$200,000+: The only income group Hillary Clinton won last night. Clinton lost by double digits in every other income group.

Here Are The Two Multi-Million Dollar Mansions Hillary Says She “Struggled” To Pay Mortgage On

In an interview with Diane Sawyer, Hillary Clinton claimed that after the White House their family “struggled..to piece together the resources for mortgages, for houses.” The “we struggled to get by” defense from a multi-millionaire might be tough to swallow for Americans actually struggling to pay their mortgage. Hillary, after-all, left the White House having spent 20 years living in gratis government mansions in Little Rock and Washington D.C. Additionally, lets not forget that Bill Clinton’s annual salary was $200,000/year as President and he was able to cash-in on a $50,000 expense account. The Clintons made roughly FOUR times what the average American made and “struggled to get by.”

After leaving the White House, the Clintons bought two multi-million dollar mansions. They bought this $1.7 million mansion in Chappaqua, NY so Hillary could claim residence in the state ahead of her 2000 Senate campaign.



Then they purchased this $2.85 million mansion on Embassy Row in Washington D.C. The home has 5 bedrooms and 6 baths:

Hillary Clinton needed a strong showing in the New Hampshire primary after the virtual tie with Bernie Sanders in Iowa. Instead, Clinton was blown out, losing almost all demographics, regions, and income groups. Here are some of the key numbers from Clinton’s embarrassing New Hampshire primary loss:

34%: The percentage who said the quality most important to them was that a candidate was honest and trustworthy. Among those voters Clinton lost 5% to 91% to Sanders.

17%: The percentage of people who voted for Clinton after saying the top quality they were looking for in a candidate was that they “care about people like me.” Sanders won 82% of those voters.

67%: Senator Sanders’ margin among 18-29 year old voters

$200,000: The only income group Hillary Clinton won last night. Clinton lost by double digits in every other income group.

21,670: The number of fewer votes Clinton got in this year’s New Hampshire primary versus her performance in 2008.

72% to 27%: Bernie Sanders’ margin over Hillary Clinton among independent voters.

41%: The number of points Clinton lost by among voters who put income inequality as their number one issue.

19%: Bernie Sanders margin over Clinton among moderate voters.

11%: Number of points Clinton lost female voters by.

9%: The number of points Clinton lost by among voters who put health care as their number one issue.

They are all for the rich, no matter what they say. Some are just more blatant about it than others.

Just because she is rich doesn't mean that she is FOR the rich.

There are two kinds rich people in this world.

1. People who believe that there is a finite amount of wealth and therefore they must hoard it.

2. People who believe that they have been blessed with the ability to attain wealth and therefore must help others attain it.


So contrary to popular belief, most people don't hate the rich, they only hate the kinds of rich people that think that they have to hoard their wealth from others.

(02-10-2016 02:46 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Just because she is rich doesn't mean that she is FOR the rich.

There are two kinds rich people in this world.

1. People who believe that there is a finite amount of wealth and therefore they must hoard it.

2. People who believe that they have been blessed with the ability to attain wealth and therefore must help others attain it.


So contrary to popular belief, most people don't hate the rich, they only hate the kinds of rich people that think that they have to hoard their wealth from others.

So, in other words, the Clintons? You know, the folks behind your door number one.

(02-10-2016 02:46 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Just because she is rich doesn't mean that she is FOR the rich.

There are two kinds rich people in this world.

1. People who believe that there is a finite amount of wealth and therefore they must hoard it.

2. People who believe that they have been blessed with the ability to attain wealth and therefore must help others attain it.


So contrary to popular belief, most people don't hate the rich, they only hate the kinds of rich people that think that they have to hoard their wealth from others.

You forgot #3 - those who spend it lavishly.

The main problem isn't rich people. The main problem is the playing field is not level. That is why the wealth is concentrated among very few. It has become almost impossible to become "rich" by charting your own path. You cannot compete with the big boys. It is too expensive to comply with regulations, the barriers to entry are too high, and tax structures favor corporations, particularly ones that can afford accounting and financial experts, to individuals. The problem is the government is in the way. The best chance of becoming "rich" is to play ball and become a corporate elite. This is also a major cause of the death of small town America. Progressives make some good points on diagnosing a lot of the problems, but their solutions make it worse.

(02-10-2016 02:46 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Just because she is rich doesn't mean that she is FOR the rich.

There are two kinds rich people in this world.

1. People who believe that there is a finite amount of wealth and therefore they must hoard it.

2. People who believe that they have been blessed with the ability to attain wealth and therefore must help others attain it.


So contrary to popular belief, most people don't hate the rich, they only hate the kinds of rich people that think that they have to hoard their wealth from others.

If there is anyone that is blatantly for the rich, it's the Clintons.

It is kind of funny that Wall Street's best and worst options are both Democrats.

(02-10-2016 02:46 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  There are two kinds rich people in this world.

1. People who believe that there is a finite amount of wealth and therefore they must hoard it.

2. People who believe that they have been blessed with the ability to attain wealth and therefore must help others attain it.

(02-10-2016 02:46 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Just because she is rich doesn't mean that she is FOR the rich.

There are two kinds rich people in this world.

1. People who believe that there is a finite amount of wealth and therefore they must hoard it.

2. People who believe that they have been blessed with the ability to attain wealth and therefore must help others attain it.


So contrary to popular belief, most people don't hate the rich, they only hate the kinds of rich people that think that they have to hoard their wealth from others.

Did you even read the stat that the only demographic she won was people making $200,000+?

I don"t hate the rich or love them. They just are. I want to leave people alone, mostly. The less government bugs and intrudes on anyone's lives, rich or poor, the better.

(02-10-2016 02:30 PM)VA49er Wrote:  They are all for the rich, no matter what they say. Some are just more blatant about it than others.

(02-10-2016 02:46 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Just because she is rich doesn't mean that she is FOR the rich.

There are two kinds rich people in this world.

1. People who believe that there is a finite amount of wealth and therefore they must hoard it.

2. People who believe that they have been blessed with the ability to attain wealth and therefore must help others attain it.


So contrary to popular belief, most people don't hate the rich, they only hate the kinds of rich people that think that they have to hoard their wealth from others.

You're doing a complete 180 there little boy. That's not what you were saying about Romney.


Sigh, how soon we forget.

(02-10-2016 03:46 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-10-2016 02:30 PM)VA49er Wrote:  They are all for the rich, no matter what they say. Some are just more blatant about it than others.

Typical. The same folks that fell for it during the Obama campaigns will fall for it again with Bernie. We're already seeing it.

Someone should go to a Bernie party with a hammer and sickle flag. I'll bet no one would object.

(02-10-2016 04:36 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  Someone should go to a Bernie party with a hammer and sickle flag. I'll bet no one would object.

Good one.

Looks like we have a couple feeling the Bern!

(02-10-2016 04:37 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Looks like we have a couple feeling the Bern!

Herpes?

The clap. Or is it gallstones?

Yeah, I'm really worried a communist will become president. Good one CommieRed.

(02-10-2016 04:44 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(02-10-2016 04:37 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Looks like we have a couple feeling the Bern!

Herpes?

Should I have a reason to think you two have herpes?

(02-10-2016 04:47 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  The clap. Or is it gallstones?

Yeah, I'm really worried a communist will become president. Good one CommieRed.

Socialism <> Communism. Most folks with an ounce of intelligence know this. Perhaps you could go to wiki and educate yourself?