Thoughts? I think there is some new rule in place that makes it more difficult to yank a scholly, but i'm not sure. I'll do some research.

(03-17-2016 09:05 PM)82hawk Wrote:  Thoughts? I think there is some new rule in place that makes it more difficult to yank a scholly, but i'm not sure. I'll do some research.

That's pretty nasty but hey the precedent has been set.

Chuck doesn't need this. He's a fine player and apparently wasn't called upon. We shall see but we could do much worse than Chuck for sure.

(03-17-2016 10:26 PM)billthebighawksfan Wrote:  Chuck doesn't need this. He's a fine player and apparently wasn't called upon. We shall see but we could do much worse than Chuck for sure.

I agree 100%. He should not be the fall guy. Same guys will cry foul if a player transfers.

Is it possible that he's a bit hurt? Doesn't really make sense that he didn't play this game especially with the help we needed down low. I'll take him over Bryan any day

If we was a fine player he would have played yesterday. Keatts chose to put Sherwood(who was obviously hurt) in at the 5 rather than Chuck. Sherwood... rail thin, hasn't played the 5 in his career as far as I remember, Sherwood. I can't see him on the court again.

Folks, due to the successful season and the number of family, friends, and who knows... maybe even the players, coaches, or staff that visit these threads, I'm not sure this is a discussion we should be having here. Especially when folks start mentioning which players they see as easily replaceable.