.........or words to that effect?

Come on now.

We just won a New Year's Six bowl for this conference, beating a Top Ten team soundly, and are now almost guaranteed a Top Ten finish in both polls.

If anything, that means that UH ENHANCES this conference's football pedigree. I can't imagine one claiming that a program that does that for a conference hurts its pedigree.

Also, when you consider that UH will now have FIVE such top ten finishes in its school history, and that the critic's school (I believe he was a USF fan) doesn't even have so much as a top 25 finish, much less a top ten finish, in its history, it is hard to say that adding UH hurts the conference's football pedigree so much as having USF in the conference does.

probably quo vadis

(01-02-2016 07:12 PM)UH Law 97 Wrote:  .........or words to that effect?

Come on now.

We just won a New Year's Six bowl for this conference, beating a Top Ten team soundly, and are now almost guaranteed a Top Ten finish in both polls.

If anything, that means that UH ENHANCES this conference's football pedigree. I can't imagine one claiming that a program that does that for a conference hurts its pedigree.

Also, when you consider that UH will now have FIVE such top ten finishes in its school history, and the critic'ss school (I believe he was a USF fan) doesn't even have so much as a top 25 finish, much less a top ten finish in its history, it is hard to say that adding UH hurts the conference's football pedigree so much as having USF in the conference does.

ok, you don't know who the poster was or from what school he was from but hey lets jump on USF
There are plenty on this board that have talked crap about others programs when things are down.

Bill Yeoman had 4 by himself. This has to be 6 top 10 finishes, including 1990.

(01-02-2016 07:15 PM)Cubanbull Wrote:  

(01-02-2016 07:12 PM)UH Law 97 Wrote:  .........or words to that effect?

Come on now.

We just won a New Year's Six bowl for this conference, beating a Top Ten team soundly, and are now almost guaranteed a Top Ten finish in both polls.

If anything, that means that UH ENHANCES this conference's football pedigree. I can't imagine one claiming that a program that does that for a conference hurts its pedigree.

Also, when you consider that UH will now have FIVE such top ten finishes in its school history, and the critic'ss school (I believe he was a USF fan) doesn't even have so much as a top 25 finish, much less a top ten finish in its history, it is hard to say that adding UH hurts the conference's football pedigree so much as having USF in the conference does.

ok, you don't know who the poster was or from what school he was from but hey lets jump on USF
There are plenty on this board that have talked crap about others programs when things are down.

I picked not so much on USF, but on the guy that posted those words, who I distinctly remember was a USF fan.

In fact, I believe that it was Quo Vadis.

If it was (and I'm now thinking that it was), then I'd like to see him step forward and be made accountable for his words.

(01-02-2016 07:14 PM)BigEastHomer Wrote:  probably quo vadis

LOL... Yes, let's blame quo for everything... Heck, I didn't get ketchup with my burger n fries order, I'm blaming quo for that. lol

(01-02-2016 07:31 PM)UH Law 97 Wrote:  

(01-02-2016 07:15 PM)Cubanbull Wrote:  

(01-02-2016 07:12 PM)UH Law 97 Wrote:  .........or words to that effect?

Come on now.

We just won a New Year's Six bowl for this conference, beating a Top Ten team soundly, and are now almost guaranteed a Top Ten finish in both polls.

If anything, that means that UH ENHANCES this conference's football pedigree. I can't imagine one claiming that a program that does that for a conference hurts its pedigree.

Also, when you consider that UH will now have FIVE such top ten finishes in its school history, and the critic'ss school (I believe he was a USF fan) doesn't even have so much as a top 25 finish, much less a top ten finish in its history, it is hard to say that adding UH hurts the conference's football pedigree so much as having USF in the conference does.

ok, you don't know who the poster was or from what school he was from but hey lets jump on USF
There are plenty on this board that have talked crap about others programs when things are down.

I picked not so much on USF, but on the guy that posted those words, who I distinctly remember was a USF fan.

In fact, I believe that it was Quo Vadis.

If it was (and I'm now thinking that it was), then I'd like to see him step forward and be made accountable for his words.

And if it's Quo, then you should know he thinks ALL the AAC is crap.

(01-02-2016 07:31 PM)UH Law 97 Wrote:  

(01-02-2016 07:15 PM)Cubanbull Wrote:  

(01-02-2016 07:12 PM)UH Law 97 Wrote:  .........or words to that effect?

Come on now.

We just won a New Year's Six bowl for this conference, beating a Top Ten team soundly, and are now almost guaranteed a Top Ten finish in both polls.

If anything, that means that UH ENHANCES this conference's football pedigree. I can't imagine one claiming that a program that does that for a conference hurts its pedigree.

Also, when you consider that UH will now have FIVE such top ten finishes in its school history, and the critic'ss school (I believe he was a USF fan) doesn't even have so much as a top 25 finish, much less a top ten finish in its history, it is hard to say that adding UH hurts the conference's football pedigree so much as having USF in the conference does.

ok, you don't know who the poster was or from what school he was from but hey lets jump on USF
There are plenty on this board that have talked crap about others programs when things are down.

I picked not so much on USF, but on the guy that posted those words, who I distinctly remember was a USF fan.

In fact, I believe that it was Quo Vadis.

If it was (and I'm now thinking that it was), then I'd like to see him step forward and be made accountable for his words.

Hold someone accountable on a message board? Yea ok, good luck with that. Lol

Wow, I have seen some lame a$$ threads on here, but seriously? Go lick yourself in private. SMH

It was probably one of the silly g4 fans.

It was ShockerBob

(01-02-2016 07:31 PM)UH Law 97 Wrote:  

(01-02-2016 07:15 PM)Cubanbull Wrote:  

(01-02-2016 07:12 PM)UH Law 97 Wrote:  .........or words to that effect?

Come on now.

We just won a New Year's Six bowl for this conference, beating a Top Ten team soundly, and are now almost guaranteed a Top Ten finish in both polls.

If anything, that means that UH ENHANCES this conference's football pedigree. I can't imagine one claiming that a program that does that for a conference hurts its pedigree.

Also, when you consider that UH will now have FIVE such top ten finishes in its school history, and the critic'ss school (I believe he was a USF fan) doesn't even have so much as a top 25 finish, much less a top ten finish in its history, it is hard to say that adding UH hurts the conference's football pedigree so much as having USF in the conference does.

ok, you don't know who the poster was or from what school he was from but hey lets jump on USF
There are plenty on this board that have talked crap about others programs when things are down.

I picked not so much on USF, but on the guy that posted those words, who I distinctly remember was a USF fan.

In fact, I believe that it was Quo Vadis.

If it was (and I'm now thinking that it was), then I'd like to see him step forward and be made accountable for his words.

The ultimate being "made accountable" is being 100% ignored. As long as we respond he will keep playing for the attention he craves. Ignore him and he will eventually go away or become a normal person here....and I'm as guilty to responding to him as anyone else here is.

And we're ever so humble.

(01-02-2016 07:12 PM)UH Law 97 Wrote:  .........or words to that effect?

Come on now.

We just won a New Year's Six bowl for this conference, beating a Top Ten team soundly, and are now almost guaranteed a Top Ten finish in both polls.

If anything, that means that UH ENHANCES this conference's football pedigree. I can't imagine one claiming that a program that does that for a conference hurts its pedigree.

Also, when you consider that UH will now have FIVE such top ten finishes in its school history, and that the critic's school (I believe he was a USF fan) doesn't even have so much as a top 25 finish, much less a top ten finish, in its history, it is hard to say that adding UH hurts the conference's football pedigree so much as having USF in the conference does.

nobody said that about UH specifically....the conference sunk when WVA, Cuse, UofL, etc bolted along with Gtown, Nova, etc

(01-02-2016 07:31 PM)UH Law 97 Wrote:  

(01-02-2016 07:15 PM)Cubanbull Wrote:  

(01-02-2016 07:12 PM)UH Law 97 Wrote:  .........or words to that effect?

Come on now.

We just won a New Year's Six bowl for this conference, beating a Top Ten team soundly, and are now almost guaranteed a Top Ten finish in both polls.

If anything, that means that UH ENHANCES this conference's football pedigree. I can't imagine one claiming that a program that does that for a conference hurts its pedigree.

Also, when you consider that UH will now have FIVE such top ten finishes in its school history, and the critic'ss school (I believe he was a USF fan) doesn't even have so much as a top 25 finish, much less a top ten finish in its history, it is hard to say that adding UH hurts the conference's football pedigree so much as having USF in the conference does.

ok, you don't know who the poster was or from what school he was from but hey lets jump on USF
There are plenty on this board that have talked crap about others programs when things are down.

I picked not so much on USF, but on the guy that posted those words, who I distinctly remember was a USF fan.

In fact, I believe that it was Quo Vadis.

If it was (and I'm now thinking that it was), then I'd like to see him step forward and be made accountable for his words.

No need to guess and start a troll thread...just use search feature and then you can direct your comment directly to said poster via a private DM.

The AAC Bowl season was train wreck and we are looking at another mid major level showing in hoops this year.

UH bowl win was good but it doesnt make this crap conference look good vs wretched overall bowl record and two teams we will place in the big dance

Welcome to realityville......Im the mayor

(01-02-2016 09:19 PM)rtaylor Wrote:  Wow, I have seen some lame a$$ threads on here, but seriously? Go lick yourself in private. SMH

Thank you. You made me laugh, I saw this thread and was like someone is really struggling for attention.

(01-03-2016 10:34 AM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  The AAC Bowl season was train wreck and we are looking at another mid major level showing in hoops this year.

UH bowl win was good but it doesnt make this crap conference look good vs wretched overall bowl record and two teams we will place in the big dance

Welcome to realityville......Im the mayor

Yeah and in realityville the big east did well in bowl season and that seemed to matter a whole lot... oh wait. In reality if you can produce ranked teams so they can pump ratings for conference championships and big bowls then you are a strong viable conference. We did that this year and if we can manage what we did this year every year even with a ****** bowl showing it'll be worth a million cure bowls or whatever y ou seem to think matters over there in realityville.

(01-03-2016 10:58 AM)ECBrad Wrote:  

(01-03-2016 10:34 AM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  The AAC Bowl season was train wreck and we are looking at another mid major level showing in hoops this year.

UH bowl win was good but it doesnt make this crap conference look good vs wretched overall bowl record and two teams we will place in the big dance

Welcome to realityville......Im the mayor

Yeah and in realityville the big east did well in bowl season and that seemed to matter a whole lot... oh wait. In reality if you can produce ranked teams so they can pump ratings for conference championships and big bowls then you are a strong viable conference. We did that this year and if we can manage what we did this year every year even with a ****** bowl showing it'll be worth a million cure bowls or whatever y ou seem to think matters over there in realityville.

LOL our bowls are a joke + we didnt win most of them

quality

I pay no attention to Quo, I know he likes to stir the pot.