Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Texas' hands may be tied. OMG!
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
Dasville Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,796
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 246
I Root For: UofL
Location:
Post: #1
Texas' hands may be tied. OMG!
Not really OMG! but rather IMG.

It might not matter what Texas wants to do! Excellent blog by mattsarz on the matter:


IMG might own Texas media rights



From the link:

Quote:2) The part I intended to write this whole post about - "ESPN just buy out Texas of the Longhorn Network". I've seen it asked of Frank a couple times and he's politely put it down. Here are several other things to consider. I'm going to reference several items from the open records request The Midnight Yell did several years ago:
Are you buying out Texas or IMG? IMG is a party to this network. Texas sold them the rights to market the content. In fact, when you look at the license agreement, courtesy of The Midnight Yell, it is clear that IMG is sublicensing Texas's rights to ESPN (see page 3 under Television Rights).
Also, if I'm reading this correctly and I may not be, I believe ESPN is covered in the event IMG is no longer Texas's marketing partner. There's a few sentences in there that ESPN would be granted the rights directly in the event the "Rights Agreement" expires or is terminated and I believe that pertains to IMG, who may not have had a 20 year agreement with Texas.
01-28-2016 07:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 38,246
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 7943
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #2
RE: Texas' hands may be tied. OMG!
(01-28-2016 07:11 PM)Dasville Wrote:  Not really OMG! but rather IMG.

It might not matter what Texas wants to do! Excellent blog by mattsarz on the matter:


IMG might own Texas media rights



From the link:

Quote:2) The part I intended to write this whole post about - "ESPN just buy out Texas of the Longhorn Network". I've seen it asked of Frank a couple times and he's politely put it down. Here are several other things to consider. I'm going to reference several items from the open records request The Midnight Yell did several years ago:
Are you buying out Texas or IMG? IMG is a party to this network. Texas sold them the rights to market the content. In fact, when you look at the license agreement, courtesy of The Midnight Yell, it is clear that IMG is sublicensing Texas's rights to ESPN (see page 3 under Television Rights).
Also, if I'm reading this correctly and I may not be, I believe ESPN is covered in the event IMG is no longer Texas's marketing partner. There's a few sentences in there that ESPN would be granted the rights directly in the event the "Rights Agreement" expires or is terminated and I believe that pertains to IMG, who may not have had a 20 year agreement with Texas.

If ESPN sublet the rights to IMG, then should IMG terminate that lease, the remaining cost of the contract would simply fall upon ESPN again and that contract does not terminate until 2034.
01-28-2016 08:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Dasville Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,796
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 246
I Root For: UofL
Location:
Post: #3
RE: Texas' hands may be tied. OMG!
(01-28-2016 08:11 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(01-28-2016 07:11 PM)Dasville Wrote:  Not really OMG! but rather IMG.

It might not matter what Texas wants to do! Excellent blog by mattsarz on the matter:


IMG might own Texas media rights



From the link:

Quote:2) The part I intended to write this whole post about - "ESPN just buy out Texas of the Longhorn Network". I've seen it asked of Frank a couple times and he's politely put it down. Here are several other things to consider. I'm going to reference several items from the open records request The Midnight Yell did several years ago:
Are you buying out Texas or IMG? IMG is a party to this network. Texas sold them the rights to market the content. In fact, when you look at the license agreement, courtesy of The Midnight Yell, it is clear that IMG is sublicensing Texas's rights to ESPN (see page 3 under Television Rights).
Also, if I'm reading this correctly and I may not be, I believe ESPN is covered in the event IMG is no longer Texas's marketing partner. There's a few sentences in there that ESPN would be granted the rights directly in the event the "Rights Agreement" expires or is terminated and I believe that pertains to IMG, who may not have had a 20 year agreement with Texas.

If ESPN sublet the rights to IMG, then should IMG terminate that lease, the remaining cost of the contract would simply fall upon ESPN again and that contract does not terminate until 2034.

That's not how I read it but you may be correct. I read it as IMG subletting rights to ESPN. If that is indeed the case, then Texas doesn't have the only say in this matter.
01-28-2016 10:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.