(03-13-2016 12:55 PM)QSECOFR Wrote: If the UC women's team won 20 games per year and got to the NCAA tournament 50% of the time, would attendance increase? If not, it doesn't matter who the coach is.
You never know. Off the cuff I say no, but again, you never know. I would say they would have to be good for a while (multiple 20 win seasons and maybe make a big run to grab attention) and then, yeah, I could see it. Would it ever get like at UCONN...eh, doubt it. Too many options for sports fans. They would have to be elite to start drawing even 5k-7k a game. When I say elite I mean final four multiple years in a row and big recruiting classes, etc.
edit: a good program to look at would be Depaul women's hoops. How do they draw? I don't know but might get an idea from that. Depaul is a really good woman's program in Chicago. Or even Rutgers women's team. How well do they draw? Using UCONN, or Tenn or La Tech isn't really a good comparison because they are in areas where there is zero to do.
edit2: I looked it up. The numbers, from 2014, show ave attendance nationally for women's hoops that year was ~1500. Depaul women's team averaged ~2600.
The really good attendance teams, UCONN, Tenn, UofL, ND, Mich St, Baylor, Neb, were all 6,000-11,000. Notice these schools are in areas where this isn't much to do, as I already said.
Rutgers wasn't on the list of top top 50 and the worst team on the top 50 was at ~2,000 which means RU was less than that. And they have a good women's program.
bottom line...eh, best we could probably hope for was 2,000 a game. Is it worth it? You make the call.