http://townhall.com/columnists/michaelbr...r-n2098307

According to the story published by Fox Latino News, “A couple in Ecuador is making history with a unique pregnancy. The father-to-be is carrying the baby of his transgender partner.”

The couple in question goes by the names Fernando Machado and Diane Rodríguez, but Fernando was born María while Diane was born Luis.

This means that the pregnant “male” is a biological female who is now the man of the house (albeit a pregnant man) while his female partner is a biological male who is now the lady of the house.

Although they take hormones to change their bodies to conform to their gender perceptions, they have not had sex-change surgery, otherwise, they would not have been able produce a baby together.

That means that Diane, who has male private parts, impregnated Fernando, who has female private parts.

That also means that even though Diane fathered the baby and Fernando will carry the baby in his womb (are you getting all this?), Diane, the biological male who supplied the sperm, will be the mother and Fernando, who provided the egg, will be the father.

As Rodríguez, who is a leading LGBT activist in Ecuador, told the Associated Press, “We're trying to break the myths about transsexuality.”

It looks to me like they’re creating a whole new set of myths.

So if they get divorced the woman who is going as a man gets to pay child support? That's the only positive I see in all this. At last the real man gets the dough. They'll find out how it feels to be left with nothing after they cash their check.

And the libs believe this is normal......

Hang on, let me get my chalk board out.

I think it is unethical that any medical specialist would help them.

(12-30-2015 04:18 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  http://townhall.com/columnists/michaelbr...r-n2098307

According to the story published by Fox Latino News, “A couple in Ecuador is making history with a unique pregnancy. The father-to-be is carrying the baby of his transgender partner.”

The couple in question goes by the names Fernando Machado and Diane Rodríguez, but Fernando was born María while Diane was born Luis.

This means that the pregnant “male” is a biological female who is now the man of the house (albeit a pregnant man) while his female partner is a biological male who is now the lady of the house.

Although they take hormones to change their bodies to conform to their gender perceptions, they have not had sex-change surgery, otherwise, they would not have been able produce a baby together.

That means that Diane, who has male private parts, impregnated Fernando, who has female private parts.

That also means that even though Diane fathered the baby and Fernando will carry the baby in his womb (are you getting all this?), Diane, the biological male who supplied the sperm, will be the mother and Fernando, who provided the egg, will be the father.

As Rodríguez, who is a leading LGBT activist in Ecuador, told the Associated Press, “We're trying to break the myths about transsexuality.”

It looks to me like they’re creating a whole new set of myths.

quit your bitching, some chick got pregnant by not even having sex. Not that I agree with this, but really?

(12-31-2015 12:10 AM)randaddyminer Wrote:  

(12-30-2015 04:18 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  http://townhall.com/columnists/michaelbr...r-n2098307

According to the story published by Fox Latino News, “A couple in Ecuador is making history with a unique pregnancy. The father-to-be is carrying the baby of his transgender partner.”

The couple in question goes by the names Fernando Machado and Diane Rodríguez, but Fernando was born María while Diane was born Luis.

This means that the pregnant “male” is a biological female who is now the man of the house (albeit a pregnant man) while his female partner is a biological male who is now the lady of the house.

Although they take hormones to change their bodies to conform to their gender perceptions, they have not had sex-change surgery, otherwise, they would not have been able produce a baby together.

That means that Diane, who has male private parts, impregnated Fernando, who has female private parts.

That also means that even though Diane fathered the baby and Fernando will carry the baby in his womb (are you getting all this?), Diane, the biological male who supplied the sperm, will be the mother and Fernando, who provided the egg, will be the father.

As Rodríguez, who is a leading LGBT activist in Ecuador, told the Associated Press, “We're trying to break the myths about transsexuality.”

It looks to me like they’re creating a whole new set of myths.

quit your bitching, some chick got pregnant by not even having sex. Not that I agree with this, but really?

I was not aware that posting an article was "bitching".

Randaddy's a little... "special".

don't be mad

(12-31-2015 12:58 AM)Paul M Wrote:  Randaddy's a little... "special".

Or the chica can't handle his liquor


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

Damn..just Damn.

what about the fishies? let's not leave them out of the fray....

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/spea...-they-are/

Quote:Why this is happening remains a mystery, says the lead author of a new study, despite the problem being detected more than a decade ago. “It is not clear what the specific cause of intersex is in these fish,” said Luke Iwanowicz, a USGS research biologist. “This study was designed to identify locations that may warrant further investigation."

The strongest suspicion focuses on what is poured down the drains of homes, businesses and farms every day. Scientists are worried that prescription drugs such as birth control and mood-control pharmaceuticals, flushed down toilets, and chemical pesticides such as atrazine, washed off farms by rain, have turned creeks, streams and rivers into chemical soups that disrupt the endocrines of marine life.

[How birth control pills are also altering the sex lives of fish]

These substances throw off functions that regulate hormones and the reproductive system, said USGS biologist Vicki Blazer, a co-author of the latest study and lead author of numerous earlier reports. At one polluted site Blazer examined in the Susquehanna River near Hershey, Pa., two years ago, 100 percent of the male smallmouth bass sampled had eggs.

The surprising thing found in the most recent survey, Iwanowicz said, is that the bass are being sexually transformed in more pristine waters at national wildlife refuges managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The agency's 560 refuges -- 71 in the Northeast -- provide a sanctuary for 1,000 fish species, 700 bird species and about 200 species of mammals.

some peculiar thingys happening with the genome up in the northeast.....must be global warming coupled with the human effect....

Quote:"These effects have been observed in other organisms, including mammals," said Don Tillitt, another co-author who is a research toxicologist at the USGS Columbia Environmental Research Center in Missouri. "The mechanism occurs in the epi-genome, around the genome. Not the genes, but how those genes are expressed."

I'm certain heyzeus will fix all this when he comes back......he was a fish lover....surely, he won't let this continue....the horror of it all....

last time I checked, scientists think they have figured out why men exist... http://www.iflscience.com/environment/why-do-men-exist ....yet the 'beer gut' is being redefined in some species....

shite like the op is nothing more than dollar general counter rack mag fodder....it's pathetic anyone gives two shites about crap like this....

it's not an enigma why this country and the others are mired in the muck regarding any type of policy....entirely too much lack of focus for the masses while protecting the affluent.....toss in the religious aspect, and it becomes unsolvable....

oh wellzy, I reckon' it's still fun to laugh at all the silliness.....cretins we still are as the whole...

Not that the numerous hormones they are both taking will affect the baby or anything...yeah. Poor kid.

(12-31-2015 05:48 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  Not that the numerous hormones they are both taking will affect the baby or anything...yeah. Poor kid.

what about the fishies eating the other fishies? what about the people eating the fishies? don't forget about 'them'

"we are what we eat" is a truism....

(12-31-2015 05:48 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  Not that the numerous hormones they are both taking will affect the baby or anything...yeah. Poor kid.

Anyone want to make a wager on how fcked up this kid ends up? Ill give 5 to 1 now it will be a basket case by age 10.

(12-31-2015 06:21 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(12-31-2015 05:48 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  Not that the numerous hormones they are both taking will affect the baby or anything...yeah. Poor kid.

Anyone want to make a wager on how fcked up this kid ends up? Ill give 5 to 1 now it will be a basket case by age 10.

along with all the others that don't have 'parents'.....

wtfe....natural selection it is.....