Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
2015 CFB Season TV Ratings: B1G with Top Ratings
Author Message
Nebraskafan Offline
Banned

Posts: 1,342
Joined: Jul 2015
I Root For: Nebreaska
Location:
Post: #1
2015 CFB Season TV Ratings: B1G with Top Ratings
Zach Barnett
‏@zach_barnett
According to Nielsen, the Big Ten actually got better ratings in 2015 than the SEC http://bit.ly/1QjH4D0

[Image: Nielsen-6.jpg?resize=303%2C218]
02-16-2016 08:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


SeaBlue Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,191
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 43
I Root For: Michigan
Location: Indy
Post: #2
RE: 2015 CFB Season TV Ratings: B1G with Top Ratings
[Image: Nielsen-7.jpg]

Notre Dame doesn't get much love in their neck of the woods? Not buying that.
02-16-2016 08:30 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SeaBlue Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,191
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 43
I Root For: Michigan
Location: Indy
Post: #3
RE: 2015 CFB Season TV Ratings: B1G with Top Ratings
(02-16-2016 08:16 PM)Nebraskafan Wrote:  According to Nielsen, the Big Ten actually got better ratings in 2015 than the SEC

SEC fans must be tired of wining.
02-16-2016 08:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TerryD Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,967
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 926
I Root For: Notre Dame
Location: Grayson Highlands
Post: #4
RE: 2015 CFB Season TV Ratings: B1G with Top Ratings
ND matches up well individually with several entire conferences.
02-16-2016 08:37 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Nebraskafan Offline
Banned

Posts: 1,342
Joined: Jul 2015
I Root For: Nebreaska
Location:
Post: #5
RE: 2015 CFB Season TV Ratings: B1G with Top Ratings
(02-16-2016 08:30 PM)SeaBlue Wrote:  [Image: Nielsen-7.jpg]

Notre Dame doesn't get much love in their neck of the woods? Not buying that.

Notre Dame gets huge ratings. That entire gray area is about a population of 10 million people.
02-16-2016 08:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HeartOfDixie Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 24,689
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 945
I Root For: Alabama
Location: Huntsville AL
Post: #6
RE: 2015 CFB Season TV Ratings: B1G with Top Ratings
It makes sense. There are a lot more people in Big10 country.
02-16-2016 08:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


TerryD Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,967
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 926
I Root For: Notre Dame
Location: Grayson Highlands
Post: #7
RE: 2015 CFB Season TV Ratings: B1G with Top Ratings
(02-16-2016 08:40 PM)Nebraskafan Wrote:  
(02-16-2016 08:30 PM)SeaBlue Wrote:  [Image: Nielsen-7.jpg]

Notre Dame doesn't get much love in their neck of the woods? Not buying that.

Notre Dame gets huge ratings. That entire gray area is about a population of 10 million people.

Chicago is a pro sports town, like New York. The chart shows percentages of population watching college football.

ND's draw is national, not a local or regional one.
02-16-2016 08:42 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SeaBlue Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,191
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 43
I Root For: Michigan
Location: Indy
Post: #8
RE: 2015 CFB Season TV Ratings: B1G with Top Ratings
(02-16-2016 08:37 PM)TerryD Wrote:  ND matches up well individually with several entire conferences.

And yet there is another team, and non-ND networks involved in those games...

So where do the viewers that watched ND vs USC and Stanford get allocated in that chart?
(This post was last modified: 02-16-2016 08:48 PM by SeaBlue.)
02-16-2016 08:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SeaBlue Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,191
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 43
I Root For: Michigan
Location: Indy
Post: #9
RE: 2015 CFB Season TV Ratings: B1G with Top Ratings
(02-16-2016 08:42 PM)TerryD Wrote:  Chicago is a pro sports town, like New York. The chart shows percentages of population watching college football.

Having lived there, I have a hard time believing that St Joe county (home of ND) is ho-hum about football.
02-16-2016 08:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
goofus Online
All American
*

Posts: 4,327
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 151
I Root For: Iowa
Location: chicago suburbs
Post: #10
RE: 2015 CFB Season TV Ratings: B1G with Top Ratings
While all those fancy graphics are very colorful, the data presented does not make much sense. Since they don't do a good job of spelling out what is being measured and how it was measured, it makes all the data seem inconsistent and much like gibberish.

The Big ten had an average viewership of 8.5M ? What does that even mean? It can't possibly mean average of all games they had on tv. Maybe it means total viewership for all games during a week, averaged for all weeks. But they don't really spell it out.

That whole article is badly written dressed up with fancy graphics.
(This post was last modified: 02-16-2016 09:33 PM by goofus.)
02-16-2016 09:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TerryD Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,967
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 926
I Root For: Notre Dame
Location: Grayson Highlands
Post: #11
RE: 2015 CFB Season TV Ratings: B1G with Top Ratings
(02-16-2016 08:46 PM)SeaBlue Wrote:  
(02-16-2016 08:37 PM)TerryD Wrote:  ND matches up well individually with several entire conferences.

And yet there is another team, and non-ND networks involved in those games...

So where do the viewers that watched ND vs USC and Stanford get allocated in that chart?

Nowhere.

There are other (non conference) teams in OOC games against conference teams. I don't see them listed either.
02-16-2016 09:30 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


shere khan Offline
Southerner
*

Posts: 60,784
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 7558
I Root For: Tulane
Location: Teh transfer portal
Post: #12
Re: RE: 2015 CFB Season TV Ratings: B1G with Top Ratings
(02-16-2016 08:16 PM)Nebraskafan Wrote:  Zach Barnett
‏@zach_barnett
According to Nielsen, the Big Ten actually got better ratings in 2015 than the SEC http://bit.ly/1QjH4D0

[Image: Nielsen-6.jpg?resize=303%2C218]

Haha. The difference is SEC fans actually were at the games not wstching them on tv
02-16-2016 09:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Nebraskafan Offline
Banned

Posts: 1,342
Joined: Jul 2015
I Root For: Nebreaska
Location:
Post: #13
RE: 2015 CFB Season TV Ratings: B1G with Top Ratings
(02-16-2016 09:58 PM)shere khan Wrote:  
(02-16-2016 08:16 PM)Nebraskafan Wrote:  Zach Barnett
‏@zach_barnett
According to Nielsen, the Big Ten actually got better ratings in 2015 than the SEC http://bit.ly/1QjH4D0

[Image: Nielsen-6.jpg?resize=303%2C218]

Haha. The difference is SEC fans actually were at the games not wstching them on tv

You saying all of those large stadiums in the B1G were empty?

lol.

You best attempt for SEC SEC SEC failed.
02-16-2016 10:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
shere khan Offline
Southerner
*

Posts: 60,784
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 7558
I Root For: Tulane
Location: Teh transfer portal
Post: #14
Re: RE: 2015 CFB Season TV Ratings: B1G with Top Ratings
(02-16-2016 10:07 PM)Nebraskafan Wrote:  
(02-16-2016 09:58 PM)shere khan Wrote:  
(02-16-2016 08:16 PM)Nebraskafan Wrote:  Zach Barnett
‏@zach_barnett
According to Nielsen, the Big Ten actually got better ratings in 2015 than the SEC http://bit.ly/1QjH4D0

[Image: Nielsen-6.jpg?resize=303%2C218]

Haha. The difference is SEC fans actually were at the games not wstching them on tv

You saying all of those large stadiums in the B1G were empty?

lol.

You best attempt for SEC SEC SEC failed.

Look up the attendance numbers for the SEC vs big not ten

You know im right lol

SEC. 78,000
B10. 67,000
(This post was last modified: 02-16-2016 10:23 PM by shere khan.)
02-16-2016 10:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 66,781
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 3312
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #15
RE: 2015 CFB Season TV Ratings: B1G with Top Ratings
(02-16-2016 09:28 PM)goofus Wrote:  While all those fancy graphics are very colorful, the data presented does not make much sense. Since they don't do a good job of spelling out what is being measured and how it was measured, it makes all the data seem inconsistent and much like gibberish.

The Big ten had an average viewership of 8.5M ? What does that even mean? It can't possibly mean average of all games they had on tv. Maybe it means total viewership for all games during a week, averaged for all weeks. But they don't really spell it out.

That whole article is badly written dressed up with fancy graphics.

Yeh, I don't buy it. Notre Dame is lower than the ACC and Big 12 averages? That's a pretty hard sell. And Big 10 being first isn't consistent with the ratings I saw this season. Is it just talking about bowl viewership? That maybe I could believe.
02-16-2016 10:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Nebraskafan Offline
Banned

Posts: 1,342
Joined: Jul 2015
I Root For: Nebreaska
Location:
Post: #16
RE: 2015 CFB Season TV Ratings: B1G with Top Ratings
(02-16-2016 10:16 PM)shere khan Wrote:  
(02-16-2016 10:07 PM)Nebraskafan Wrote:  
(02-16-2016 09:58 PM)shere khan Wrote:  
(02-16-2016 08:16 PM)Nebraskafan Wrote:  Zach Barnett
‏@zach_barnett
According to Nielsen, the Big Ten actually got better ratings in 2015 than the SEC http://bit.ly/1QjH4D0

[Image: Nielsen-6.jpg?resize=303%2C218]

Haha. The difference is SEC fans actually were at the games not wstching them on tv

You saying all of those large stadiums in the B1G were empty?

lol.

You best attempt for SEC SEC SEC failed.

Look up the attendance numbers for the SEC vs big not ten

You know im right lol

SEC. 78,000
B10. 67,000

so people of both conferences went to games. Interesting.
02-16-2016 10:30 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


krup Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 303
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation: 20
I Root For: Rutgers
Location:
Post: #17
RE: 2015 CFB Season TV Ratings: B1G with Top Ratings
(02-16-2016 10:16 PM)shere khan Wrote:  
(02-16-2016 10:07 PM)Nebraskafan Wrote:  
(02-16-2016 09:58 PM)shere khan Wrote:  
(02-16-2016 08:16 PM)Nebraskafan Wrote:  Zach Barnett
‏@zach_barnett
According to Nielsen, the Big Ten actually got better ratings in 2015 than the SEC http://bit.ly/1QjH4D0

[Image: Nielsen-6.jpg?resize=303%2C218]

Haha. The difference is SEC fans actually were at the games not wstching them on tv

You saying all of those large stadiums in the B1G were empty?

lol.

You best attempt for SEC SEC SEC failed.

Look up the attendance numbers for the SEC vs big not ten

You know im right lol

SEC. 78,000
B10. 67,000

Do you even math? An 11,000 difference in attendance isn't getting you to a 400,000 difference in viewership.
02-17-2016 07:24 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BamaScorpio69 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,602
Joined: Oct 2010
Reputation: 149
I Root For: Non-AQs
Location:
Post: #18
RE: 2015 CFB Season TV Ratings: B1G with Top Ratings
(02-17-2016 07:24 AM)krup Wrote:  Do you even math?

Catchy caption. I can see that printed on the front of a t-shirt made by math geeks.
(This post was last modified: 02-17-2016 07:39 AM by BamaScorpio69.)
02-17-2016 07:38 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 38,236
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 7932
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #19
RE: 2015 CFB Season TV Ratings: B1G with Top Ratings
Just a few things to highlight here:

1. The information presented was broken down selectively by a Big 10 guy talking up future TV contracts. Data and interpretation presented is based upon Nielsen information but is not from Nielsen, but rather reinterpreted by the blogger.

2. The information in the bar chart was said to be from the New Year's Day 6 bowls and not reflective of the entire season.

3. No comprehensive data appears in internet searches so far.

So, no matter who you pull for wear your hip waders while perusing these numbers.
02-17-2016 08:42 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Frank the Tank Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 18,901
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 1841
I Root For: Illinois/DePaul
Location: Chicago
Post: #20
RE: 2015 CFB Season TV Ratings: B1G with Top Ratings
(02-16-2016 10:23 PM)bullet Wrote:  
(02-16-2016 09:28 PM)goofus Wrote:  While all those fancy graphics are very colorful, the data presented does not make much sense. Since they don't do a good job of spelling out what is being measured and how it was measured, it makes all the data seem inconsistent and much like gibberish.

The Big ten had an average viewership of 8.5M ? What does that even mean? It can't possibly mean average of all games they had on tv. Maybe it means total viewership for all games during a week, averaged for all weeks. But they don't really spell it out.

That whole article is badly written dressed up with fancy graphics.

Yeh, I don't buy it. Notre Dame is lower than the ACC and Big 12 averages? That's a pretty hard sell. And Big 10 being first isn't consistent with the ratings I saw this season. Is it just talking about bowl viewership? That maybe I could believe.

It's actually very consistent and it has nothing to do with the bowls. These are numbers that are DIRECT from Nielsen, so it's also not the product of a "biased" Big Ten blogger (regardless of the fact that he posted them).

If you don't want to believe the aggregate numbers, look at Sports Media Watch complete listing of nationally televised college football TV ratings from this past season:

http://www.sportsmediawatch.com/college-...v-ratings/

The Big Ten had 6 conference games that got over a 4.0 rating. It also had 3 non-conference games over a 4.0 rating. There were also 2 other Big Ten conference games that got just under that number at a 3.9 rating.

The only other conference that was comparable was the SEC, which also had 6 conference games that got over a 4.0 rating. It also had 1 non-conference game (the Wisconsin-Alabama Big Ten-SEC matchup) with over a 4.0.

None of the other conferences were even close. For games over 4.0, the ACC had 2 conference games and 2 non-conference games (against Ohio State/Big Ten and Notre Dame). Notre Dame had 2 games (against Clemson and Pac-12/Stanford). The Pac-12 had zero conference games and 2 non-conference games (against Michigan State/Big Ten and Notre Dame). The Big 12 technically had 1 conference game with over a 4.0, but it was actually a split ABC window with the Big Ten where there the Big Ten game actually was in most of the country (so the Big 12 got the benefit of a Big Ten game propping its stat here).

So, of the 4 of the 10 conference game windows with a 4.0 or higher rating were Big Ten games and 3 of the 5 non-conference games that achieved that level involved Big Ten teams. (The other 2 non-conference games involved Notre Dame playing top 10 teams.) We're not even counting the 2 games that were right under at 3.9, which were the 2 highest-rated games outside of that group.

The Nielsen figures posted are right in line with this data - the Big Ten and SEC are substantially ahead of everyone else with a very clear line of demarcation after those two leagues. This has been the case EVERY single year that Nielsen has released this report. I have a lot of critiques of how the Big Ten is run at times, but it is every bit as much of a TV monster as the SEC when it comes to college football. I know a lot of people don't want to believe it because they don't want to believe that members of their own conferences would jump to the Big Ten ASAP if they were invited and/or don't want to believe that the Big Ten is going to break all records with its new TV contracts and/or want to believe that Big Ten expansion didn't work. The data has been completely clear and consistent that all of those people are wrong and in denial about the Big Ten's power compared to everyone outside of the SEC (and this is not just an outlier season - this data has been consistent for YEARS).

EDIT: I missed the Stanford-ND game as also getting over 4.0, so I corrected the numbers accordingly.
(This post was last modified: 02-17-2016 09:52 AM by Frank the Tank.)
02-17-2016 09:45 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.