Just capped the bed vs DePaul (82-61). Our OOC resume is screwed. Hello 8/9 seed!

Brick 3's when the other team is in the double bonus?

(12-22-2015 11:30 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Brick 3's when the other team is in the double bonus?

Huh? Whats this got to do with GW vs Depaul?

(12-22-2015 11:32 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  

(12-22-2015 11:30 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Brick 3's when the other team is in the double bonus?

Huh? Whats this got to do with GW vs Depaul?

He must booze pretty hard during UC games. At least, I hope that's his excuse.

Super: put the sauce down and go to bed jr

I do agree with super

(12-22-2015 11:27 PM)jarr Wrote:  Just capped the bed vs DePaul (82-61). Our OOC resume is screwed. Hello 8/9 seed!

Bring on UK!!!!!!

Now that you've had a chance to sleep on it, anyone willing to bet we'll only be an 8/9 seed at best?

(12-23-2015 08:32 AM)JPBearcat3 Wrote:  Now that you've had a chance to sleep on it, anyone willing to bet we'll only be an 8/9 seed at best?

It's way too early to be thinking about seeding, but no doubt the conference is going to limit UC's upside in that regard.

(12-23-2015 08:44 AM)Coopdaddy67 Wrote:  

(12-23-2015 08:32 AM)JPBearcat3 Wrote:  Now that you've had a chance to sleep on it, anyone willing to bet we'll only be an 8/9 seed at best?

It's way too early to be thinking about seeding, but no doubt the conference is going to limit UC's upside in that regard.

The selection committee has been harsh on the AAC the past couple years and I see no reason why they won't do it again this year. I saw on the game thread someone mention that we got a 4 seed when we were 26-4 in the Great Midwest. Truth is times have changed... there is a lot more bias today than there was back then at all levels (administrators, coaches, media, etc.).

No knock, but this is probably a 7-10 seed type team regardless.

(12-23-2015 08:50 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  No knock, but this is probably a 7-10 seed type team regardless.

True.

Which means we will again get a tough draw in the first round (ie. Purdue) and a nearly insurmountable one in the second (ie. Michigan State, UK)

No way. If this team doesn't get a top 6 seed, I'll be shocked.

(12-23-2015 09:04 AM)JPBearcat3 Wrote:  No way. If this team doesn't get a top 6 seed, I'll be shocked.

then you'll be shocked.

(12-23-2015 08:49 AM)CliftonAve Wrote:  

(12-23-2015 08:44 AM)Coopdaddy67 Wrote:  

(12-23-2015 08:32 AM)JPBearcat3 Wrote:  Now that you've had a chance to sleep on it, anyone willing to bet we'll only be an 8/9 seed at best?

It's way too early to be thinking about seeding, but no doubt the conference is going to limit UC's upside in that regard.

The selection committee has been harsh on the AAC the past couple years and I see no reason why they won't do it again this year. I saw on the game thread someone mention that we got a 4 seed when we were 26-4 in the Great Midwest. Truth is times have changed... there is a lot more bias today than there was back then at all levels (administrators, coaches, media, etc.).

Remember SMU getting screwed two years ago and Louisville getting a 4 seed when they were ranked #4 in the nation? Committee has done us no favors!