(02-02-2016 11:23 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(02-02-2016 11:21 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(02-02-2016 11:14 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(02-02-2016 10:14 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  http://www.cbsnews.com

Check here for yourself. Not one mention even in the politics section. If I didn't come here It wouldn't even be on my radar. This is what divides us. We have two different news sources.


It's echoed back and forth in the right wing news sites. It's no where else. You guys get upset and my side doesn't think it can possibly be an issue or someone else "in our eyes" credible would report on it. Literally crickets outside of here.

ABC, NBC and CBS are DNC controlled media sites. What reputable group would have George Stephanopolous do the interview of the person questioning the Clinton Foundation activities?

Seriously, Mach-I view those 3 as far more partisan than Fox and I'm not on the right side of the Republican party. MSNBC is an absolute joke, designed for throwing red meat to the low IQ crowd. I don't watch any of them for political news. I watch CNN or Fox.

CNN is liberal, but non-partisan.

Not possible. Either they're non-partisan, or they're liberal. Which is it?

Partisan means they excuse the misdeeds of their party, like Ted Koppel kept trying to defend Bill Clinton's failures or Doonesbury did (and quit being funny). Its like the liberal Democratic columnists who spend all their time writing about Republicans (who they don't understand at all) and never write about Democrats-Mary Sanchez and Jay Bookman for two who appear in the Atlanta paper regularly.
They're apologists and promoters.

(02-02-2016 11:27 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  

(02-02-2016 11:18 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-02-2016 11:16 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(02-02-2016 11:10 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(02-02-2016 11:08 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  Mach is the 2nd most partisan person on this board.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

Who's #1, FitButt or Commie Tom?

Tanker 61. Fit is just a racist who hates that Mexico lost the wars to the USA, even though Mexico is more racist than the USA. Deep down Fit just wants to be a blond surfer trust fund brat, as opposed to a mulatto from Mexico....which is probably a dime a dozen in El Paso.

actually, we are no longer allowed to pick on fit and his troll/idiocy....

it's in the aup.....or so I've been told

Funny how a mod started that thread as soon as that,goon returned. Its pathetic that they can't just call him out on his BS.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

all I know is what in some subjective stupid thingy think tank.......I only point out the obvious whether one likes it or not....

I'm the Italiano version of Bruno...that's all I am....

(02-02-2016 10:01 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Only time I hear if it is when I come on here. It's getting no traction in the main stream press. It does have me honestly worried though.

Just do what a lot of folks on the left do..

If anyone talks about it label them "outside the mainstream" and then you can be sure nobody in the mainstream will talk about it.

Well this was definitely not a "Hall of Fame" post from Mach...

(02-02-2016 10:41 PM)Kronke Wrote:  OP pretends Fox News perpetuates it, but doesn't for a second think the liberal media is suppressing it. Well he does, but he is obviously being disingenuous. Then, he goes so far as to shame us for being partisan. Give me a break.

I've toned down on the subject since I'm terrified Bernie "Give me all your money" Sanders may win the nomination.

(02-02-2016 11:16 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(02-02-2016 11:10 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(02-02-2016 11:08 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  Mach is the 2nd most partisan person on this board.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

Who's #1, FitButt or Commie Tom?

Tanker 61. Fit is just a racist who hates that Mexico lost the wars to the USA, even though Mexico is more racist than the USA. Deep down Fit just wants to be a blond surfer trust fund brat, as opposed to a mulatto from Mexico....which is probably a dime a dozen in El Paso.

Now I know what Mach was talking about when he said people talk smack about him on a thread when he hasn't even posted on it.

She's guilty as sin and the media is corrupt. What else is there to say?

This leads to the ever increasing anger. This doesn't seem to get the play and the righties on here at least are pretty adamant she is guilty and disqualified. You don't get that in other areas. I'll google it and see if any mainstream press thinks Hillary is disqualified.

(02-02-2016 10:01 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Only time I hear if it is when I come on here. It's getting no traction in the main stream press. It does have me honestly worried though.

Hey Mach - you probably aren't old enough to remember the Russian "news" media called TASS. They were no more than the media arm of the Communist government and only reported stories showing the government as benevolent and suppressed any and all stories of the bad stuff that government did to their people.

The mainstream media you tout (ABC, NBC, CBS) has become basically like that in this country for the Democratic party and just like TASS - they try and pass themselves off a unbiased journalists. If they were honest - they'd wear cheerleader outfits with a big "D" on the front during their newscasts.

(02-03-2016 09:32 AM)Crebman Wrote:  [quote='Machiavelli' pid='12962083' dateline='1454468473']
Only time I hear if it is when I come on here. It's getting no traction in the main stream press. It does have me honestly worried though.

Hey Mach - you probably aren't old enough to remember the Russian "news" media called TASS. They were no more than the media arm of the Communist government and only reported stories showing the government as benevolent and suppressed any and all stories of the bad stuff that government did to their people.

The mainstream media you tout (ABC, NBC, CBS) has become basically like that in this country for the Democratic party and just like TASS - they try and pass themselves off a unbiased journalists. If they were honest - they'd wear cheerleader outfits with a big "D" on the front during their newscasts.



They pretty much looked the other way during Bush's war too. I don't think it's carrying water for one party as much as it is just lack of investigative reporting. They are either lazy or no longer have the resources.

(02-03-2016 09:53 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  They pretty much looked the other way during Bush's war too.

They did what? Are you kidding?

(02-03-2016 09:53 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(02-03-2016 09:32 AM)Crebman Wrote:  [quote='Machiavelli' pid='12962083' dateline='1454468473']
Only time I hear if it is when I come on here. It's getting no traction in the main stream press. It does have me honestly worried though.

Hey Mach - you probably aren't old enough to remember the Russian "news" media called TASS. They were no more than the media arm of the Communist government and only reported stories showing the government as benevolent and suppressed any and all stories of the bad stuff that government did to their people.

The mainstream media you tout (ABC, NBC, CBS) has become basically like that in this country for the Democratic party and just like TASS - they try and pass themselves off a unbiased journalists. If they were honest - they'd wear cheerleader outfits with a big "D" on the front during their newscasts.



They pretty much looked the other way during Bush's war too. I don't think it's carrying water for one party as much as it is just lack of investigative reporting. They are either lazy or no longer have the resources.

(02-03-2016 09:32 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  This leads to the ever increasing anger. This doesn't seem to get the play and the righties on here at least are pretty adamant she is guilty and disqualified. You don't get that in other areas. I'll google it and see if any mainstream press thinks Hillary is disqualified.

She is guilty. There aren't even any questions about it. If people want to ignore that fact, no one can force them to face it. But she IS guilty.

The lack of resources is going to continue being a problem moving forward. In my opinion.

https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=ch...t&start=10

Washington Examiner and facebook rants. Look for yourself. I'll look for left leaning defenses.

(02-03-2016 10:08 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(02-03-2016 09:32 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  This leads to the ever increasing anger. This doesn't seem to get the play and the righties on here at least are pretty adamant she is guilty and disqualified. You don't get that in other areas. I'll google it and see if any mainstream press thinks Hillary is disqualified.

She is guilty. There aren't even any questions about it. If people want to ignore that fact, no one can force them to face it. But she IS guilty.

Yep. The only question remaining is "will the executive branch do the job they swore to do - uphold the laws of the country" or will they pick team over country?

Unfortunately, I think a lot depends on how much Obama hates the Clintons versus how much under the table money he'll get if he breaks his oath of office and lets her off.

(02-03-2016 09:53 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  They pretty much looked the other way during Bush's war too. I don't think it's carrying water for one party as much as it is just lack of investigative reporting. They are either lazy or no longer have the resources.

(02-03-2016 09:53 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(02-03-2016 09:32 AM)Crebman Wrote:  [quote='Machiavelli' pid='12962083' dateline='1454468473']
Only time I hear if it is when I come on here. It's getting no traction in the main stream press. It does have me honestly worried though.

Hey Mach - you probably aren't old enough to remember the Russian "news" media called TASS. They were no more than the media arm of the Communist government and only reported stories showing the government as benevolent and suppressed any and all stories of the bad stuff that government did to their people.

The mainstream media you tout (ABC, NBC, CBS) has become basically like that in this country for the Democratic party and just like TASS - they try and pass themselves off a unbiased journalists. If they were honest - they'd wear cheerleader outfits with a big "D" on the front during their newscasts.



They pretty much looked the other way during Bush's war too. I don't think it's carrying water for one party as much as it is just lack of investigative reporting. They are either lazy or no longer have the resources.

This is about Hillary, not Bush... stick to the topic.

(02-03-2016 10:08 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(02-03-2016 09:32 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  This leads to the ever increasing anger. This doesn't seem to get the play and the righties on here at least are pretty adamant she is guilty and disqualified. You don't get that in other areas. I'll google it and see if any mainstream press thinks Hillary is disqualified.

She is guilty. There aren't even any questions about it. If people want to ignore that fact, no one can force them to face it. But she IS guilty.

some of these laws do not even require "intent". just the mere fact that she is transmitting or retaining in an unsecure manner or simply failed to disclosed is enough. she is GUILTY.

I think Obama was really trying to just run out the clock. If Hillary were to become President, she would merely do a Nixon and compel the FBI to stop investigating. I think it's getting so bad now that Obama may have let whatever happens...happen.