Good preview.


http://thunderinparadise.sportsblog.com/...ament.html

I like the predictions that he has except for the final game - just need to flip the final result and it is a perfect prediction :)

(03-07-2016 04:32 PM)NanoDawg Wrote:  I like the predictions that he has except for the final game - just need to flip the final result and it is a perfect prediction :)

hhmm. You Tech guys might as well start on that spring cleaning your wives have been bugging you about this weekend.

(03-07-2016 04:03 PM)FlyHawk98 Wrote:  Good preview.


http://thunderinparadise.sportsblog.com/...ament.html

(03-07-2016 08:03 PM)BamaScorpio69 Wrote:  

(03-07-2016 04:03 PM)FlyHawk98 Wrote:  Good preview.


http://thunderinparadise.sportsblog.com/...ament.html

It's a Marshall blog what did you expect him to do in the bracket portion? Not pick the Herd? Lol

Of course not. But it wasn't even a preview.....lol

Since 2014, the only team not named UAB to win a game in the Bham city limits was Oregon and they were playing UA-tuscaloosa. Look guys, this ain't gonna happen. We ain't going to lose in Birmingham.

I got a feeling UAB isn't gonna win the tournament just because they're the #1 seed. The two previous seasons when we were the top seed, we didn't win. I'm gonna say Marshall wins just because why not.

UAB vs the field:
91-21 81.9 win % in Birmingham
Overall records:
Charlotte: 28-16
FIU:3-2
FAU: 4-2
LTU:6-3
MU: 17-6
MTSU:10-3
UNT:2-2
ODU:20-9
Rice:12-1
USM:28-17
UTEP:9-8
UTSA:3-0
WKU:21-11

According to the Twitter, 9 number 1 seeds have already went down so far in conference tournaments. Just saying...

(03-07-2016 09:54 PM)RonBurgundy Wrote:  According to the Twitter, 9 number 1 seeds have already went down so far in conference tournaments. Just saying...

I'm not saying that it can't happen. Just that I really really hope it doesn't. I'm not a gambling man for a reason.

I'd pick UAB or Marshall. Love my Dawgs, but I'd be pleasantly shocked if we won the tourney with our depleted roster. Tough to win 3 in 3 days with a short staff. But may the best team win!

(03-07-2016 09:54 PM)RonBurgundy Wrote:  According to the Twitter, 9 number 1 seeds have already went down so far in conference tournaments. Just saying...

interesting logic. So you are saying no #1 seeds will win. Or just UAB

(03-07-2016 10:17 PM)Dracorex Wrote:  

(03-07-2016 09:54 PM)RonBurgundy Wrote:  According to the Twitter, 9 number 1 seeds have already went down so far in conference tournaments. Just saying...

I'm not saying that it can't happen.

That's actually exactly what you were saying:

(03-07-2016 09:35 PM)Dracorex Wrote:  We ain't going to lose in Birmingham.

(03-07-2016 10:38 PM)Memphis Blazer Wrote:  

(03-07-2016 09:54 PM)RonBurgundy Wrote:  According to the Twitter, 9 number 1 seeds have already went down so far in conference tournaments. Just saying...

interesting logic. So you are saying no #1 seeds will win. Or just UAB

We have been there the last few years

(03-07-2016 09:54 PM)RonBurgundy Wrote:  According to the Twitter, 9 number 1 seeds have already went down so far in conference tournaments. Just saying...

(03-07-2016 09:35 PM)Dracorex Wrote:  Since 2014, the only team not named UAB to win a game in the Bham city limits was Oregon and they were playing UA-tuscaloosa. Look guys, this ain't gonna happen. We ain't going to lose in Birmingham.

which is why the tournament needs to be in a neutral location. had to deal with this BS with VCU in the CAA every year.

Utep is coming for all of you!!!

(03-07-2016 09:35 PM)Dracorex Wrote:  Since 2014, the only team not named UAB to win a game in the Bham city limits was Oregon and they were playing UA-tuscaloosa. Look guys, this ain't gonna happen. We ain't going to lose in Birmingham.

Technically, I haven't checked, but Samford and their opponents probably won some games in Birmingham.

as well as Miles and Birmingham Southern.