent with the scheduling model they are using now especially with 2 - 1AA teams a year. They can get bowl contracts, TV contracts ($5 million alone for the annual Army - Navy Game each year), fill out their schedule annually with no problems and get P5 schools to play them with their past history with no problems that other G5 schools can't. Finally financial survival is not a problem for West Point because they have the deep pockets of the Federal Government and the American Taxpayers with their primary Mission to Protect and Serve the United States of America like the Air Force and Naval Academies. 06-football 04-cheers 07-coffee3
(This post was last modified: 04-02-2016 09:01 AM by PA-GAMECOCK.)
04-02-2016 08:56 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HP-TBDPITL Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,495
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 82
I Root For: College Sports
Location:
Post: #104
RE: Changing Landscape of TV w/Aresco Quotes
My thinking in having all three would be you make sure they all played each other...and with 7 team divisions, you have 8 games, so no reason it couldn't work. And its in everyone's best interest because them playing each other helps the whole league's TV deal.

What I think Army and Air Force would like about it is that they would have their games against each other as part of their 8 game conference schedule, allowing them to schedule 4 OOC games. Right now Navy has two OOC games against Army and Air Force...and with Notre Dame every year, they only have 1 other OOC game. In this scenario, they get two more. Same thing for Air Force. And if Army wants to schedule down OOC, then they can....playing a local FCS and MAC, CUSA or SBC programs. I don't see how they would say they can't compete.
04-02-2016 10:05 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Knightbengal Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,664
Joined: May 2014
Reputation: 55
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #105
Changing Landscape of TV w/Aresco Quotes
(03-31-2016 04:12 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  
(03-31-2016 03:49 PM)panama Wrote:  
(03-31-2016 03:19 PM)fishpro1098 Wrote:  
(03-31-2016 02:23 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  
(03-31-2016 01:59 PM)DrBox Wrote:  But wouldn't that have the threat of diminishing the value and brand of the game very quickly. It has essentially become an exhibition game under that scenario, when the teams are in the same league and it means nothing in the league standings, etc.

Why? Its the exact same scenario as it is now. Its a free standing game that affects no conference standings.

Its currently an OOC game for Navy with absolutely no ramifications in their conference standings. Army isn't in a conference, so its never had any significance in any conference standings for them either.

The only difference in housing Navy, Army, and AF under one roof is that all the Commander Cup games fall under the AAC television deal. Two of the 3 would be regular conference games---mainly because the timing of those games has no historical significance. On the other hand, the timing of the Army-Navy game is a significant factor in its value. I wouldn't want to mess with its timing.

Having Army and Navy in the same conference---yet keeping the game as an OOC game, maintaining its special time slot, and having them NEVER meet in conference play just increases the unique nature of the game in my humble opinion. It would be one of those cool little quirks that makes college football so unique.

So would Army and Navy have to be in opposite divisions for that to happen? Can't recall if each division opponent has to play everyone else in the same division. If so, what if Army and Navy were the champions in each division. Would that game become the championship game? Oh the possibilities.


.
But Army doesnt want to be in a conference....

Why? It's just the AAC...it's not like they couldn't compete here lol.

They couldn't compete in cusa
04-02-2016 02:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Westhoff123 Offline
Dr. Doom
*

Posts: 11,291
Joined: Feb 2016
Reputation: 208
I Root For: UH
Location: Houston, TX
Post: #106
Changing Landscape of TV w/Aresco Quotes
(04-02-2016 02:18 PM)Knightbengal Wrote:  
(03-31-2016 04:12 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  
(03-31-2016 03:49 PM)panama Wrote:  
(03-31-2016 03:19 PM)fishpro1098 Wrote:  
(03-31-2016 02:23 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  Why? Its the exact same scenario as it is now. Its a free standing game that affects no conference standings.

Its currently an OOC game for Navy with absolutely no ramifications in their conference standings. Army isn't in a conference, so its never had any significance in any conference standings for them either.

The only difference in housing Navy, Army, and AF under one roof is that all the Commander Cup games fall under the AAC television deal. Two of the 3 would be regular conference games---mainly because the timing of those games has no historical significance. On the other hand, the timing of the Army-Navy game is a significant factor in its value. I wouldn't want to mess with its timing.

Having Army and Navy in the same conference---yet keeping the game as an OOC game, maintaining its special time slot, and having them NEVER meet in conference play just increases the unique nature of the game in my humble opinion. It would be one of those cool little quirks that makes college football so unique.

So would Army and Navy have to be in opposite divisions for that to happen? Can't recall if each division opponent has to play everyone else in the same division. If so, what if Army and Navy were the champions in each division. Would that game become the championship game? Oh the possibilities.


.
But Army doesnt want to be in a conference....

Why? It's just the AAC...it's not like they couldn't compete here lol.

They couldn't compete in cusa

Ya army was terrible in c-usa. I think they averaged 2 wins a year.
04-02-2016 02:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Native Georgian Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 27,588
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 1039
I Root For: TULANE+GA.STATE
Location: Decatur GA
Post: #107
RE: Changing Landscape of TV w/Aresco Quotes
(04-02-2016 02:18 PM)Knightbengal Wrote:  
(03-31-2016 04:12 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  
(03-31-2016 03:49 PM)panama Wrote:  [quote='fishpro1098' pid='13159121' dateline='1459455553']Army doesnt want to be in a conference....
Why? It's just the AAC...it's not like they couldn't compete here lol.
They couldn't compete in cusa
Army was a football-only member of C-USA for seven seasons (1998-2004).

The league members were
Army
Cincinnati
East Carolina
Houston
Louisville
Memphis
Southern Miss
Tulane
UAB (1999-2004)
TCU (2001-04)
South Florida (2003-04)
(This post was last modified: 04-02-2016 02:55 PM by Native Georgian.)
04-02-2016 02:55 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Knightbengal Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,664
Joined: May 2014
Reputation: 55
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #108
Changing Landscape of TV w/Aresco Quotes
(04-02-2016 02:55 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  
(04-02-2016 02:18 PM)Knightbengal Wrote:  
(03-31-2016 04:12 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  
(03-31-2016 03:49 PM)panama Wrote:  [quote='fishpro1098' pid='13159121' dateline='1459455553']Army doesnt want to be in a conference....
Why? It's just the AAC...it's not like they couldn't compete here lol.
They couldn't compete in cusa
Army was a football-only member of C-USA for seven seasons (1998-2004).

The league members were
Army
Cincinnati
East Carolina
Houston
Louisville
Memphis
Southern Miss
Tulane
UAB (1999-2004)
TCU (2001-04)
South Florida (2003-04)

Thanks for proving my point
04-02-2016 04:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
slhNavy91 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,879
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 1626
I Root For: Navy
Location:
Post: #109
RE: Changing Landscape of TV w/Aresco Quotes
So...there is a lot of scar tissue at Army West Point regarding the CUSA venture. I do believe that that factor has an outsized impact on Army West Point's thinking today and moving forward.
Despite the overall records now vs then, they may be in better shape as a program - when they entered CUSA, they were playing 3-4 DI-AA a year. They just weren't where they thought they were and that reality-slap sent them into a tailspin. They are now making some structural changes to the program, and I am a big Jeff Monken fan...
04-02-2016 08:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
slhNavy91 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,879
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 1626
I Root For: Navy
Location:
Post: #110
RE: Changing Landscape of TV w/Aresco Quotes
Damn phone posting...
But even if the powers that be want to there will be an upstream swim after that abortive experiment. You can go go back 4-5 years to get a season's worth of Army games against '16 AAC opponents... And Army West Point is like 1-8.
04-02-2016 08:30 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
slhNavy91 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,879
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 1626
I Root For: Navy
Location:
Post: #111
RE: Changing Landscape of TV w/Aresco Quotes
Navy's decision to forego a relatively sweet situation as an independent in 2011 was about looking ahead to 2016, 2020, and beyond...easier to take that longer view after 8 years if success.
04-02-2016 08:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.