john01992
Former ESPNer still in recovery mode
Posts: 16,277
Joined: Jul 2013
I Root For: John0 out!!!!
Location: The Worst P5 Program
|
How did the FBS transitional rule work in the early 2000s.
I was looking up the 2003-2005 conference realignment and noticed that schools like UCF, USF, UCONN, FIU, and FAU had contradictory information about what their classification was. back then the NCAA had a two year transitional period, however I can't figure when precisely they joined.
|
|
12-20-2015 01:50 PM |
|
banker
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11,958
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 1489
I Root For: Marshall
Location:
|
RE: How did the FBS transitional rule work in the early 2000s.
The rules on transition were changed after Marshall moved up in 1997 in response to complaints that Marshall had loaded up on 1-A transfers in 1996 (subsequently going 15-0 that year) knowing they were moving up and the players didn't have to sit a year with their transfer. The MAC didn't like that Marshall brought in a level of talent that immediately dominated the conference and the big conferences didn't like the fact that players could transfer "down" and play immediately to only return right back to the 1-A level.
The rules requiring a transition period were implemented, I believe, in 1999. It was initially just that a team could not play in a bowl their first year, so many conferences excluded them from participating in the conference championship game.
|
|
12-20-2015 07:34 PM |
|
billybobby777
The REAL BillyBobby
Posts: 11,898
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 502
I Root For: ECU, Army
Location: Houston dont sleepon
|
RE: How did the FBS transitional rule work in the early 2000s.
(12-20-2015 07:34 PM)banker Wrote: The rules on transition were changed after Marshall moved up in 1997 in response to complaints that Marshall had loaded up on 1-A transfers in 1996 (subsequently going 15-0 that year) knowing they were moving up and the players didn't have to sit a year with their transfer. The MAC didn't like that Marshall brought in a level of talent that immediately dominated the conference and the big conferences didn't like the fact that players could transfer "down" and play immediately to only return right back to the 1-A level.
The rules requiring a transition period were implemented, I believe, in 1999. It was initially just that a team could not play in a bowl their first year, so many conferences excluded them from participating in the conference championship game.
This is absolutely correct. Cheers!
|
|
12-20-2015 09:09 PM |
|
PurpleReigns
I AM...PURPLE AND GOLD!
Posts: 17,842
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation: 230
I Root For: ECU
Location: ENC
|
How did the FBS transitional rule work in the early 2000s.
Marshall: Gaming The System since 1996!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
|
|
12-20-2015 09:17 PM |
|
firmbizzle
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20,447
Joined: Jul 2008
Reputation: 442
I Root For: UF, UCF
Location:
|
RE: How did the FBS transitional rule work in the early 2000s.
UCF transitioned before that.
|
|
12-20-2015 09:44 PM |
|
banker
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11,958
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 1489
I Root For: Marshall
Location:
|
RE: How did the FBS transitional rule work in the early 2000s.
(12-20-2015 09:17 PM)PurpleReigns2012 Wrote: Marshall: Gaming The System since 1996!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Actually since 1971 when we got the rules concerning freshman eligibility changed.
|
|
12-20-2015 10:33 PM |
|
john01992
Former ESPNer still in recovery mode
Posts: 16,277
Joined: Jul 2013
I Root For: John0 out!!!!
Location: The Worst P5 Program
|
RE: How did the FBS transitional rule work in the early 2000s.
(12-20-2015 07:34 PM)banker Wrote: The rules on transition were changed after Marshall moved up in 1997 in response to complaints that Marshall had loaded up on 1-A transfers in 1996 (subsequently going 15-0 that year) knowing they were moving up and the players didn't have to sit a year with their transfer. The MAC didn't like that Marshall brought in a level of talent that immediately dominated the conference and the big conferences didn't like the fact that players could transfer "down" and play immediately to only return right back to the 1-A level.
The rules requiring a transition period were implemented, I believe, in 1999. It was initially just that a team could not play in a bowl their first year, so many conferences excluded them from participating in the conference championship game.
from what I can tell there is at least a two year transition rule. I'm just seeing a lot of these schools listed as FBS independents, and non FBS members in the same year by different websites
|
|
12-21-2015 01:17 AM |
|