(12-21-2015 12:38 AM)pfunk Wrote:  Drawing the home loss line at Dec '14 almost makes you forget we lost to CBU last November.

Yeah, but that game didn't count because Pastner had his fingers crossed or something.

(12-20-2015 10:48 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  Dec 2004 home results 2004 UNDER CAL


9 Sat, Dec 11, 2004 REG Mississippi SEC L 53 65 5 4 L 2 FedExForum
10 Sat, Dec 18, 2004 REG Austin Peay OVC W 71 66 6 4 W 1 FedExForum
11 Mon, Dec 20, 2004 REG Louisiana Tech WAC L 55 64 6 5 L 1 FedExForum
12 Thu, Dec 23, 2004 REG Providence Big East L 59 72 6 6 L 2 FedExForum
13 Thu, Dec 30, 2004 REG East Tennessee State Southern W 87 56 7 6 W 1 FedExForum


Posted for those with selective memory.

just out of curiosity, what do you think of the state of the basketball program right now. Don't base your answer on "how we cannot repeat what Cal did his last few years here". I'm asking you what you think of the program right this minute on the court and the attendance issue......I'l wait to read your response

(12-21-2015 12:27 AM)CUSA_NEWS Wrote:  Not even going to waste my time re-educating the masses.

I'll let my previous teaching session speak for itself:


From the One Thing Coach P got Right thread.... post#50, 51, 54 etc


Got a laugh reading my buddy stammers who stated in that thread how Paz had a tougher sched than Cal. Keep the laughter coming, guys.

What is he doing back there? I never know what he's doing.

(12-19-2015 10:50 AM)Tigx Wrote:  

(12-19-2015 06:31 AM)TallTiger Wrote:  Geoff was tweating that number out before the game was over. More than once. He's on a mission to get rid of Josh.

Calkins is not on any mission. He likes Josh better than he liked Cal or RC. Paper and radio guys tell the truth or give their opinion, and people think they care enough to have a mission.

It's called doing their job.

Geoff wrote multiple negative columns during the off season. I tweeted him and he answered me with don't you think he needs to go? Very objective and professional.

(12-22-2015 04:09 AM)TallTiger Wrote:  

(12-19-2015 10:50 AM)Tigx Wrote:  

(12-19-2015 06:31 AM)TallTiger Wrote:  Geoff was tweating that number out before the game was over. More than once. He's on a mission to get rid of Josh.

Calkins is not on any mission. He likes Josh better than he liked Cal or RC. Paper and radio guys tell the truth or give their opinion, and people think they care enough to have a mission.

It's called doing their job.

Geoff wrote multiple negative columns during the off season. I tweeted him and he answered me with don't you think he needs to go? Very objective and professional.

Why is it wrong if Geoff thinks he needs to go? The man is running our program into the ground, what is he supposed to write? He is being professional and telling the truth that so many want to bury their head on. He might be a great guy but an awful coach, pretty easy.

(12-22-2015 04:09 AM)TallTiger Wrote:  

(12-19-2015 10:50 AM)Tigx Wrote:  

(12-19-2015 06:31 AM)TallTiger Wrote:  Geoff was tweating that number out before the game was over. More than once. He's on a mission to get rid of Josh.

Calkins is not on any mission. He likes Josh better than he liked Cal or RC. Paper and radio guys tell the truth or give their opinion, and people think they care enough to have a mission.

It's called doing their job.

Geoff wrote multiple negative columns during the off season. I tweeted him and he answered me with don't you think he needs to go? Very objective and professional.

Geoff is not the daily Tiger hoops beat writer for the CA, that is Jason Smith.

Geoff is a journalist - it's his job to offer his viewpoint.

If he did ask you your opinion of whether Josh should stay, what is wrong with him asking you a question? You know, to get your opinion.

(12-21-2015 05:31 PM)tigersroll Wrote:  

(12-20-2015 10:48 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  Dec 2004 home results 2004 UNDER CAL


9 Sat, Dec 11, 2004 REG Mississippi SEC L 53 65 5 4 L 2 FedExForum
10 Sat, Dec 18, 2004 REG Austin Peay OVC W 71 66 6 4 W 1 FedExForum
11 Mon, Dec 20, 2004 REG Louisiana Tech WAC L 55 64 6 5 L 1 FedExForum
12 Thu, Dec 23, 2004 REG Providence Big East L 59 72 6 6 L 2 FedExForum
13 Thu, Dec 30, 2004 REG East Tennessee State Southern W 87 56 7 6 W 1 FedExForum


Posted for those with selective memory.

just out of curiosity, what do you think of the state of the basketball program right now. Don't base your answer on "how we cannot repeat what Cal did his last few years here". I'm asking you what you think of the program right this minute on the court and the attendance issue......I'l wait to read your response

I just love how they keep bringing that one bad year in an otherwise 8 year run of Imorovement to make their agenda. And then don't realize what the deal was that year.

Banks

Cancer

(12-22-2015 09:14 AM)Brother Bluto Wrote:  

(12-21-2015 05:31 PM)tigersroll Wrote:  

(12-20-2015 10:48 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  Dec 2004 home results 2004 UNDER CAL


9 Sat, Dec 11, 2004 REG Mississippi SEC L 53 65 5 4 L 2 FedExForum
10 Sat, Dec 18, 2004 REG Austin Peay OVC W 71 66 6 4 W 1 FedExForum
11 Mon, Dec 20, 2004 REG Louisiana Tech WAC L 55 64 6 5 L 1 FedExForum
12 Thu, Dec 23, 2004 REG Providence Big East L 59 72 6 6 L 2 FedExForum
13 Thu, Dec 30, 2004 REG East Tennessee State Southern W 87 56 7 6 W 1 FedExForum


Posted for those with selective memory.

just out of curiosity, what do you think of the state of the basketball program right now. Don't base your answer on "how we cannot repeat what Cal did his last few years here". I'm asking you what you think of the program right this minute on the court and the attendance issue......I'l wait to read your response

I just love how they keep bringing that one bad year in an otherwise 8 year run of Imorovement to make their agenda. And then don't realize what the deal was that year.

Banks

Cancer

Yea, not just the one bad year - as I mentioned earlier that you ignored. But, okay. D-Wag's year, Burks' senior year. All disappointing setbacks.

Hey, no agenda here. We have to make a change at coach and 90% of us know it. Only thing I'm pointing out is that, contrary to some of the vitriol from people who do have agendas, we are not a historical top 10 program that will automatically spring back to success just by firing a coach.

(12-22-2015 12:24 PM)Tiger87 Wrote:  

(12-22-2015 09:14 AM)Brother Bluto Wrote:  

(12-21-2015 05:31 PM)tigersroll Wrote:  

(12-20-2015 10:48 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  Dec 2004 home results 2004 UNDER CAL


9 Sat, Dec 11, 2004 REG Mississippi SEC L 53 65 5 4 L 2 FedExForum
10 Sat, Dec 18, 2004 REG Austin Peay OVC W 71 66 6 4 W 1 FedExForum
11 Mon, Dec 20, 2004 REG Louisiana Tech WAC L 55 64 6 5 L 1 FedExForum
12 Thu, Dec 23, 2004 REG Providence Big East L 59 72 6 6 L 2 FedExForum
13 Thu, Dec 30, 2004 REG East Tennessee State Southern W 87 56 7 6 W 1 FedExForum


Posted for those with selective memory.

just out of curiosity, what do you think of the state of the basketball program right now. Don't base your answer on "how we cannot repeat what Cal did his last few years here". I'm asking you what you think of the program right this minute on the court and the attendance issue......I'l wait to read your response

I just love how they keep bringing that one bad year in an otherwise 8 year run of Imorovement to make their agenda. And then don't realize what the deal was that year.

Banks

Cancer

Yea, not just the one bad year - as I mentioned earlier that you ignored. But, okay. D-Wag's year, Burks' senior year. All disappointing setbacks.

Hey, no agenda here. We have to make a change at coach and 90% of us know it. Only thing I'm pointing out is that, contrary to some of the vitriol from people who do have agendas, we are not a historical top 10 program that will automatically spring back to success just by firing a coach.

Year 1 NIT final 4

Year 2 NIT champs

Year 3 NCAA

Year 4 NCAA round of 32

Year 5 slip up because of Banks and still were 2 free throw away from the NCAA

Improvement every year but year 5


Some of you guys have bad memories

(12-22-2015 12:28 PM)Brother Bluto Wrote:  

(12-22-2015 12:24 PM)Tiger87 Wrote:  

(12-22-2015 09:14 AM)Brother Bluto Wrote:  

(12-21-2015 05:31 PM)tigersroll Wrote:  

(12-20-2015 10:48 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  Dec 2004 home results 2004 UNDER CAL


9 Sat, Dec 11, 2004 REG Mississippi SEC L 53 65 5 4 L 2 FedExForum
10 Sat, Dec 18, 2004 REG Austin Peay OVC W 71 66 6 4 W 1 FedExForum
11 Mon, Dec 20, 2004 REG Louisiana Tech WAC L 55 64 6 5 L 1 FedExForum
12 Thu, Dec 23, 2004 REG Providence Big East L 59 72 6 6 L 2 FedExForum
13 Thu, Dec 30, 2004 REG East Tennessee State Southern W 87 56 7 6 W 1 FedExForum


Posted for those with selective memory.

just out of curiosity, what do you think of the state of the basketball program right now. Don't base your answer on "how we cannot repeat what Cal did his last few years here". I'm asking you what you think of the program right this minute on the court and the attendance issue......I'l wait to read your response

I just love how they keep bringing that one bad year in an otherwise 8 year run of Imorovement to make their agenda. And then don't realize what the deal was that year.

Banks

Cancer

Yea, not just the one bad year - as I mentioned earlier that you ignored. But, okay. D-Wag's year, Burks' senior year. All disappointing setbacks.

Hey, no agenda here. We have to make a change at coach and 90% of us know it. Only thing I'm pointing out is that, contrary to some of the vitriol from people who do have agendas, we are not a historical top 10 program that will automatically spring back to success just by firing a coach.

Year 1 NIT final 4

Year 2 NIT champs

Year 3 NCAA

Year 4 NCAA round of 32

Year 5 slip up because of Banks and still were 2 free throw away from the NCAA

Improvement every year but year 5


Some of you guys have bad memories

My bad - I didn't get the rules for this thread. I didn't know you were settling for anything other than S16's as "improvement".

My memory was I was extremely disappointed with how the '02, '04 and '05 teams finished.

Then you should be miserable with 2010-2015, correct?

To me, NIT final four is same difference as teeth kicked in in round of 32 but to each their own.

If a team loses at home, and no one is there to see it, did it really occur?

(12-22-2015 09:30 PM)HoopDreams Wrote:  Then you should be miserable with 2010-2015, correct?

To me, NIT final four is same difference as teeth kicked in in round of 32 but to each their own.

Round of 32 is mucho > NIT anything. But, whatever. I'd say my disappointment was about the same for some of those years vs those early Cal years. Last year hit a whole new level though.