A Dem deciding not to believe Hillary broke the law with her private email server containing top secret emails would be equivalent to Republicans not believing Richard Nixon broke the law in Watergate.

(02-02-2016 10:14 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  http://www.cbsnews.com

Check here for yourself. Not one mention even in the politics section. If I didn't come here It wouldn't even be on my radar. This is what divides us. We have two different news sources.


It's echoed back and forth in the right wing news sites. It's no where else. You guys get upset and my side doesn't think it can possibly be an issue or someone else "in our eyes" credible would report on it. Literally crickets outside of here.

It's not that your news sources don't think it's credible, it's that they are burying it. Come on man, you know how biased the media is. They are covering for her.

Nixon held on for how long? and what is scarier. Would he even bother to resign in today's political climate?


Answer me this. Is it a scandal when only "some" people (who wouldn't have voted for her anyways) thinks it is. It's not getting the play.

I should make up bumper stickers. Vote for the criminal. It's important.

Here's what I think happens. No indictment. They play it off as politics as usual. Clinton's are good at this. She wins nomination and presidency. Her supporters will outnumber her detractors. That's the bottom line. Mainstream media won't cover it like the right wing media will. I gaurantee you that. We shall see.

Mach is the 2nd most partisan person on this board.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

(02-02-2016 11:08 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  Mach is the 2nd most partisan person on this board.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

Who's #1, FitButt or Commie Tom?

(02-02-2016 10:19 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  I would say the Big 3. Time. US News and World Report. Honestly. I go to Drudge to hear what you guys will be talking about and Huffington Post to find what the left wants to talk about. We don't have a trusted news source and we are distrustful of the other side.

so, you do 'watch' it....

that's the point to salvage sanity....

trust me on this one....

and I know everyone thinks I'm batshite crazy....

it's 'liberating' when one gives it up.....much easier....

(02-02-2016 11:02 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Nixon held on for how long? and what is scarier. Would he even bother to resign in today's political climate?


Answer me this. Is it a scandal when only "some" people (who wouldn't have voted for her anyways) thinks it is. It's not getting the play.

this poster thought Nixon was a POS too.....

(02-02-2016 10:14 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  http://www.cbsnews.com

Check here for yourself. Not one mention even in the politics section. If I didn't come here It wouldn't even be on my radar. This is what divides us. We have two different news sources.


It's echoed back and forth in the right wing news sites. It's no where else. You guys get upset and my side doesn't think it can possibly be an issue or someone else "in our eyes" credible would report on it. Literally crickets outside of here.

ABC, NBC and CBS are DNC controlled media sites. What reputable group would have George Stephanopolous do the interview of the person questioning the Clinton Foundation activities?

(02-02-2016 10:51 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  A Dem deciding not to believe Hillary broke the law with her private email server containing top secret emails would be equivalent to Republicans not believing Richard Nixon broke the law in Watergate.

Republicans had more integrity. Howard Baker, Barry Goldwater, etc.

(02-02-2016 11:04 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  I should make up bumper stickers. Vote for the criminal. It's important.

If it ain't white, it ain't right! - Hillary 2016

(02-02-2016 10:39 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  If this was something that could derail her campaign wouldn't it be on the front page of something on Feb. 2nd?

If it were on the front page it would derail her candidacy. That's why it's not on the front page. The people who decide what goes on the front page don't want to see her candidacy derailed.

(02-02-2016 11:14 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(02-02-2016 10:14 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  http://www.cbsnews.com

Check here for yourself. Not one mention even in the politics section. If I didn't come here It wouldn't even be on my radar. This is what divides us. We have two different news sources.


It's echoed back and forth in the right wing news sites. It's no where else. You guys get upset and my side doesn't think it can possibly be an issue or someone else "in our eyes" credible would report on it. Literally crickets outside of here.

ABC, NBC and CBS are DNC controlled media sites. What reputable group would have George Stephanopolous do the interview of the person questioning the Clinton Foundation activities?

Seriously, Mach-I view those 3 as far more partisan than Fox and I'm not on the right side of the Republican party. MSNBC is an absolute joke, designed for throwing red meat to the low IQ crowd. I don't watch any of them for political news. I watch CNN or Fox.

CNN is liberal, but non-partisan.

(02-02-2016 11:17 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(02-02-2016 11:04 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  I should make up bumper stickers. Vote for the criminal. It's important.

If it ain't white, it ain't right! - Hillary 2016

Infowars is way ahead of you.

http://store.infowars.com/Hillary-For-Pr..._1692.html

(02-02-2016 11:10 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(02-02-2016 11:08 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  Mach is the 2nd most partisan person on this board.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

Who's #1, FitButt or Commie Tom?

CommieTom. Fitbud is the dumbest, unless he is just an expert troll. I honestly can't tell.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

(02-02-2016 11:19 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(02-02-2016 10:39 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  If this was something that could derail her campaign wouldn't it be on the front page of something on Feb. 2nd?

If it were on the front page it would derail her candidacy. That's why it's not on the front page. The people who decide what goes on the front page don't want to see her candidacy derailed.

yepper....

their numbers need her in office more than trump.....which in essence, is shocking....

this shite just cracks me up in totality.....

(02-02-2016 11:21 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(02-02-2016 11:14 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(02-02-2016 10:14 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  http://www.cbsnews.com

Check here for yourself. Not one mention even in the politics section. If I didn't come here It wouldn't even be on my radar. This is what divides us. We have two different news sources.


It's echoed back and forth in the right wing news sites. It's no where else. You guys get upset and my side doesn't think it can possibly be an issue or someone else "in our eyes" credible would report on it. Literally crickets outside of here.

ABC, NBC and CBS are DNC controlled media sites. What reputable group would have George Stephanopolous do the interview of the person questioning the Clinton Foundation activities?

Seriously, Mach-I view those 3 as far more partisan than Fox and I'm not on the right side of the Republican party. MSNBC is an absolute joke, designed for throwing red meat to the low IQ crowd. I don't watch any of them for political news. I watch CNN or Fox.

CNN is liberal, but non-partisan.

Not possible. Either they're non-partisan, or they're liberal. Which is it?

(02-02-2016 11:22 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(02-02-2016 11:17 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(02-02-2016 11:04 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  I should make up bumper stickers. Vote for the criminal. It's important.

If it ain't white, it ain't right! - Hillary 2016

Infowars is way ahead of you.

http://store.infowars.com/Hillary-For-Pr..._1692.html

They should also run with my suggestion.

(02-02-2016 11:18 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-02-2016 11:16 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(02-02-2016 11:10 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(02-02-2016 11:08 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  Mach is the 2nd most partisan person on this board.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

Who's #1, FitButt or Commie Tom?

Tanker 61. Fit is just a racist who hates that Mexico lost the wars to the USA, even though Mexico is more racist than the USA. Deep down Fit just wants to be a blond surfer trust fund brat, as opposed to a mulatto from Mexico....which is probably a dime a dozen in El Paso.

actually, we are no longer allowed to pick on fit and his troll/idiocy....

it's in the aup.....or so I've been told

Funny how a mod started that thread as soon as that,goon returned. Its pathetic that they can't just call him out on his BS.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk