https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKrVegVI0Us

That looks absolutely amazing.

Dude!!!

(03-10-2016 01:22 PM)TigerNK Wrote:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKrVegVI0Us

That looks absolutely amazing.

Whoa! Last 5 seconds make this!

Can't wait.

I am one behind. Waiting to get my home theater remodel done so I can get caught up on a handful of movies. Estimate two more weeks!!

F'ING amazing

(03-10-2016 01:50 PM)TigerBill Wrote:  

(03-10-2016 01:22 PM)TigerNK Wrote:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKrVegVI0Us

That looks absolutely amazing.

Whoa! Last 5 seconds make this!

Absolutely.
"Underoos!!"

(03-11-2016 11:10 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(03-10-2016 01:50 PM)TigerBill Wrote:  

(03-10-2016 01:22 PM)TigerNK Wrote:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKrVegVI0Us

That looks absolutely amazing.

Whoa! Last 5 seconds make this!

Absolutely.
"Underoos!!"

It's almost like the whole universe is new again. Can you imagine what it would be like if Wolverine showed up, or the Fantastic Four?

I think the soon to be expanded world of the Guardians of the Galaxy (and in a few years, the Inhumans) is the Marvel Cinematic Universe equivalent of the X-Men and Fantastic Four. Fox has no intentions of letting go of those 2 properties, even though they can't make a really successful movie without Bryan Singer.

(03-11-2016 12:30 PM)TigerNK Wrote:  I think the soon to be expanded world of the Guardians of the Galaxy (and in a few years, the Inhumans) is the Marvel Cinematic Universe equivalent of the X-Men and Fantastic Four. Fox has no intentions of letting go of those 2 properties, even though they can't make a really successful movie without Bryan Singer.

They are going to have to let go of the fantastic 4 they have to have a movie in production in 4 or 5 years or the rights automatically revert back and I don't see fox green lighting a 4th box office/critical bomb associated with that franchise

(03-11-2016 10:20 PM)MemphisFan95 Wrote:  

(03-11-2016 12:30 PM)TigerNK Wrote:  I think the soon to be expanded world of the Guardians of the Galaxy (and in a few years, the Inhumans) is the Marvel Cinematic Universe equivalent of the X-Men and Fantastic Four. Fox has no intentions of letting go of those 2 properties, even though they can't make a really successful movie without Bryan Singer.

They are going to have to let go of the fantastic 4 they have to have a movie in production in 4 or 5 years or the rights automatically revert back and I don't see fox green lighting a 4th box office/critical bomb associated with that franchise

Yup.

Either they do a spin-off with characters under the FF umbrella like Silver Surfer or Doctor Doom or they revert the rights.

I think Fox ends up working a deal with Disney like Marvel did with Universal when Marvel got the Hulk rights back. I think Universal got some distribution rights on the Incredible Hulk.

But Doctor Doom or Galactius would make for a great villain for phase 4.

(03-11-2016 12:30 PM)TigerNK Wrote:  I think the soon to be expanded world of the Guardians of the Galaxy (and in a few years, the Inhumans) is the Marvel Cinematic Universe equivalent of the X-Men and Fantastic Four. Fox has no intentions of letting go of those 2 properties, even though they can't make a really successful movie without Bryan Singer.

Bryan Singer wasn't involved with The Wolverine or Deadpool and he didn't direct First Class.

He wasn't supposed to direct DOFP. So he isn't the only one who knows how to make an X-Men movie work. Only two directors were involved in the critically panned X-men films.

(03-11-2016 11:35 AM)TigerBill Wrote:  Can you imagine what it would be like if Wolverine showed up, or the Fantastic Four?

As well as EVERY Marvel character ever.

(03-11-2016 12:30 PM)TigerNK Wrote:  I think the soon to be expanded world of the Guardians of the Galaxy (and in a few years, the Inhumans) is the Marvel Cinematic Universe equivalent of the X-Men and Fantastic Four. Fox has no intentions of letting go of those 2 properties, even though they can't make a really successful movie without Bryan Singer.

There were rumors that they'd shoot Hulk into space for the next movie ala Planet Hulk, then he'd meet up with the Guardians like in the comics. Avengers 3 would be errrrryone minus Cap and Iron Man.

(03-13-2016 08:07 PM)3810hFo Wrote:  There were rumors that they'd shoot Hulk into space for the next movie ala Planet Hulk, then he'd meet up with the Guardians like in the comics. Avengers 3 would be errrrryone minus Cap and Iron Man.

I believe it has been confirmed that Hulk will be a big part of Thor 3, which presumably means they are doing a very loose adaption of the Planet Hulk storyline involving Thor being banished to the same planet where Hulk sent himself after Age of Ultron.

They are having to get creative because Hemsworth and Evans only have 1 more solo movie and 1 more Avengers movie left on their contracts. Neither will likely appear in the first Infinity War movie. Thor will probably return to Earth with Hulk and the Guardians in Part 2 and you can pretty much guess Cap's fate if you read the Civil War comic.

(03-14-2016 08:53 AM)TigerNK Wrote:  

(03-13-2016 08:07 PM)3810hFo Wrote:  There were rumors that they'd shoot Hulk into space for the next movie ala Planet Hulk, then he'd meet up with the Guardians like in the comics. Avengers 3 would be errrrryone minus Cap and Iron Man.

I believe it has been confirmed that Hulk will be a big part of Thor 3, which presumably means they are doing a very loose adaption of the Planet Hulk storyline involving Thor being banished to the same planet where Hulk sent himself after Age of Ultron.

They are having to get creative because Hemsworth and Evans only have 1 more solo movie and 1 more Avengers movie left on their contracts. Neither will likely appear in the first Infinity War movie. Thor will probably return to Earth with Hulk and the Guardians in Part 2 and you can pretty much guess Cap's fate if you read the Civil War comic.

They can easily use a different actor as Thor.

Hell, they can use one of the other Hemsworths!

Chris Evans has said he wants to stop acting to direct, supposedly. Hemsworth's only problem would be asking for too much money.

(03-14-2016 09:10 AM)Latilleon Wrote:  They can easily use a different actor as Thor.

Hell, they can use one of the other Hemsworths!

Chris Evans has said he wants to stop acting to direct, supposedly. Hemsworth's only problem would be asking for too much money.

I kinda chuckle at the notion that Hemsworth is so good that Thor has never been the most interesting character in a Thor movie. He does seem a little bland at times.

Evans has since backed off of his retirement talk. He's starting to say he wants to continue with the Marvel universe for acting and go behind the camera outside of Marvel. It's very unlikely Marvel wants to get rid of Evans as Cap, especially considering how popular the character is getting and the fact that Evans is only 34.

With the Bucky-Cap-Tony storyline of Civil War, you can kinda see where Marvel might be going with this in the Infinity War movies.

How did they decide who would play Spider Man?

(03-14-2016 12:39 PM)Tiger46 Wrote:  How did they decide who would play Spider Man?

I think it was just a huge casting call and audition process. This new Spider-Man is the true high school version, so they cast an actor that is 19 and looks 15.

Sony pretty much had to make this deal with Marvel Studios. The general public is tired of them rebooting the franchise so the only logical way to continue making Spidey movies was to strike a deal with Marvel. He will now be an Avenger and the other Marvel characters can appear in Spidey solo movies. I believe Sony still owns all of the rights to the character, but they are allowing Marvel to produce and co-finance the new Spider-Man movies.

(03-14-2016 12:49 PM)TigerNK Wrote:  

(03-14-2016 12:39 PM)Tiger46 Wrote:  How did they decide who would play Spider Man?

I think it was just a huge casting call and audition process. This new Spider-Man is the true high school version, so they cast an actor that is 19 and looks 15.

Sony pretty much had to make this deal with Marvel Studios. The general public is tired of them rebooting the franchise so the only logical way to continue making Spidey movies was to strike a deal with Marvel. He will now be an Avenger and the other Marvel characters can appear in Spidey solo movies. I believe Sony still owns all of the rights to the character, but they are allowing Marvel to produce and co-finance the new Spider-Man movies.

Apparently they were going to use the kid from Hugo (Asa Butterfield) but he made a subtle acknowledgement of the role and they moved away from him.

I don't think they had a huge casting call. They knew their direction, had some choices and they auditioned.